Networking · head to head
Ivanti vs ngrok

Ivanti
Networking
Security, service management, and unified endpoint management
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

ngrok
Networking
Reverse tunnel service that gives a local or private service a public URL without opening a firewall
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only ngrok has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Ivanti no pricing information published - enterprise custom pricing required; ngrok free HTTP endpoints show a browser interstitial before the page loads, which breaks first impressions in demos and confuses anyone you send the link to.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ivanti and ngrok actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Networking).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ivanti
Nothing recorded that ngrok does not also cover.
Only in ngrok
- Outbound agent tunnels
- Static domains
- Traffic policy
- Request inspection
- Kubernetes ingress
- TCP and TLS endpoints
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ivanti
- Controlling device compliance and patches for remote workforcesnot ngrok
- Automating service ticketing and change processes at enterprise scalenot ngrok
- Enforcing device compliance before network access in regulated industriesnot ngrok
- Prioritizing vulnerability patches by risk levelnot ngrok
- Enabling passwordless zero-trust access without VPN infrastructurenot ngrok
ngrok
- Receiving webhooks from a payment or messaging provider on a laptop during developmentnot Ivanti
- Demonstrating a work in progress application to someone outside the network without deploying itnot Ivanti
- Publishing a service inside a private network or Kubernetes cluster without a public load balancernot Ivanti
- Giving a partner a temporary authenticated endpoint into an internal APInot Ivanti
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ivanti
- no pricing information published - enterprise custom pricing required
ngrok
- Free HTTP endpoints show a browser interstitial before the page loads, which breaks first impressions in demos and confuses anyone you send the link to.
- All traffic passes through ngrok infrastructure, so you inherit its latency and an ngrok incident takes every published endpoint down at once with no local failover.
- Pricing is per user seat plus allowances, so a platform team publishing many endpoints ends up buying seats for people who never open the dashboard.
- Bandwidth is metered on paid tiers, so a workload that quietly grows into serving real traffic produces overage rather than a flat bill.
- Traffic policy configuration is specific to ngrok, so the authentication and routing logic you accumulate at the edge has to be rebuilt if you later move to a conventional ingress.
Pricing, plan by plan
Ivanti
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Ivanti review.
ngrok
Free- FreeFree
- One static domain
- HTTP endpoints with a browser interstitial
- Limited simultaneous connections
- Personal$undefined/month
- Removes the interstitial warning page
- Additional reserved domains
- TCP endpoints
- Pro$undefined/month
- Per user billing with team accounts
- Traffic policy rules and edge authentication
- Higher bandwidth allowances
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom terms and volume pricing
- Dedicated capacity options
- Compliance and audit requirements
Which should you pick?
Choose Ivanti if
Nothing in the data separates Ivanti from ngrok on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose ngrok if
- You need outbound agent tunnels.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want static domains.
Questions people ask
- Is Ivanti or ngrok better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ivanti starts at On request and ngrok at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ivanti or ngrok?
- ngrok has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Ivanti and Free for ngrok.
- Does Ivanti or ngrok run on more platforms?
- Ivanti runs on Web. ngrok runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use ngrok for free?
- Yes. ngrok has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Ivanti starts at On request.
- What is Ivanti best used for?
- Ivanti is most often used for controlling device compliance and patches for remote workforces, automating service ticketing and change processes at enterprise scale, enforcing device compliance before network access in regulated industries, prioritizing vulnerability patches by risk level. Of those, controlling device compliance and patches for remote workforces and automating service ticketing and change processes at enterprise scale are not what ngrok is typically brought in for.
- What can Ivanti do that ngrok cannot?
- ngrok covers Outbound agent tunnels, Static domains, Traffic policy, Request inspection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ivanti: How much does Ivanti cost?
Ivanti does not publish pricing on their website. As an enterprise solution, pricing is customized based on organizational needs. Contact Ivanti through their website to request a demo and pricing information.
Sourcengrok: Can I use it in production?
It is sold for that now, with static domains, policy rules and a Kubernetes operator. The question is whether you accept a third party on the traffic path for every request.
ngrok: Why does my free URL show a warning page?
Free HTTP endpoints carry an interstitial. Removing it requires a paid plan, and it is the most common reason people upgrade.
ngrok: Does it work for SSH or a database?
Yes through TCP endpoints, which are a paid feature.
ngrok: What is the self hosted alternative?
A reverse proxy on a server you own with a tunnel back to the service, or one of the self hosted tunnel projects. All of them cost more setup time than the thing they replace.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Ivanti vs Consul
- Ivanti vs Cloudflare
- Ivanti vs Grafana
- Ivanti vs Prometheus
- Ivanti vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Ivanti vs Tailscale
- Ivanti vs Auvik
- Ivanti vs Cisco Meraki
- Ivanti vs Catchpoint
- Ivanti vs Icinga
- Ivanti vs Domotz
- Ivanti vs HiveMQ
- Ivanti vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- Ivanti vs Nebula
- Ivanti vs Palo Alto Networks
- Ivanti vs Splunk
- Ivanti vs Twingate
- Ivanti vs Traefik
- Ivanti vs pfSense
- Ivanti vs Kentik
- Ivanti vs Netdata
- Ivanti vs OpenVPN
- Ivanti vs ThousandEyes
- Ivanti vs ZeroTier
- Ivanti vs Juniper Mist
- ngrok vs Consul
- ngrok vs Cloudflare
- ngrok vs Grafana
- ngrok vs Prometheus
- ngrok vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- ngrok vs Tailscale
- ngrok vs Auvik
- ngrok vs Cisco Meraki
- ngrok vs Catchpoint
- ngrok vs Icinga
- ngrok vs Domotz
- ngrok vs HiveMQ
- ngrok vs Eclipse Mosquitto
- ngrok vs Nebula
- ngrok vs Palo Alto Networks
- ngrok vs Splunk
- ngrok vs Twingate
- ngrok vs Traefik
- ngrok vs pfSense
- ngrok vs Kentik
- ngrok vs Netdata
- ngrok vs OpenVPN
- ngrok vs ThousandEyes
- ngrok vs ZeroTier
- ngrok vs Juniper Mist
