Databases · head to head
ArangoDB vs ScyllaDB

ArangoDB
Databases
Multi-model database for graph, document, and search
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

ScyllaDB
Databases
The real-time big data database compatible with Cassandra
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ArangoDB the company has repositioned around a wider platform, so ArangoDB is now described as the foundation inside Arango rather than the product itself; ScyllaDB enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales
- They diverge on capability: ArangoDB covers Multi-model Support, ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ArangoDB and ScyllaDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ArangoDB
- Multi-model Support
- AQL Query Language
- Graph Traversals
- Full-text Search
- ACID Transactions
- SmartGraphs
- Satellite Collections
- Foxx Microservices
Only in ScyllaDB
- Cassandra Compatible
- DynamoDB Compatible
- 10x Throughput
- Low Latency
- Auto-tuning
- Lightweight Transactions
- Change Data Capture
- Cassandra Drivers
Both cover
- Kafka
- Spark
- Kubernetes
- Linux support
- Docker support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ArangoDB
- Graph, document and key-value data in one databasenot ScyllaDB
- Vector and full-text search alongside graph traversalnot ScyllaDB
- Avoiding separate stores for related and unstructured datanot ScyllaDB
- Backing AI applications needing both graph context and vectorsnot ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
- Real-time applicationsnot ArangoDB
- Content managementnot ArangoDB
- User profilesnot ArangoDB
- Mobile backendsnot ArangoDB
- Cachingnot ArangoDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ArangoDB
- The company has repositioned around a wider platform, so ArangoDB is now described as the foundation inside Arango rather than the product itself
- Neither the community licence terms nor cloud pricing are stated on the main site
- arangodb.com redirects to arango.ai
ScyllaDB
- Enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales
- Pricing varies by cloud provider, storage, and instance configuration
- Contracts available but commitment required for subscription discounts
Pricing, plan by plan
ArangoDB
Free- CommunityFree
- All data models
- AQL queries
- Full-text search
- ArangoGraph$99/month
- Managed service
- Graph analytics
- Enterprise support
ScyllaDB
Free- ScyllaDB Cloud Standard$null/variable
- Usage-based billing: vCPU, RAM, NVMe SSD storage
- 2-hour P1 support response time
- 99.9% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB Cloud Professional$null/variable
- Enterprise-grade scalability
- 1-hour P1 support response
- Enhanced features included
- ScyllaDB Cloud Premium$null/variable
- Custom security and networking
- 15-minute P1 support response
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB Enterprise$null/quote
- Self-managed deployment
- On-premise or private cloud
- Custom quote required
Which should you pick?
Choose ArangoDB if
- You need multi-model support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want aql query language.
Choose ScyllaDB if
- You need cassandra compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want dynamodb compatible.
Questions people ask
- Is ArangoDB or ScyllaDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. ArangoDB starts at Free and ScyllaDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ArangoDB or ScyllaDB?
- ArangoDB starts at Free and ScyllaDB at Free.
- Does ArangoDB or ScyllaDB run on more platforms?
- ArangoDB runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web. ScyllaDB runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- Can I use ArangoDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is ArangoDB best used for?
- ArangoDB is most often used for graph, document and key-value data in one database, vector and full-text search alongside graph traversal, avoiding separate stores for related and unstructured data, backing ai applications needing both graph context and vectors. Of those, graph, document and key-value data in one database and vector and full-text search alongside graph traversal are not what ScyllaDB is typically brought in for.
- What can ArangoDB do that ScyllaDB cannot?
- ArangoDB covers Multi-model Support, AQL Query Language, Graph Traversals, Full-text Search. ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible, DynamoDB Compatible, 10x Throughput, Low Latency. Both handle Kafka, Spark, Kubernetes, Linux support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ArangoDB: How is ArangoDB priced?
ArangoDB offers Community Edition (free) and Enterprise Edition. Pricing is customized based on deployment model (self-managed, managed cloud AWS/GCP, or OEM/embedded) and customer requirements. Contact Arango for a quote.
SourceScyllaDB: How is ScyllaDB Cloud pricing calculated?
ScyllaDB Cloud uses transparent, resource-based billing based on instance type (vCPU and RAM), NVMe SSD storage, service plan tier, deployment model, and cloud provider costs.
SourceArangoDB: What deployment options does ArangoDB offer?
ArangoDB can be deployed self-managed on customer infrastructure, as managed cloud (Arango Managed Platform on AWS/GCP), or as OEM/embedded solutions.
SourceScyllaDB: Does ScyllaDB offer a free trial?
ScyllaDB offers a 30-day developer trial on smaller instances and a 48-hour production evaluation trial with full-grade instances.
SourceScyllaDB: What cost savings are available for long-term ScyllaDB commitments?
ScyllaDB subscription contracts provide up to 70% or more in savings compared to on-demand hourly billing. 1-year and 3-year contract options are available.
SourceScyllaDB: How much cheaper is ScyllaDB than DynamoDB?
Unlike DynamoDB which charges per read/write unit, ScyllaDB charges based on resource usage only, potentially delivering 50% or greater cost reduction for high-throughput workloads.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- ArangoDB vs Cockroach Labs
- ArangoDB vs Airtable
- ArangoDB vs PostgreSQL
- ArangoDB vs Amazon Aurora
- ArangoDB vs RavenDB
- ArangoDB vs CouchDB
- ArangoDB vs Neo4j
- ArangoDB vs Dgraph
- ArangoDB vs Couchbase
- ArangoDB vs CosmosDB
- ArangoDB vs Elasticsearch
- ArangoDB vs Firebolt
- ArangoDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- ArangoDB vs QuestDB
- ArangoDB vs Vitess
- ArangoDB vs Aiven
- ArangoDB vs DynamoDB
- ArangoDB vs Microsoft SQL Server
- ArangoDB vs Cassandra
- ArangoDB vs DataStax
- ArangoDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- ArangoDB vs DataGrip
- ArangoDB vs turbopuffer
- ArangoDB vs VerneMQ
- ArangoDB vs Vespa
- ArangoDB vs Xata
- ArangoDB vs YugabyteDB
- ArangoDB vs Zilliz
- ScyllaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- ScyllaDB vs Airtable
- ScyllaDB vs PostgreSQL
- ScyllaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- ScyllaDB vs RavenDB
- ScyllaDB vs CouchDB
- ScyllaDB vs Neo4j
- ScyllaDB vs Dgraph
- ScyllaDB vs Couchbase
- ScyllaDB vs CosmosDB
- ScyllaDB vs Elasticsearch
- ScyllaDB vs Firebolt
- ScyllaDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- ScyllaDB vs QuestDB
- ScyllaDB vs Vitess
- ScyllaDB vs Aiven
- ScyllaDB vs DynamoDB
- ScyllaDB vs Microsoft SQL Server
- ScyllaDB vs Cassandra
- ScyllaDB vs DataStax
- ScyllaDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- ScyllaDB vs DataGrip
- ScyllaDB vs turbopuffer
- ScyllaDB vs VerneMQ
- ScyllaDB vs Vespa
- ScyllaDB vs Xata
- ScyllaDB vs YugabyteDB
- ScyllaDB vs Zilliz
