Softwr

Calendars · head to head

Assistant.to vs LiquidPlanner

Assistant.to logo

Assistant.to

Calendars

The easiest way to schedule meetings

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
LiquidPlanner logo

LiquidPlanner

Project Management

Predictive project management

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Assistant.to has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Assistant.to no publicly published pricing rates on website; LiquidPlanner rebranded to Tempo Portfolio Manager; the pricing page shows no published figures, only an early access sign-up
  • They diverge on capability: Assistant.to covers In-email scheduling, LiquidPlanner covers Predictive scheduling.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Assistant.to and LiquidPlanner actually diverge.

Attributes where Assistant.to and LiquidPlanner differ
AttributeAssistant.toLiquidPlanner
Starting priceFreeOn request
Pricing modelfreemiumsubscription
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsChrome-extensionWeb
CategoryCalendarsProject Management
Founded20142006

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Assistant.to

  • In-email scheduling
  • One-click booking
  • Google Calendar sync
  • Time zone handling
  • Simple interface
  • Gmail
  • Google Calendar
  • Chrome-extension support

Only in LiquidPlanner

  • Predictive scheduling
  • Resource management
  • Time tracking
  • Analytics
  • Workload management
  • Jira
  • Salesforce
  • Slack

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Assistant.to

  • Schedulingnot LiquidPlanner
  • Appointment bookingnot LiquidPlanner
  • Time trackingnot LiquidPlanner
  • Resource managementnot LiquidPlanner
  • Team coordinationnot LiquidPlanner

LiquidPlanner

  • Productivitynot Assistant.to
  • Collaborationnot Assistant.to
  • Task managementnot Assistant.to
  • Organizationnot Assistant.to

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Assistant.to

  • No publicly published pricing rates on website
  • Requires scheduling demo or contacting sales to obtain pricing information
  • Free trial available but no specific trial duration mentioned

LiquidPlanner

  • Rebranded to Tempo Portfolio Manager; the pricing page shows no published figures, only an early access sign-up

Pricing, plan by plan

Assistant.to

Free
  • FreeFree
    • In-email scheduling
    • Basic features
  • Pro$5/month
    • Team features
    • Custom branding
    • Priority support

LiquidPlanner

On request
  • Essentials$15/month
    • Project management
    • Basic scheduling
  • Professional$25/month
    • Predictive scheduling
    • Resource management
    • Analytics

Which should you pick?

Choose Assistant.to if

  • You need in-email scheduling.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Chrome-extension.
  • You also want one-click booking.
Assistant.to review

Choose LiquidPlanner if

  • You need predictive scheduling.
  • You also want resource management.
LiquidPlanner review

Questions people ask

Is Assistant.to or LiquidPlanner better?
Neither clearly leads. Assistant.to starts at Free and LiquidPlanner at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Assistant.to or LiquidPlanner?
Assistant.to has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Assistant.to and On request for LiquidPlanner.
Does Assistant.to or LiquidPlanner run on more platforms?
Assistant.to runs on Chrome-extension. LiquidPlanner runs on Web.
Can I use Assistant.to for free?
Yes. Assistant.to has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. LiquidPlanner starts at On request.
What is Assistant.to best used for?
Assistant.to is most often used for scheduling, appointment booking, time tracking, resource management. Of those, scheduling and appointment booking are not what LiquidPlanner is typically brought in for.
What can Assistant.to do that LiquidPlanner cannot?
Assistant.to covers In-email scheduling, One-click booking, Google Calendar sync, Time zone handling. LiquidPlanner covers Predictive scheduling, Resource management, Time tracking, Analytics.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Assistant.to: How much does Cirrus Insight (Assistant-to) cost?

Cirrus Insight does not publish specific pricing on its website. Pricing is customized based on your organization's needs. The platform offers a free trial and allows you to build a custom quote in the self-service hub or schedule a demo with the sales team.

Source
LiquidPlanner: How is Tempo timesheets pricing calculated for my organization?

Pricing is per-user per month and scales based on organization size. For 1-10 users: $1.00/user; 11-100 users: $5.21/user; 101-250 users: $3.66/user; scaling down to $0.25-$0.39/user for organizations with 5,000+ users.

Source
Assistant.to: How does Cirrus Insight pricing work with seat selection?

Cirrus Insight allows you to have full control over seat selection, meaning you can purchase different quantities of users for different features. For example, you could license 10 users for Email Sync and 5 users for Calendar Scheduling in the same account.

Source
LiquidPlanner: What license matching requirement exists for Tempo?

Your Tempo license size must match your Jira license size, with a user defined as anyone who can log into Jira.

Source
LiquidPlanner: Is there a free trial for Tempo timesheets?

Yes, Tempo offers a free trial available through the Atlassian Marketplace.

Source
LiquidPlanner: What deployment options are available for Tempo?

Both Cloud and Data Center deployment options are offered, with annual billing available.

Source
Share

Related pages

More on Assistant.to

More on LiquidPlanner

Keep looking

Other head to heads