Construction · head to head
ArchiCAD vs Kojo

Kojo
Construction
Materials procurement and inventory for speciality trade contractors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ArchiCAD available on Windows and macOS only, no native Linux support; Kojo benefits depend on distributors providing electronic catalogues and pricing, and a contractor whose main supplier will not participate is left keying quotes by hand.
- They diverge on capability: ArchiCAD covers BIM modeling, Kojo covers Field material requests.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ArchiCAD and Kojo actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ArchiCAD
- BIM modeling
- Design tools
- Documentation
- Rendering
- Energy analysis
- IFC support
- Teamwork collaboration
- Library parts
Only in Kojo
- Field material requests
- Multi-supplier quoting
- Purchase order management
- Inventory and warehouse
- Committed cost visibility
- Enterprise resource planning integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ArchiCAD
- Architectural design with BIM capabilitiesnot Kojo
- Real-time team collaboration via BIMcloudnot Kojo
- Automated documentation generation from design changesnot Kojo
- Mixed Windows and macOS team environmentsnot Kojo
Kojo
- An electrical or mechanical contractor where materials are close to half of job cost and buying happens dailynot ArchiCAD
- A trade contractor that cannot see committed material cost against a job until the invoice arrivesnot ArchiCAD
- A contractor consolidating purchasing across branches to negotiate better distributor pricingnot ArchiCAD
- A subcontractor tracking warehouse stock and job transfers that currently live in a spreadsheetnot ArchiCAD
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ArchiCAD
- Available on Windows and macOS only, no native Linux support
- Subscription-only licensing model with no perpetual licence option
- Studio tier does not include MEP Designer - requires Collaborate tier at $208/month
Kojo
- Benefits depend on distributors providing electronic catalogues and pricing, and a contractor whose main supplier will not participate is left keying quotes by hand.
- It serves speciality trade contractors; general contractors procure subcontracts rather than materials and get almost nothing from it.
- Enterprise resource planning integration quality varies by system and version, so confirm the depth for your exact configuration rather than accepting the logo on the website.
- Field adoption is the whole game, and foremen who lose signal in a plant room or basement revert to phoning the office within days unless offline capture genuinely works.
- It changes purchasing process as well as software, so contractors whose buying authority is informal have to formalise who can commit money before the system produces clean data.
Pricing, plan by plan
ArchiCAD
$177/month- Archicad Studio$177/month
- Archicad Windows & macOS
- BIMx Pro
- BIMcloud Basic
- Archicad Collaborate$208/month
- Archicad Windows & macOS
- MEP Designer
- BIMx Pro
Kojo
On request- Kojo$undefined/year
- Materials procurement workflow
- Supplier quoting and purchase orders
- Inventory tracking
Which should you pick?
Choose ArchiCAD if
- You need bim modeling.
- You work on Windows, macOS.
- You also want design tools.
Choose Kojo if
- You need field material requests.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want multi-supplier quoting.
Questions people ask
- Is ArchiCAD or Kojo better?
- Neither clearly leads. ArchiCAD starts at $177/month and Kojo at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ArchiCAD or Kojo?
- ArchiCAD starts at $177/month and Kojo at On request.
- Does ArchiCAD or Kojo run on more platforms?
- ArchiCAD runs on Windows, macOS. Kojo runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is ArchiCAD best used for?
- ArchiCAD is most often used for architectural design with bim capabilities, real-time team collaboration via bimcloud, automated documentation generation from design changes, mixed windows and macos team environments. Of those, architectural design with bim capabilities and real-time team collaboration via bimcloud are not what Kojo is typically brought in for.
- What can ArchiCAD do that Kojo cannot?
- ArchiCAD covers BIM modeling, Design tools, Documentation, Rendering. Kojo covers Field material requests, Multi-supplier quoting, Purchase order management, Inventory and warehouse.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ArchiCAD: What is the cost of Archicad's subscription plans?
Archicad Studio starts at $177/month or $2,123 upfront annually. Archicad Collaborate, the most popular tier, is $208/month or $2,497 upfront annually. Both include local and cloud teamworking capabilities.
SourceKojo: Is this for general contractors?
No. It is built for speciality trade contractors buying materials. General contractors procure subcontracts and would get little from it.
ArchiCAD: What is the difference between Archicad Studio and Archicad Collaborate?
Studio includes architectural modeling and BIMcloud Basic for local teamwork. Collaborate adds MEP Designer for MEP modeling and BIMcloud SaaS for cloud-based global teamwork, and costs $31 more per month.
SourceKojo: What if our suppliers will not connect?
You lose most of the quoting benefit and keep only the internal workflow. Check distributor participation before purchase, because it determines the return.
ArchiCAD: Is Archicad free for students?
Yes, Archicad offers free educational licenses for students, educators, and academic institutions. Archicad Studio is available free for 30 days as a trial.
SourceKojo: Does it work without signal on site?
Field requests are designed for site use, and offline behaviour should be tested with your own crews in your worst locations, because that is where adoption is won or lost.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- ArchiCAD vs Autodesk Revit
- ArchiCAD vs Vectorworks Architect
- ArchiCAD vs BricsCAD BIM
- ArchiCAD vs SketchUp
- ArchiCAD vs Chief Architect
- ArchiCAD vs Houzz Pro
- ArchiCAD vs Procore
- ArchiCAD vs PlanSwift
- ArchiCAD vs Bluebeam Revu
- ArchiCAD vs Buildertrend
- ArchiCAD vs ConstructConnect
- ArchiCAD vs Cubit Estimating
- ArchiCAD vs Dalux
- ArchiCAD vs e-Builder
- ArchiCAD vs Revit
- ArchiCAD vs Trimble
- ArchiCAD vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- ArchiCAD vs BuildingConnected
- ArchiCAD vs Foundation Software
- ArchiCAD vs Knowify
- ArchiCAD vs Siteline
- ArchiCAD vs Assignar
- ArchiCAD vs Clearstory
- ArchiCAD vs GCPay
- ArchiCAD vs Document Crunch
- ArchiCAD vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- ArchiCAD vs Bridgit Bravo
- ArchiCAD vs Trimble Pay
- ArchiCAD vs HammerTech
- ArchiCAD vs Handoff
- ArchiCAD vs HCSS HeavyBid
- ArchiCAD vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- ArchiCAD vs JobTread
- Kojo vs Autodesk Revit
- Kojo vs Vectorworks Architect
- Kojo vs BricsCAD BIM
- Kojo vs SketchUp
- Kojo vs Chief Architect
- Kojo vs Houzz Pro
- Kojo vs Procore
- Kojo vs PlanSwift
- Kojo vs Bluebeam Revu
- Kojo vs Buildertrend
- Kojo vs ConstructConnect
- Kojo vs Cubit Estimating
- Kojo vs Dalux
- Kojo vs e-Builder
- Kojo vs Revit
- Kojo vs Trimble
- Kojo vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- Kojo vs BuildingConnected
- Kojo vs Foundation Software
- Kojo vs Knowify
- Kojo vs Siteline
- Kojo vs Assignar
- Kojo vs Clearstory
- Kojo vs GCPay
- Kojo vs Document Crunch
- Kojo vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Kojo vs Bridgit Bravo
- Kojo vs Trimble Pay
- Kojo vs HammerTech
- Kojo vs Handoff
- Kojo vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Kojo vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- Kojo vs JobTread

