Softwr

Networking · head to head

Auvik vs ngrok

Auvik logo

Auvik

Networking

Cloud-based network monitoring and management priced by managed device count, quote-only

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
ngrok logo

ngrok

Networking

Reverse tunnel service that gives a local or private service a public URL without opening a firewall

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only ngrok has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Auvik no pricing is published anywhere on the site; every number requires submitting a lead form and speaking to sales, which slows down basic vendor comparison; ngrok free HTTP endpoints show a browser interstitial before the page loads, which breaks first impressions in demos and confuses anyone you send the link to.
  • They diverge on capability: Auvik covers Automated network mapping, ngrok covers Outbound agent tunnels.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Auvik and ngrok actually diverge.

Attributes where Auvik and ngrok differ
AttributeAuvikngrok
Starting priceOn requestFree
Pricing modelquote, per managed devicePer user per month
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsWebLinux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Networking).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Auvik

  • Automated network mapping
  • Configuration backup
  • Multi-tenant MSP view
  • Traffic insight
  • Device-based billing with exclusions

Only in ngrok

  • Outbound agent tunnels
  • Static domains
  • Traffic policy
  • Request inspection
  • Kubernetes ingress
  • TCP and TLS endpoints

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Auvik

  • An MSP wanting a single SaaS platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregationnot ngrok
  • An internal IT team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselvesnot ngrok
  • A network team wanting continuous, automatically updated network topology mapping rather than maintaining diagrams manuallynot ngrok
  • An organisation wanting traffic visibility by application without deploying a separate flow collectornot ngrok

ngrok

  • Receiving webhooks from a payment or messaging provider on a laptop during developmentnot Auvik
  • Demonstrating a work in progress application to someone outside the network without deploying itnot Auvik
  • Publishing a service inside a private network or Kubernetes cluster without a public load balancernot Auvik
  • Giving a partner a temporary authenticated endpoint into an internal APInot Auvik

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Auvik

  • No pricing is published anywhere on the site; every number requires submitting a lead form and speaking to sales, which slows down basic vendor comparison
  • Billing by managed device count means the total cost is not knowable in advance without first running an accurate device count against Auvik's specific inclusion and exclusion rules
  • As a SaaS-only product with no on-premises option, an organisation loses monitoring visibility if its own internet connection to Auvik's cloud goes down at the same time as the incident it needs to diagnose
  • MSP-focused multi-tenant packaging may include features an internal IT team monitoring only its own network does not need, while still pricing against that broader feature set
  • Configuration backup and restore depend on Auvik correctly supporting the specific hardware models on a given network; less common vendors may have thinner support
  • Volume discounts exist but are also not published, so an MSP scaling client count has no way to model margin impact before negotiating each contract renewal

ngrok

  • Free HTTP endpoints show a browser interstitial before the page loads, which breaks first impressions in demos and confuses anyone you send the link to.
  • All traffic passes through ngrok infrastructure, so you inherit its latency and an ngrok incident takes every published endpoint down at once with no local failover.
  • Pricing is per user seat plus allowances, so a platform team publishing many endpoints ends up buying seats for people who never open the dashboard.
  • Bandwidth is metered on paid tiers, so a workload that quietly grows into serving real traffic produces overage rather than a flat bill.
  • Traffic policy configuration is specific to ngrok, so the authentication and routing logic you accumulate at the edge has to be rebuilt if you later move to a conventional ingress.

Pricing, plan by plan

Auvik

On request
  • Auvik$undefined/month
    • Automated network mapping
    • Configuration backup
    • MSP multi-tenant packages available

ngrok

Free
  • FreeFree
    • One static domain
    • HTTP endpoints with a browser interstitial
    • Limited simultaneous connections
  • Personal$undefined/month
    • Removes the interstitial warning page
    • Additional reserved domains
    • TCP endpoints
  • Pro$undefined/month
    • Per user billing with team accounts
    • Traffic policy rules and edge authentication
    • Higher bandwidth allowances
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • Custom terms and volume pricing
    • Dedicated capacity options
    • Compliance and audit requirements

Which should you pick?

Choose Auvik if

  • You need automated network mapping.
  • You also want configuration backup.
Auvik review

Choose ngrok if

  • You need outbound agent tunnels.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
  • You also want static domains.
ngrok review

Questions people ask

Is Auvik or ngrok better?
Neither clearly leads. Auvik starts at On request and ngrok at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Auvik or ngrok?
ngrok has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Auvik and Free for ngrok.
Does Auvik or ngrok run on more platforms?
Auvik runs on Web. ngrok runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
Can I use ngrok for free?
Yes. ngrok has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Auvik starts at On request.
What is Auvik best used for?
Auvik is most often used for an msp wanting a single saas platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregation, an internal it team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselves, a network team wanting continuous, automatically updated network topology mapping rather than maintaining diagrams manually, an organisation wanting traffic visibility by application without deploying a separate flow collector. Of those, an msp wanting a single saas platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregation and an internal it team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselves are not what ngrok is typically brought in for.
What can Auvik do that ngrok cannot?
Auvik covers Automated network mapping, Configuration backup, Multi-tenant MSP view, Traffic insight. ngrok covers Outbound agent tunnels, Static domains, Traffic policy, Request inspection.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Auvik: Is Auvik priced per network or per device?

Per device, according to Auvik's own FAQ; some device categories like access points and printers are monitored at no additional charge.

ngrok: Can I use it in production?

It is sold for that now, with static domains, policy rules and a Kubernetes operator. The question is whether you accept a third party on the traffic path for every request.

Auvik: Is there any published price?

No, all pricing is quote-only through a sales conversation.

ngrok: Why does my free URL show a warning page?

Free HTTP endpoints carry an interstitial. Removing it requires a paid plan, and it is the most common reason people upgrade.

Auvik: Does Auvik require an on-premises server?

No, it is SaaS-delivered with a lightweight local collector rather than a full on-premises monitoring server.

ngrok: Does it work for SSH or a database?

Yes through TCP endpoints, which are a paid feature.

ngrok: What is the self hosted alternative?

A reverse proxy on a server you own with a tunnel back to the service, or one of the self hosted tunnel projects. All of them cost more setup time than the thing they replace.

Share

Related pages

More on Auvik

More on ngrok

Keep looking

Other head to heads