Softwr

Calendars · head to head

Assistant.to vs Avoma

Assistant.to logo

Assistant.to

Calendars

The easiest way to schedule meetings

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Avoma logo

Avoma

Sales Enablement

Meeting assistant, scheduler and conversation intelligence sold as separate priced layers

From
$19/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Assistant.to has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Assistant.to no publicly published pricing rates on website; Avoma conversation Intelligence, the capability most buyers actually want, is a 29 US dollar per seat add-on rather than part of the plan, so the real cost of a working sales configuration is at least 53 per user per month against a 19 headline.
  • They diverge on capability: Assistant.to covers In-email scheduling, Avoma covers AI meeting assistant.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Assistant.to and Avoma actually diverge.

Attributes where Assistant.to and Avoma differ
AttributeAssistant.toAvoma
Starting priceFree$19/month
Pricing modelfreemiumPer user per month
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsChrome-extensionWeb, iOS, Android, Chrome extension
CategoryCalendarsSales Enablement
Founded2014Unknown

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Assistant.to

  • In-email scheduling
  • One-click booking
  • Google Calendar sync
  • Time zone handling
  • Simple interface
  • Gmail
  • Google Calendar
  • Chrome-extension support

Only in Avoma

  • AI meeting assistant
  • Custom note templates
  • Scheduling
  • CRM sync
  • Conversation intelligence
  • Revenue intelligence
  • Ask Avoma
  • Lead router

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Assistant.to

  • Schedulingnot Avoma
  • Appointment bookingnot Avoma
  • Time trackingnot Avoma
  • Resource managementnot Avoma
  • Team coordinationnot Avoma

Avoma

  • A ten-person sales team that wants CRM-ready call notes and booking links without buying a note-taker and a scheduler separatelynot Assistant.to
  • A customer success group that needs every renewal conversation summarised against a fixed template so handovers stop losing contextnot Assistant.to
  • A founder-led sales motion where the founder wants to review call recordings for coaching but cannot justify an enterprise conversation intelligence contractnot Assistant.to
  • A team with many internal attendees who only need a few people recording, since viewers and collaborators do not consume paid seatsnot Assistant.to

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Assistant.to

  • No publicly published pricing rates on website
  • Requires scheduling demo or contacting sales to obtain pricing information
  • Free trial available but no specific trial duration mentioned

Avoma

  • Conversation Intelligence, the capability most buyers actually want, is a 29 US dollar per seat add-on rather than part of the plan, so the real cost of a working sales configuration is at least 53 per user per month against a 19 headline.
  • Seat ceilings are baked into tiers, with Startup capped at 25 seats and Organization at 100, so growth forces a plan change for headcount reasons alone rather than feature reasons.
  • Conversation intelligence on the Organization tier is explicitly limited, meaning teams discover which parts are missing after they have committed to an annual contract.
  • Deal and forecast analytics are considerably shallower than dedicated revenue intelligence platforms, so an organisation that grows into serious pipeline inspection will replace the add-on rather than expand it.
  • Summary quality depends on the note template being maintained, and teams that never configure templates get generic recaps that nobody reads, which quietly turns the subscription into an expensive transcript archive.

Pricing, plan by plan

Assistant.to

Free
  • FreeFree
    • In-email scheduling
    • Basic features
  • Pro$5/month
    • Team features
    • Custom branding
    • Priority support

Avoma

$19/month
  • Startup$19/month
    • Up to 25 paid seats
    • Unlimited AI meeting assistant
    • Automatic recording and transcription
  • Organization$24/month
    • Up to 100 paid seats
    • Everything in Startup
    • Custom AI topics and templates
  • Enterprise$39/month
    • Minimum 10 paid seats
    • Everything in Organization
    • Org-wide Ask Avoma
  • Conversation Intelligence add-on$29/month
    • Per seat, on top of a base plan
    • Talk ratios and topic tracking
    • Keyword alerts and coaching

Which should you pick?

Choose Assistant.to if

  • You need in-email scheduling.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Chrome-extension.
  • You also want one-click booking.
Assistant.to review

Choose Avoma if

  • You need ai meeting assistant.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android, Chrome extension.
  • You also want custom note templates.
Avoma review

Questions people ask

Is Assistant.to or Avoma better?
Neither clearly leads. Assistant.to starts at Free and Avoma at $19/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Assistant.to or Avoma?
Assistant.to has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Assistant.to and $19/month for Avoma.
Does Assistant.to or Avoma run on more platforms?
Assistant.to runs on Chrome-extension. Avoma runs on Web, iOS, Android, Chrome extension.
Can I use Assistant.to for free?
Yes. Assistant.to has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Avoma starts at $19/month.
What is Assistant.to best used for?
Assistant.to is most often used for scheduling, appointment booking, time tracking, resource management. Of those, scheduling and appointment booking are not what Avoma is typically brought in for.
What can Assistant.to do that Avoma cannot?
Assistant.to covers In-email scheduling, One-click booking, Google Calendar sync, Time zone handling. Avoma covers AI meeting assistant, Custom note templates, Scheduling, CRM sync.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Assistant.to: How much does Cirrus Insight (Assistant-to) cost?

Cirrus Insight does not publish specific pricing on its website. Pricing is customized based on your organization's needs. The platform offers a free trial and allows you to build a custom quote in the self-service hub or schedule a demo with the sales team.

Source
Avoma: Is 19 US dollars the real price?

Only for the base meeting assistant on annual billing. Adding Conversation Intelligence takes it to 53 per user per month, and Revenue Intelligence takes it to 82.

Assistant.to: How does Cirrus Insight pricing work with seat selection?

Cirrus Insight allows you to have full control over seat selection, meaning you can purchase different quantities of users for different features. For example, you could license 10 users for Email Sync and 5 users for Calendar Scheduling in the same account.

Source
Avoma: Do I pay for people who only watch recordings?

No. Viewers and collaborators are free. Paid seats are only required for users whose own meetings are recorded.

Avoma: Does it replace my scheduling tool?

For most teams, yes. Group and round-robin booking arrive on the Organization tier; Startup includes 1:1 links only.

Avoma: Is it a Gong replacement?

Not at the enterprise end. Avoma covers the common conversation intelligence use cases at a fraction of the price but does not match Gong on deal analytics or coaching depth.

Share

Related pages

More on Assistant.to

More on Avoma

Keep looking

Other head to heads