Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Check Point Software

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Check Point Software
Cybersecurity
AI Transforms the Network. We Transform the Firewall.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only authentik has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Check Point Software no pricing published; directed to contact sales or find a partner
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Check Point Software actually diverge.
| Attribute | authentik | Check Point Software |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Open-source core with a paid enterprise tier | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Check Point Software
Nothing recorded that authentik does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Check Point Software
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Check Point Software
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Check Point Software
Check Point Software
- Protecting hybrid cloud from ransomwarenot authentik
- Implementing zero trust on endpointsnot authentik
- Securing AI deployments from threatsnot authentik
- Detecting advanced threats across networksnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Check Point Software
- No pricing published; directed to contact sales or find a partner
- Cybersecurity enterprise software typically sold on quote-only basis
- No transparent pricing for any product suite
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Check Point Software
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Check Point Software review.
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Check Point Software if
Nothing in the data separates Check Point Software from authentik on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Check Point Software better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Check Point Software at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Check Point Software?
- authentik has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for authentik and On request for Check Point Software.
- Does authentik or Check Point Software run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Check Point Software runs on Web.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Yes. authentik has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Check Point Software starts at On request.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Check Point Software is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Check Point Software cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Check Point Software: How much does Check Point Software cost?
Check Point Software does not publish pricing. The vendor directs customers to contact sales or find a partner. Pricing is quote-based and customized per deployment.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Check Point Software: Does Check Point Software offer a free trial or demo?
No pricing or free tier information is published on the Check Point website. Contact their sales team or find an authorized partner to request a demo.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Related pages
More on Check Point Software
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs Bitdefender Total Security
- authentik vs Norton 360
- authentik vs LastPass
- authentik vs Private Internet Access
- authentik vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- authentik vs Windscribe
- authentik vs Fortinet FortiGate
- authentik vs IBM QRadar
- authentik vs Ping Identity
- authentik vs OneTrust
- authentik vs Transcend
- authentik vs WireGuard
- authentik vs Akeyless
- authentik vs DataGrail
- authentik vs Delinea
- authentik vs Doppler
- authentik vs Bitdefender VPN
- Check Point Software vs Authelia
- Check Point Software vs Logto
- Check Point Software vs Ory
- Check Point Software vs Passbolt
- Check Point Software vs Clerk
- Check Point Software vs 1Password
- Check Point Software vs Frontegg
- Check Point Software vs OWASP ZAP
- Check Point Software vs Infisical
- Check Point Software vs Chainguard
- Check Point Software vs Bitwarden
- Check Point Software vs Cosign
- Check Point Software vs CyberGhost VPN
- Check Point Software vs Dahua Technology
- Check Point Software vs Descope
- Check Point Software vs Drata
- Check Point Software vs DTiQ
- Check Point Software vs Ory Kratos
- Check Point Software vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Check Point Software vs Norton 360
- Check Point Software vs LastPass
- Check Point Software vs Private Internet Access
- Check Point Software vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Check Point Software vs Windscribe
- Check Point Software vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Check Point Software vs IBM QRadar
- Check Point Software vs Ping Identity
- Check Point Software vs OneTrust
- Check Point Software vs Transcend
- Check Point Software vs WireGuard
- Check Point Software vs Akeyless
- Check Point Software vs DataGrail
- Check Point Software vs Delinea
- Check Point Software vs Doppler
- Check Point Software vs Bitdefender VPN
