Databases · head to head
Firebolt vs ScyllaDB

Firebolt
Databases
Sub-second analytics at cloud data warehouse scale
- From
- $1.84/hour
- Rated
- -

ScyllaDB
Databases
The real-time big data database compatible with Cassandra
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only ScyllaDB has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Firebolt compute billed per second on Arm-based processors; small instances still incur measurable costs during idle periods despite auto-stop; ScyllaDB enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales
- They diverge on capability: Firebolt covers Sub-second Queries, ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Firebolt and ScyllaDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (usage-based), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Firebolt
- Sub-second Queries
- Sparse Indexes
- Data Pruning
- Decoupled Storage/Compute
- SQL Support
- Semi-structured Data
- Workload Isolation
- Airflow
Only in ScyllaDB
- Cassandra Compatible
- DynamoDB Compatible
- 10x Throughput
- Low Latency
- Auto-tuning
- Lightweight Transactions
- Change Data Capture
- Cassandra Drivers
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Firebolt
- Data analytics teams running gigabyte-to-petabyte datasets with sub-second query requirementsnot ScyllaDB
- Real-time business intelligence platforms requiring ACID transactions and snapshot isolationnot ScyllaDB
- Applications needing vector search on analytical data for similarity queriesnot ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
- Real-time applicationsnot Firebolt
- Content managementnot Firebolt
- User profilesnot Firebolt
- Mobile backendsnot Firebolt
- Cachingnot Firebolt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Firebolt
- Compute billed per second on Arm-based processors; small instances still incur measurable costs during idle periods despite auto-stop
- Storage pass-through charged at $0.0264/GB monthly on compressed data; uncompressed storage could exceed this
- Azure deployment currently in Preview status; production recommendations unclear
- Vector indexes limited to float arrays; other data types require alternative indexing strategies
- Free tier credits ($200) limited; no perpetual free tier for production use
ScyllaDB
- Enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales
- Pricing varies by cloud provider, storage, and instance configuration
- Contracts available but commitment required for subscription discounts
Pricing, plan by plan
Firebolt
$1.84/hourNo published plan breakdown. See the Firebolt review.
ScyllaDB
Free- ScyllaDB Cloud Standard$null/variable
- Usage-based billing: vCPU, RAM, NVMe SSD storage
- 2-hour P1 support response time
- 99.9% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB Cloud Professional$null/variable
- Enterprise-grade scalability
- 1-hour P1 support response
- Enhanced features included
- ScyllaDB Cloud Premium$null/variable
- Custom security and networking
- 15-minute P1 support response
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB Enterprise$null/quote
- Self-managed deployment
- On-premise or private cloud
- Custom quote required
Which should you pick?
Choose Firebolt if
- You need sub-second queries.
- You work on Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure preview), Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want sparse indexes.
Choose ScyllaDB if
- You need cassandra compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want dynamodb compatible.
Questions people ask
- Is Firebolt or ScyllaDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Firebolt starts at $1.84/hour and ScyllaDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Firebolt or ScyllaDB?
- ScyllaDB has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $1.84/hour for Firebolt and Free for ScyllaDB.
- Does Firebolt or ScyllaDB run on more platforms?
- Firebolt runs on Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure preview), Docker, Kubernetes. ScyllaDB runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- Can I use ScyllaDB for free?
- Yes. ScyllaDB has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Firebolt starts at $1.84/hour.
- What is Firebolt best used for?
- Firebolt is most often used for data analytics teams running gigabyte-to-petabyte datasets with sub-second query requirements, real-time business intelligence platforms requiring acid transactions and snapshot isolation, applications needing vector search on analytical data for similarity queries. Of those, data analytics teams running gigabyte-to-petabyte datasets with sub-second query requirements and real-time business intelligence platforms requiring acid transactions and snapshot isolation are not what ScyllaDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Firebolt do that ScyllaDB cannot?
- Firebolt covers Sub-second Queries, Sparse Indexes, Data Pruning, Decoupled Storage/Compute. ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible, DynamoDB Compatible, 10x Throughput, Low Latency. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Firebolt: How does Firebolt's compute billing model work?
Firebolt uses per-second billing with scale-to-zero capability. The smallest S tier costs $1.84 per hour with 8 vCPU and 64GB memory, while the largest 4XL tier costs $58.88 per hour with 256 vCPU. Users only pay when compute is running.
SourceScyllaDB: How is ScyllaDB Cloud pricing calculated?
ScyllaDB Cloud uses transparent, resource-based billing based on instance type (vCPU and RAM), NVMe SSD storage, service plan tier, deployment model, and cloud provider costs.
SourceFirebolt: What is the cost for data storage on Firebolt?
Storage costs $0.0264 per GB per month on object storage, billed as pass-through cost at cloud provider rates.
SourceScyllaDB: Does ScyllaDB offer a free trial?
ScyllaDB offers a 30-day developer trial on smaller instances and a 48-hour production evaluation trial with full-grade instances.
SourceFirebolt: What free credits or trial does Firebolt offer new users?
New users receive $200 free credits to get started with the platform.
SourceScyllaDB: What cost savings are available for long-term ScyllaDB commitments?
ScyllaDB subscription contracts provide up to 70% or more in savings compared to on-demand hourly billing. 1-year and 3-year contract options are available.
SourceFirebolt: Does Firebolt publish pricing for commitment-based discounts?
The pricing FAQ lists a question about commitment-based discounts but does not provide published answers on the pricing page. This requires direct inquiry with sales.
SourceScyllaDB: How much cheaper is ScyllaDB than DynamoDB?
Unlike DynamoDB which charges per read/write unit, ScyllaDB charges based on resource usage only, potentially delivering 50% or greater cost reduction for high-throughput workloads.
SourceFirebolt: What deployment options does Firebolt offer besides managed service?
Firebolt offers self-hosted open source deployment (unlimited) and Bring Your Own Cloud (BYOC) options in addition to managed service.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Firebolt vs BigQuery
- Firebolt vs Amazon Redshift
- Firebolt vs Airtable
- Firebolt vs Cockroach Labs
- Firebolt vs PostgreSQL
- Firebolt vs Apache Druid
- Firebolt vs DuckDB
- Firebolt vs QuestDB
- Firebolt vs MotherDuck
- Firebolt vs ClickHouse
- Firebolt vs dbt
- Firebolt vs EMQX
- Firebolt vs FaunaDB
- Firebolt vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Firebolt vs Memcached
- Firebolt vs Amazon Aurora
- Firebolt vs Apache Pinot
- Firebolt vs Firestore
- Firebolt vs Cassandra
- Firebolt vs Couchbase
- Firebolt vs DataStax
- Firebolt vs RavenDB
- Firebolt vs DataGrip
- Firebolt vs turbopuffer
- Firebolt vs VerneMQ
- Firebolt vs Vespa
- Firebolt vs Xata
- Firebolt vs YugabyteDB
- Firebolt vs Zilliz
- Firebolt vs DynamoDB
- Firebolt vs CouchDB
- ScyllaDB vs BigQuery
- ScyllaDB vs Amazon Redshift
- ScyllaDB vs Airtable
- ScyllaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- ScyllaDB vs PostgreSQL
- ScyllaDB vs Apache Druid
- ScyllaDB vs DuckDB
- ScyllaDB vs QuestDB
- ScyllaDB vs MotherDuck
- ScyllaDB vs ClickHouse
- ScyllaDB vs dbt
- ScyllaDB vs EMQX
- ScyllaDB vs FaunaDB
- ScyllaDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- ScyllaDB vs Memcached
- ScyllaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- ScyllaDB vs Apache Pinot
- ScyllaDB vs Firestore
- ScyllaDB vs Cassandra
- ScyllaDB vs Couchbase
- ScyllaDB vs DataStax
- ScyllaDB vs RavenDB
- ScyllaDB vs DataGrip
- ScyllaDB vs turbopuffer
- ScyllaDB vs VerneMQ
- ScyllaDB vs Vespa
- ScyllaDB vs Xata
- ScyllaDB vs YugabyteDB
- ScyllaDB vs Zilliz
- ScyllaDB vs DynamoDB
- ScyllaDB vs CouchDB
