Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Keras

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Keras limited customization compared to TensorFlow; advanced users may find constraints in complex model designs
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Keras covers Sequential and Functional API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Keras actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Keras
- Sequential and Functional API
- Pre-built neural network layers
- Model training and evaluation
- Transfer learning
- Model serialization
- TensorFlow
- JAX
- PyTorch
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Keras
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Keras
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Keras
Keras
- Machine learningnot authentik
- Data analysisnot authentik
- Model trainingnot authentik
- Predictive analyticsnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Keras
- Limited customization compared to TensorFlow; advanced users may find constraints in complex model designs
- Error messages can be vague and unhelpful, making debugging challenging
- Smaller ecosystem and fewer pre-trained models than TensorFlow or PyTorch
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Keras
Free- Open SourceFree
- High-level API
- Pre-built layers
- Model serialization
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Keras if
- You need sequential and functional api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Python, Google Colab, Jupyter.
- You also want pre-built neural network layers.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Keras better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Keras at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Keras?
- authentik starts at Free and Keras at Free.
- Does authentik or Keras run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Keras runs on Python, Google Colab, Jupyter.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Keras is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Keras cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Keras covers Sequential and Functional API, Pre-built neural network layers, Model training and evaluation, Transfer learning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Keras: What is Keras?
Keras is a high-level deep learning API built on top of TensorFlow that simplifies building and training neural networks. Keras 3 supports multiple backends including TensorFlow, PyTorch, and JAX, making it backend-agnostic.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Keras: What model architectures does Keras support?
Keras supports the Sequential model for linear stacks of layers, the Functional API for arbitrary graph architectures, and model subclassing for custom implementations. All approaches provide access to layers, optimizers, metrics, and callbacks.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Keras: Can Keras models run on TPUs and GPUs?
Yes, Keras models can run on TPU Pods or large GPU clusters, be exported to run in browsers or on mobile devices, and be served via web APIs.
SourceKeras: Does Keras offer pre-trained models?
Yes, Keras provides pre-trained models through KerasHub and Keras Applications for common deep learning tasks like image classification, object detection, and NLP.
SourceKeras: Who should use Keras?
Keras is ideal for beginners and rapid prototyping due to its simplicity and user-friendly interface. Advanced users and production deployments may benefit more from lower-level frameworks like TensorFlow or PyTorch for greater customization.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs PyTorch
- authentik vs scikit-learn
- authentik vs Python
- authentik vs Anaconda
- authentik vs AWS SageMaker
- authentik vs Azure Machine Learning
- authentik vs DataRobot
- authentik vs Jupyter
- authentik vs H2O.ai
- authentik vs Dataiku
- authentik vs Pinecone
- authentik vs Groq
- authentik vs Weka
- authentik vs BentoML
- authentik vs ClearML
- authentik vs Cohere
- authentik vs Dask
- authentik vs Fal AI
- Keras vs Authelia
- Keras vs Logto
- Keras vs Ory
- Keras vs Passbolt
- Keras vs Clerk
- Keras vs 1Password
- Keras vs Frontegg
- Keras vs OWASP ZAP
- Keras vs Infisical
- Keras vs Chainguard
- Keras vs Bitwarden
- Keras vs Cosign
- Keras vs CyberGhost VPN
- Keras vs Dahua Technology
- Keras vs Descope
- Keras vs Drata
- Keras vs DTiQ
- Keras vs Ory Kratos
- Keras vs PyTorch
- Keras vs scikit-learn
- Keras vs Python
- Keras vs Anaconda
- Keras vs AWS SageMaker
- Keras vs Azure Machine Learning
- Keras vs DataRobot
- Keras vs Jupyter
- Keras vs H2O.ai
- Keras vs Dataiku
- Keras vs Pinecone
- Keras vs Groq
- Keras vs Weka
- Keras vs BentoML
- Keras vs ClearML
- Keras vs Cohere
- Keras vs Dask
- Keras vs Fal AI

