Databases · head to head
ScyllaDB vs Zilliz

ScyllaDB
Databases
The real-time big data database compatible with Cassandra
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Zilliz
Databases
Managed vector database and vector lakebase for AI applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ScyllaDB enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales; Zilliz pricing structure not publicly disclosed, requires sales contact
- They diverge on capability: ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible, Zilliz covers Vector indexing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ScyllaDB and Zilliz actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ScyllaDB
- Cassandra Compatible
- DynamoDB Compatible
- 10x Throughput
- Low Latency
- Auto-tuning
- Lightweight Transactions
- Change Data Capture
- Cassandra Drivers
Only in Zilliz
- Vector indexing
- Distributed architecture
- SQL interface
- Tensor support
- Real-time search
- Cloud-native
- Open-source compatible
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ScyllaDB
- Real-time applicationsnot Zilliz
- Content managementnot Zilliz
- User profilesnot Zilliz
- Mobile backendsnot Zilliz
- Cachingnot Zilliz
Zilliz
- Build retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systemsnot ScyllaDB
- Implement semantic search over documentsnot ScyllaDB
- Create multimodal search with text and imagesnot ScyllaDB
- Power recommendation engines with vector similaritynot ScyllaDB
- Enable similarity search on user embeddingsnot ScyllaDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ScyllaDB
- Enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales
- Pricing varies by cloud provider, storage, and instance configuration
- Contracts available but commitment required for subscription discounts
Zilliz
- Pricing structure not publicly disclosed, requires sales contact
- Operational complexity for self-hosted Milvus deployments
- Learning curve for those unfamiliar with vector databases
- Limited built-in analytics compared to some alternatives
Pricing, plan by plan
ScyllaDB
Free- ScyllaDB Cloud Standard$null/variable
- Usage-based billing: vCPU, RAM, NVMe SSD storage
- 2-hour P1 support response time
- 99.9% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB Cloud Professional$null/variable
- Enterprise-grade scalability
- 1-hour P1 support response
- Enhanced features included
- ScyllaDB Cloud Premium$null/variable
- Custom security and networking
- 15-minute P1 support response
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB Enterprise$null/quote
- Self-managed deployment
- On-premise or private cloud
- Custom quote required
Zilliz
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Zilliz review.
Which should you pick?
Choose ScyllaDB if
- You need cassandra compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want dynamodb compatible.
Choose Zilliz if
- You need vector indexing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Self-hosted.
- You also want distributed architecture.
Questions people ask
- Is ScyllaDB or Zilliz better?
- Neither clearly leads. ScyllaDB starts at Free and Zilliz at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ScyllaDB or Zilliz?
- ScyllaDB starts at Free and Zilliz at Free.
- Does ScyllaDB or Zilliz run on more platforms?
- ScyllaDB runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web. Zilliz runs on Cloud, Self-hosted.
- Can I use ScyllaDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is ScyllaDB best used for?
- ScyllaDB is most often used for real-time applications, content management, user profiles, mobile backends. Of those, real-time applications and content management are not what Zilliz is typically brought in for.
- What can ScyllaDB do that Zilliz cannot?
- ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible, DynamoDB Compatible, 10x Throughput, Low Latency. Zilliz covers Vector indexing, Distributed architecture, SQL interface, Tensor support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ScyllaDB: How is ScyllaDB Cloud pricing calculated?
ScyllaDB Cloud uses transparent, resource-based billing based on instance type (vCPU and RAM), NVMe SSD storage, service plan tier, deployment model, and cloud provider costs.
SourceZilliz: What is the difference between Milvus and Zilliz Cloud?
Milvus is the open-source vector database that you can self-host. Zilliz Cloud is the fully managed service built on Milvus that removes operational overhead and handles scaling automatically.
SourceScyllaDB: Does ScyllaDB offer a free trial?
ScyllaDB offers a 30-day developer trial on smaller instances and a 48-hour production evaluation trial with full-grade instances.
SourceZilliz: How many vectors can Zilliz handle?
Milvus and Zilliz Cloud can store and search billions of vectors through their distributed architecture that separates storage and compute layers.
SourceScyllaDB: What cost savings are available for long-term ScyllaDB commitments?
ScyllaDB subscription contracts provide up to 70% or more in savings compared to on-demand hourly billing. 1-year and 3-year contract options are available.
SourceZilliz: Is Milvus open-source?
Yes, Milvus is open-source under the Apache License 2.0 and is part of the LF AI & Data Foundation.
SourceScyllaDB: How much cheaper is ScyllaDB than DynamoDB?
Unlike DynamoDB which charges per read/write unit, ScyllaDB charges based on resource usage only, potentially delivering 50% or greater cost reduction for high-throughput workloads.
SourceZilliz: What pricing does Zilliz Cloud offer?
Zilliz Cloud pricing is not publicly listed and requires contacting their team to discuss your specific scale and use case requirements.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- ScyllaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- ScyllaDB vs Airtable
- ScyllaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- ScyllaDB vs PostgreSQL
- ScyllaDB vs Cassandra
- ScyllaDB vs Couchbase
- ScyllaDB vs DataStax
- ScyllaDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- ScyllaDB vs RavenDB
- ScyllaDB vs DataGrip
- ScyllaDB vs turbopuffer
- ScyllaDB vs VerneMQ
- ScyllaDB vs Vespa
- ScyllaDB vs Xata
- ScyllaDB vs YugabyteDB
- ScyllaDB vs DynamoDB
- ScyllaDB vs CouchDB
- ScyllaDB vs Qdrant
- ScyllaDB vs Marqo
- ScyllaDB vs Elasticsearch
- ScyllaDB vs Meilisearch
- ScyllaDB vs Typesense
- ScyllaDB vs Materialize
- ScyllaDB vs OpenSearch
- ScyllaDB vs Apache Solr
- ScyllaDB vs Readyset
- ScyllaDB vs SurrealDB
- ScyllaDB vs StarRocks
- ScyllaDB vs Teradata
- ScyllaDB vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- ScyllaDB vs Timeplus
- Zilliz vs Amazon Aurora
- Zilliz vs Airtable
- Zilliz vs Cockroach Labs
- Zilliz vs PostgreSQL
- Zilliz vs Cassandra
- Zilliz vs Couchbase
- Zilliz vs DataStax
- Zilliz vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Zilliz vs RavenDB
- Zilliz vs DataGrip
- Zilliz vs turbopuffer
- Zilliz vs VerneMQ
- Zilliz vs Vespa
- Zilliz vs Xata
- Zilliz vs YugabyteDB
- Zilliz vs DynamoDB
- Zilliz vs CouchDB
- Zilliz vs Qdrant
- Zilliz vs Marqo
- Zilliz vs Elasticsearch
- Zilliz vs Meilisearch
- Zilliz vs Typesense
- Zilliz vs Materialize
- Zilliz vs OpenSearch
- Zilliz vs Apache Solr
- Zilliz vs Readyset
- Zilliz vs SurrealDB
- Zilliz vs StarRocks
- Zilliz vs Teradata
- Zilliz vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Zilliz vs Timeplus
