Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs H2O.ai

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

H2O.ai
Machine Learning
AI Cloud for building and deploying AI applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; H2O.ai java is always required to run H2O-3 even when working from R or Python, and only a 64-bit JRE or JDK is supported
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, H2O.ai covers AutoML.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and H2O.ai actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in H2O.ai
- AutoML
- Distributed computing
- Feature engineering
- Model explainability
- Time series forecasting
- Spark
- Hadoop
- Python
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot H2O.ai
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot H2O.ai
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot H2O.ai
H2O.ai
- Distributed in-memory machine learning over large datasetsnot authentik
- Training and productionising models from R or Python against a shared H2O clusternot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
H2O.ai
- Java is always required to run H2O-3 even when working from R or Python, and only a 64-bit JRE or JDK is supported
- Supported Java versions stop at Java SE 17; newer versions only run by forcing an unsupported version flag and are guaranteed for experiments rather than production
- H2O-3 only supports numpy below version 2, so a numpy 2 environment must be downgraded
- Supported Python versions are limited to 3.7 through 3.11
- The Flow web UI requires an internet browser and is the only graphical interface
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
H2O.ai
Free- H2O-3 Open SourceFree
- Core algorithms
- AutoML
- Community support
- Driverless AIFree
- Automatic feature engineering
- Model explainability
- Enterprise support
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose H2O.ai if
- You need automl.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want distributed computing.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or H2O.ai better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and H2O.ai at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or H2O.ai?
- authentik starts at Free and H2O.ai at Free.
- Does authentik or H2O.ai run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. H2O.ai runs on Web, Cloud.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what H2O.ai is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that H2O.ai cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. H2O.ai covers AutoML, Distributed computing, Feature engineering, Model explainability.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
H2O.ai: Is H2O open source and free?
Yes. H2O-3 OSS is free and Apache-licensed, designed for self-managed and experimental workflows. H2O.ai also offers enterprise cloud solutions with additional features.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
H2O.ai: How many companies use H2O's open source platform?
Over 18,000 companies across Finance, Insurance, Healthcare, Retail, Telco, Sales, and Marketing use H2O's open-source machine learning platform.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs DataRobot
- authentik vs scikit-learn
- authentik vs TensorFlow
- authentik vs Apache Spark MLlib
- authentik vs Google Vertex AI
- authentik vs Azure Machine Learning
- authentik vs RapidMiner
- authentik vs Snowflake
- authentik vs Palantir Foundry
- authentik vs Domino Data Lab
- authentik vs Cohere
- authentik vs Ray
- authentik vs ClearML
- authentik vs Dask
- authentik vs Fal AI
- authentik vs Groq
- authentik vs Haystack
- H2O.ai vs Authelia
- H2O.ai vs Logto
- H2O.ai vs Ory
- H2O.ai vs Passbolt
- H2O.ai vs Clerk
- H2O.ai vs 1Password
- H2O.ai vs Frontegg
- H2O.ai vs OWASP ZAP
- H2O.ai vs Infisical
- H2O.ai vs Chainguard
- H2O.ai vs Bitwarden
- H2O.ai vs Cosign
- H2O.ai vs CyberGhost VPN
- H2O.ai vs Dahua Technology
- H2O.ai vs Descope
- H2O.ai vs Drata
- H2O.ai vs DTiQ
- H2O.ai vs Ory Kratos
- H2O.ai vs DataRobot
- H2O.ai vs scikit-learn
- H2O.ai vs TensorFlow
- H2O.ai vs Apache Spark MLlib
- H2O.ai vs Google Vertex AI
- H2O.ai vs Azure Machine Learning
- H2O.ai vs RapidMiner
- H2O.ai vs Snowflake
- H2O.ai vs Palantir Foundry
- H2O.ai vs Domino Data Lab
- H2O.ai vs Cohere
- H2O.ai vs Ray
- H2O.ai vs ClearML
- H2O.ai vs Dask
- H2O.ai vs Fal AI
- H2O.ai vs Groq
- H2O.ai vs Haystack
