Networking · head to head
Auvik vs Domotz

Auvik
Networking
Cloud-based network monitoring and management priced by managed device count, quote-only
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Domotz
Networking
Network monitoring for MSPs and IT teams priced per managed device or per collector, with published rates
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Auvik no pricing is published anywhere on the site; every number requires submitting a lead form and speaking to sales, which slows down basic vendor comparison; Domotz the Managed Device Plan bills in bundles of ten, so a network with, for example, eleven devices to manage pays for twenty rather than a precise count
- They diverge on capability: Auvik covers Automated network mapping, Domotz covers Device discovery and monitoring.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Auvik and Domotz actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Networking).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Auvik
- Automated network mapping
- Configuration backup
- Multi-tenant MSP view
- Traffic insight
- Device-based billing with exclusions
Only in Domotz
- Device discovery and monitoring
- Remote access without VPN
- Two published pricing models
- Automated alerting
- MSP client segregation
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Auvik
- An MSP wanting a single SaaS platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregationnot Domotz
- An internal IT team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselvesnot Domotz
- A network team wanting continuous, automatically updated network topology mapping rather than maintaining diagrams manuallynot Domotz
- An organisation wanting traffic visibility by application without deploying a separate flow collectornot Domotz
Domotz
- An MSP with high device density per client site wanting predictable flat pricing per collector rather than counting individual devicesnot Auvik
- An IT integrator managing many small sites with few devices each, better served by per-device pricing than a flat collector feenot Auvik
- A field services or retail IT team needing remote access to branch equipment without configuring VPN tunnels to each sitenot Auvik
- A team wanting a directly comparable public price against Auvik before starting a sales conversation with either vendornot Auvik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Auvik
- No pricing is published anywhere on the site; every number requires submitting a lead form and speaking to sales, which slows down basic vendor comparison
- Billing by managed device count means the total cost is not knowable in advance without first running an accurate device count against Auvik's specific inclusion and exclusion rules
- As a SaaS-only product with no on-premises option, an organisation loses monitoring visibility if its own internet connection to Auvik's cloud goes down at the same time as the incident it needs to diagnose
- MSP-focused multi-tenant packaging may include features an internal IT team monitoring only its own network does not need, while still pricing against that broader feature set
- Configuration backup and restore depend on Auvik correctly supporting the specific hardware models on a given network; less common vendors may have thinner support
- Volume discounts exist but are also not published, so an MSP scaling client count has no way to model margin impact before negotiating each contract renewal
Domotz
- The Managed Device Plan bills in bundles of ten, so a network with, for example, eleven devices to manage pays for twenty rather than a precise count
- The Collector Plan gives full access per collector regardless of device count monitored by that collector, which can be inefficient for a site with very few devices relative to the flat $35 fee
- As a SaaS platform, ongoing monitoring depends on the local Collector maintaining connectivity to Domotz's cloud, so a site-level outage that also cuts collector connectivity limits remote visibility exactly when it is needed
- Feature depth for large enterprise NOC-style operations is narrower than platforms built for that scale, since Domotz's roadmap centres on MSP and integrator use cases
- Remote access without VPN configuration is convenient but depends on Domotz's own relay infrastructure remaining available and trusted, which is a different security posture than a customer-controlled VPN
- Volume and annual discounts exist but the specific discount schedule is not fully published, so very large deployments still benefit from negotiating directly rather than relying on the list price
Pricing, plan by plan
Auvik
On request- Auvik$undefined/month
- Automated network mapping
- Configuration backup
- MSP multi-tenant packages available
Domotz
On request- Collector Plan$35/month
- Full platform access on every device that collector monitors
- Managed Device Plan$1.5/month
- Billed in bundles of 10 devices
- All non-managed devices on the network discovered at no extra cost
Which should you pick?
Choose Domotz if
- You need device discovery and monitoring.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want remote access without vpn.
Questions people ask
- Is Auvik or Domotz better?
- Neither clearly leads. Auvik starts at On request and Domotz at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Auvik or Domotz?
- Auvik starts at On request and Domotz at On request.
- Does Auvik or Domotz run on more platforms?
- Auvik runs on Web. Domotz runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Auvik best used for?
- Auvik is most often used for an msp wanting a single saas platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregation, an internal it team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselves, a network team wanting continuous, automatically updated network topology mapping rather than maintaining diagrams manually, an organisation wanting traffic visibility by application without deploying a separate flow collector. Of those, an msp wanting a single saas platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregation and an internal it team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselves are not what Domotz is typically brought in for.
- What can Auvik do that Domotz cannot?
- Auvik covers Automated network mapping, Configuration backup, Multi-tenant MSP view, Traffic insight. Domotz covers Device discovery and monitoring, Remote access without VPN, Two published pricing models, Automated alerting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Auvik: Is Auvik priced per network or per device?
Per device, according to Auvik's own FAQ; some device categories like access points and printers are monitored at no additional charge.
Domotz: Is pricing based on networks, sites or devices?
Devices. Domotz states explicitly there are no per-site, per-network or per-user charges.
Auvik: Is there any published price?
No, all pricing is quote-only through a sales conversation.
Domotz: What is the difference between the two plans?
The Collector Plan is a flat $35/month per collector with full access to everything that collector monitors; the Managed Device Plan is $1.50/month per device, billed in bundles of ten.
Auvik: Does Auvik require an on-premises server?
No, it is SaaS-delivered with a lightweight local collector rather than a full on-premises monitoring server.
Domotz: Is there a free trial?
Yes, a 14-day free trial is offered.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Auvik vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Auvik vs LibreNMS
- Auvik vs Kentik
- Auvik vs Zabbix
- Auvik vs ThousandEyes
- Auvik vs Icinga
- Auvik vs OpenVPN
- Auvik vs Consul
- Auvik vs Tailscale
- Auvik vs Cisco Meraki
- Auvik vs HiveMQ
- Auvik vs Traefik
- Auvik vs ZeroTier
- Auvik vs Juniper Mist
- Auvik vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Auvik vs Nebula
- Auvik vs ngrok
- Auvik vs Twingate
- Auvik vs Catchpoint
- Auvik vs Netdata
- Auvik vs OPNsense
- Domotz vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Domotz vs LibreNMS
- Domotz vs Kentik
- Domotz vs Zabbix
- Domotz vs ThousandEyes
- Domotz vs Icinga
- Domotz vs OpenVPN
- Domotz vs Consul
- Domotz vs Tailscale
- Domotz vs Cisco Meraki
- Domotz vs HiveMQ
- Domotz vs Traefik
- Domotz vs ZeroTier
- Domotz vs Juniper Mist
- Domotz vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Domotz vs Nebula
- Domotz vs ngrok
- Domotz vs Twingate
- Domotz vs Catchpoint
- Domotz vs Netdata
- Domotz vs OPNsense
