Networking · head to head
Auvik vs Tailscale

Auvik
Networking
Cloud-based network monitoring and management priced by managed device count, quote-only
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Tailscale
Networking
Zero-trust mesh VPN built on WireGuard with identity-based access
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Tailscale has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Auvik no pricing is published anywhere on the site; every number requires submitting a lead form and speaking to sales, which slows down basic vendor comparison; Tailscale requires active configuration and management; cannot be deployed passively like consumer VPNs
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Auvik and Tailscale actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Networking).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Auvik
- Automated network mapping
- Configuration backup
- Multi-tenant MSP view
- Traffic insight
- Device-based billing with exclusions
Only in Tailscale
Nothing recorded that Auvik does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Auvik
- An MSP wanting a single SaaS platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregationnot Tailscale
- An internal IT team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselvesnot Tailscale
- A network team wanting continuous, automatically updated network topology mapping rather than maintaining diagrams manuallynot Tailscale
- An organisation wanting traffic visibility by application without deploying a separate flow collectornot Tailscale
Tailscale
- Remote team access to internal services without VPN concentratorsnot Auvik
- Hybrid cloud connectivity across AWS, Azure, GCP, and on-premises networksnot Auvik
- CI/CD pipeline access to internal infrastructure (databases, Kubernetes clusters)not Auvik
- Zero-trust access to SSH, Kubernetes, and databases without bastion hostsnot Auvik
- Mobile and IoT device management in enterprise environmentsnot Auvik
- Temporary contractor and third-party access controlnot Auvik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Auvik
- No pricing is published anywhere on the site; every number requires submitting a lead form and speaking to sales, which slows down basic vendor comparison
- Billing by managed device count means the total cost is not knowable in advance without first running an accurate device count against Auvik's specific inclusion and exclusion rules
- As a SaaS-only product with no on-premises option, an organisation loses monitoring visibility if its own internet connection to Auvik's cloud goes down at the same time as the incident it needs to diagnose
- MSP-focused multi-tenant packaging may include features an internal IT team monitoring only its own network does not need, while still pricing against that broader feature set
- Configuration backup and restore depend on Auvik correctly supporting the specific hardware models on a given network; less common vendors may have thinner support
- Volume discounts exist but are also not published, so an MSP scaling client count has no way to model margin impact before negotiating each contract renewal
Tailscale
- Requires active configuration and management; cannot be deployed passively like consumer VPNs
- Device posture policies and JIT access tiers are locked behind Premium subscription (£18/month), raising per-user costs for enterprises
- Limited support for legacy protocols and non-modern operating systems (Windows 7, older Android versions)
- Centralised control plane operated by Tailscale (hosted in US); no self-hosted control plane option for air-gapped or sovereign deployments
- Cannot replace full VPN functionality for accessing legacy IP-based services; only applicable to modern infrastructure
Pricing, plan by plan
Auvik
On request- Auvik$undefined/month
- Automated network mapping
- Configuration backup
- MSP multi-tenant packages available
Tailscale
Free- PersonalFree
- Up to 6 users
- Unlimited devices per user
- 1,000 ephemeral resource minutes per month
- Standard$8/month
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited devices
- 1,000 ephemeral resource minutes per month
- Premium$18/month
- Unlimited users and devices
- 10,000 ephemeral resource minutes per month
- 300 ACL groups
- EnterpriseFree
- Custom pricing
- Unlimited resources
- Advanced security features
Which should you pick?
Choose Tailscale if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, API, Web.
Questions people ask
- Is Auvik or Tailscale better?
- Neither clearly leads. Auvik starts at On request and Tailscale at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Auvik or Tailscale?
- Tailscale has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Auvik and Free for Tailscale.
- Does Auvik or Tailscale run on more platforms?
- Auvik runs on Web. Tailscale runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android, API, Web.
- Can I use Tailscale for free?
- Yes. Tailscale has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Auvik starts at On request.
- What is Auvik best used for?
- Auvik is most often used for an msp wanting a single saas platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregation, an internal it team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselves, a network team wanting continuous, automatically updated network topology mapping rather than maintaining diagrams manually, an organisation wanting traffic visibility by application without deploying a separate flow collector. Of those, an msp wanting a single saas platform to monitor and map multiple client networks with per-client segregation and an internal it team wanting automatic, versioned configuration backup for switches and routers without managing that infrastructure themselves are not what Tailscale is typically brought in for.
- What can Auvik do that Tailscale cannot?
- Auvik covers Automated network mapping, Configuration backup, Multi-tenant MSP view, Traffic insight.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Auvik: Is Auvik priced per network or per device?
Per device, according to Auvik's own FAQ; some device categories like access points and printers are monitored at no additional charge.
Tailscale: Is Tailscale free?
Tailscale Personal tier is free forever for up to 6 users. Standard (£8/month per user) adds team features, Premium (£18/month per user) adds security controls, and Enterprise tiers are custom priced.
SourceAuvik: Is there any published price?
No, all pricing is quote-only through a sales conversation.
Tailscale: Does Tailscale route all traffic through a central gateway?
No. Tailscale creates direct encrypted connections between devices using WireGuard. It only proxies traffic when direct peer connections are not possible (some restrictive NAT scenarios). This reduces latency and eliminates VPN gateway bottlenecks.
SourceAuvik: Does Auvik require an on-premises server?
No, it is SaaS-delivered with a lightweight local collector rather than a full on-premises monitoring server.
Tailscale: Can I host Tailscale on-premises?
No. Tailscale provides a hosted control plane only. For fully self-hosted mesh networking, consider WireGuard with manual key management or Netmaker. Tailscale Enterprise can provide custom deployments for specific requirements.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Auvik vs Domotz
- Auvik vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Auvik vs LibreNMS
- Auvik vs Kentik
- Auvik vs Zabbix
- Auvik vs ThousandEyes
- Auvik vs Icinga
- Auvik vs OpenVPN
- Auvik vs Consul
- Auvik vs Cisco Meraki
- Auvik vs HiveMQ
- Auvik vs Traefik
- Auvik vs ZeroTier
- Auvik vs Juniper Mist
- Auvik vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Auvik vs Nebula
- Auvik vs ngrok
- Auvik vs Twingate
- Auvik vs NetBird
- Auvik vs Headscale
- Auvik vs Grafana
- Auvik vs Prometheus
- Auvik vs Cloudflare
- Auvik vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Auvik vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Tailscale vs Domotz
- Tailscale vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Tailscale vs LibreNMS
- Tailscale vs Kentik
- Tailscale vs Zabbix
- Tailscale vs ThousandEyes
- Tailscale vs Icinga
- Tailscale vs OpenVPN
- Tailscale vs Consul
- Tailscale vs Cisco Meraki
- Tailscale vs HiveMQ
- Tailscale vs Traefik
- Tailscale vs ZeroTier
- Tailscale vs Juniper Mist
- Tailscale vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Tailscale vs Nebula
- Tailscale vs ngrok
- Tailscale vs Twingate
- Tailscale vs NetBird
- Tailscale vs Headscale
- Tailscale vs Grafana
- Tailscale vs Prometheus
- Tailscale vs Cloudflare
- Tailscale vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Tailscale vs Ubiquiti UniFi
