Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Milvus

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Milvus
Machine Learning
Open-source vector database for scalable similarity search
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Milvus vector dimensions are capped at 32,768
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Milvus covers Billion-scale vectors.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Milvus actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Milvus
- Billion-scale vectors
- Multiple index types
- GPU acceleration
- Hybrid search
- Data partitioning
- PyTorch
- TensorFlow
- Hugging Face
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Milvus
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Milvus
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Milvus
Milvus
- Self hosting a vector database for semantic searchnot authentik
- Storing and querying embeddings for retrieval augmented generationnot authentik
- Similarity search over images, audio or text at scalenot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Milvus
- Vector dimensions are capped at 32,768
- A collection is limited to 64 fields, 1,024 partitions and 16 shards
- Only 1 index is allowed per field
- Search returns at most 16,384 vectors as top-k, and nq is capped at 16,384
- Input and output per RPC is capped at 64 MB for insert, search and query
- VARCHAR values are limited to 65,535 characters
- Data loaded into query nodes cannot exceed 90% of available memory
- An instance supports at most 65,536 collections
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Milvus
Free- Open SourceFree
- Full features
- Self-hosted
- Community support
- Zilliz CloudFree
- Managed service
- Free tier available
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Milvus if
- You need billion-scale vectors.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Mac, Windows, Web.
- You also want multiple index types.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Milvus better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Milvus at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Milvus?
- authentik starts at Free and Milvus at Free.
- Does authentik or Milvus run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Milvus runs on Linux, Mac, Windows, Web.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Milvus is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Milvus cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Milvus covers Billion-scale vectors, Multiple index types, GPU acceleration, Hybrid search.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Milvus: How much does Milvus cost?
Milvus is open-source and free to use and modify. The self-hosted version has no licensing cost. Zilliz Cloud (the managed SaaS version) does not publish pricing on the website.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Milvus: Is there a free or open-source version of Milvus?
Yes, Milvus is fully open-source and available for free. Milvus Lite is a lightweight option for learning and prototyping that can be installed via pip.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Milvus: Does Milvus offer a managed cloud service?
Yes, Zilliz Cloud is a fully managed Milvus cloud offering with serverless and dedicated cluster options. Pricing must be requested from the company as it is not listed on the public website.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs Google Vertex AI
- authentik vs AWS SageMaker
- authentik vs Azure Machine Learning
- authentik vs DataRobot
- authentik vs Pinecone
- authentik vs Weaviate
- authentik vs Ray
- authentik vs Fal AI
- authentik vs Jupyter
- authentik vs Keras
- authentik vs LangChain
- authentik vs Weights & Biases
- authentik vs Alteryx
- authentik vs Anaconda
- authentik vs Domino Data Lab
- authentik vs DVC
- authentik vs Semantic Kernel
- Milvus vs Authelia
- Milvus vs Logto
- Milvus vs Ory
- Milvus vs Passbolt
- Milvus vs Clerk
- Milvus vs 1Password
- Milvus vs Frontegg
- Milvus vs OWASP ZAP
- Milvus vs Infisical
- Milvus vs Chainguard
- Milvus vs Bitwarden
- Milvus vs Cosign
- Milvus vs CyberGhost VPN
- Milvus vs Dahua Technology
- Milvus vs Descope
- Milvus vs Drata
- Milvus vs DTiQ
- Milvus vs Ory Kratos
- Milvus vs Google Vertex AI
- Milvus vs AWS SageMaker
- Milvus vs Azure Machine Learning
- Milvus vs DataRobot
- Milvus vs Pinecone
- Milvus vs Weaviate
- Milvus vs Ray
- Milvus vs Fal AI
- Milvus vs Jupyter
- Milvus vs Keras
- Milvus vs LangChain
- Milvus vs Weights & Biases
- Milvus vs Alteryx
- Milvus vs Anaconda
- Milvus vs Domino Data Lab
- Milvus vs DVC
- Milvus vs Semantic Kernel
