Technology · head to head
Safari vs Keycloak
Safari
Technology
Apple's WebKit browser, available only on Apple operating systems and updated only with them.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Safari it runs only on Apple operating systems; there has been no Windows build since 2012 and none for Linux or Android, so any team that must verify Safari behaviour has to buy Mac hardware or rent it from a device cloud, which is a line item Chrome and Firefox do not create.; Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Safari and Keycloak actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Safari
- WebKit engine
- Intelligent Tracking Prevention
- Energy optimisation
- iCloud Private Relay
- Passkeys in iCloud Keychain
- Handoff and tab sync
- Profiles and Tab Groups
- Web Inspector
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Safari does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Safari
- Getting the longest battery life out of a MacBook, where the difference against Chromium browsers is hours rather than minutesnot Keycloak
- Debugging a site on a real iPhone or iPad, which requires Safari's Web Inspector connected over USB from a Macnot Keycloak
- An all-Apple household or team that wants tabs, passwords and passkeys to follow them across devices without a third-party accountnot Keycloak
- Privacy-conscious users on iCloud+ who want tracking protection and Private Relay working by default rather than through extensionsnot Keycloak
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Safari
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Safari
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Safari
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Safari
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Safari
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Safari
- It runs only on Apple operating systems; there has been no Windows build since 2012 and none for Linux or Android, so any team that must verify Safari behaviour has to buy Mac hardware or rent it from a device cloud, which is a line item Chrome and Firefox do not create.
- Safari's version is bound to the operating system's version, so a Mac that has fallen off the supported macOS list stops receiving Safari updates altogether; the browser's security life is the machine's OS life, roughly three years of updates after the last major release it can run.
- Distributing an extension means packaging it inside a signed macOS application and shipping it through the App Store with a paid Apple Developer Program membership, which makes a small internal or single-team extension impractical.
- Automated testing uses safaridriver, which runs on macOS only, has no headless mode and permits one session per machine, so Safari coverage in CI means real Macs in the pipeline rather than containers, and it does not parallelise the way Chromium does.
- Web platform features generally land in WebKit later than in Blink and Gecko, so Safari's current support is in practice the compatibility floor for any project, and a feature you can use everywhere else may be a year away here.
- Enterprise management is thin: configuration profiles cover a modest set of settings with nothing comparable to the several hundred administrative policies Chrome and Edge expose, so a managed fleet cannot control Safari to the same degree.
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Pricing, plan by plan
Safari
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Safari review.
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Safari if
- You need webkit engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want intelligent tracking prevention.
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Questions people ask
- Is Safari or Keycloak better?
- Neither clearly leads. Safari starts at Free and Keycloak at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Safari or Keycloak?
- Safari starts at Free and Keycloak at Free.
- Does Safari or Keycloak run on more platforms?
- Safari runs on Web. Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
- Can I use Safari for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Safari best used for?
- Safari is most often used for getting the longest battery life out of a macbook, where the difference against chromium browsers is hours rather than minutes, debugging a site on a real iphone or ipad, which requires safari's web inspector connected over usb from a mac, an all-apple household or team that wants tabs, passwords and passkeys to follow them across devices without a third-party account, privacy-conscious users on icloud+ who want tracking protection and private relay working by default rather than through extensions. Of those, getting the longest battery life out of a macbook, where the difference against chromium browsers is hours rather than minutes and debugging a site on a real iphone or ipad, which requires safari's web inspector connected over usb from a mac are not what Keycloak is typically brought in for.
- What can Safari do that Keycloak cannot?
- Safari covers WebKit engine, Intelligent Tracking Prevention, Energy optimisation, iCloud Private Relay.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Safari: Can I run Safari on Windows or Linux?
No. The last Windows version was Safari 5.1.7 in 2012 and it is long unsupported. There has never been a Linux build. Testing Safari requires macOS, either your own or a rented cloud device.
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceSafari: How do I test my site in Safari without a Mac?
Through a cloud device farm such as BrowserStack, Sauce Labs or LambdaTest, which run real macOS and iOS instances. There is no reliable local emulation, because other browsers on Windows and Linux do not use WebKit.
Keycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceSafari: Are other iPhone browsers really different from Safari?
Historically no: Apple required all iOS browsers to use WebKit, so Chrome and Firefox on iPhone were interface shells around Safari's engine. The EU's Digital Markets Act now permits alternative engines, but adoption is limited, so in practice iOS testing still means WebKit.
Keycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceSafari: Why does Safari not get a new version on my old Mac?
Safari ships with the operating system. When a Mac can no longer run a macOS version that Apple still updates, Safari stops updating too, including its security fixes.
Safari: What does it cost?
Nothing. It is included with Apple operating systems. Private Relay requires an iCloud+ subscription, and publishing an extension requires a paid Apple Developer Program membership.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Safari vs Microsoft Edge
- Safari vs Mozilla Firefox
- Safari vs Google Chrome
- Safari vs Trino
- Safari vs Apache Spark
- Safari vs GitHub Desktop
- Safari vs ClickUp
- Safari vs Intercom
- Safari vs Monday.com
- Safari vs Maze
- Safari vs PyCharm
- Safari vs MongoDB
- Safari vs Nagios XI
- Safari vs Postgres
- Safari vs Shortcut
- Safari vs Site24x7
- Safari vs Microsoft Outlook
- Safari vs MongoDB Atlas
- Safari vs Penpot
- Safari vs Soketi
- Safari vs Ansible
- Safari vs Atlantis
- Safari vs Vite
- Safari vs Depot
- Safari vs Pants Build
- Safari vs Buildkite
- Safari vs Coder
- Safari vs Jitsu
- Safari vs Bitbucket
- Safari vs Sweep
- Safari vs Azure DevOps
- Safari vs Backstage
- Safari vs Claude Code
- Safari vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Safari vs Cody
- Keycloak vs Microsoft Edge
- Keycloak vs Mozilla Firefox
- Keycloak vs Google Chrome
- Keycloak vs Trino
- Keycloak vs Apache Spark
- Keycloak vs GitHub Desktop
- Keycloak vs ClickUp
- Keycloak vs Intercom
- Keycloak vs Monday.com
- Keycloak vs Maze
- Keycloak vs PyCharm
- Keycloak vs MongoDB
- Keycloak vs Nagios XI
- Keycloak vs Postgres
- Keycloak vs Shortcut
- Keycloak vs Site24x7
- Keycloak vs Microsoft Outlook
- Keycloak vs MongoDB Atlas
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Pants Build
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Jitsu
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody