Developer Tools · head to head
Keycloak vs MongoDB Atlas

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

MongoDB Atlas
Technology
The multi-cloud developer data platform
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain; MongoDB Atlas m0 free tier limited to learning and exploration only with no backup capability
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keycloak and MongoDB Atlas actually diverge.
| Attribute | Keycloak | MongoDB Atlas |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | usage-based |
| Platforms | Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API | Web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Technology |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot MongoDB Atlas
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot MongoDB Atlas
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot MongoDB Atlas
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot MongoDB Atlas
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot MongoDB Atlas
MongoDB Atlas
- Building applications with flexible JSON document storagenot Keycloak
- Performing full-text and vector search on unstructured datanot Keycloak
- Scaling multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, GCPnot Keycloak
- Streaming event data integration with Kafkanot Keycloak
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
MongoDB Atlas
- M0 free tier limited to learning and exploration only with no backup capability
- Data transfer egress charges apply at 0.12 USD/GB for dedicated clusters; inbound free
- MongoDB Search and Vector Search add significant per-hour costs starting at 0.12 USD/hour
Pricing, plan by plan
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
MongoDB Atlas
Free- M0 (Free Tier)Free
- 512 MB storage
- Shared RAM and vCPU
- No backups
- Flex Tier$0.011/hour
- 5 GB storage
- Shared RAM and vCPU
- Pay-as-you-go hourly billing
- M2 Shared$9/month
- 2 GB storage
- Shared RAM and vCPU
- M5 Shared$25/month
- 5 GB storage
- Shared RAM and vCPU
Which should you pick?
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Questions people ask
- Is Keycloak or MongoDB Atlas better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keycloak starts at Free and MongoDB Atlas at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keycloak or MongoDB Atlas?
- Keycloak starts at Free and MongoDB Atlas at Free.
- Does Keycloak or MongoDB Atlas run on more platforms?
- Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API. MongoDB Atlas runs on Web.
- Can I use Keycloak for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Keycloak best used for?
- Keycloak is most often used for organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency, companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication, open-source projects and communities requiring free iam without licensing costs, enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisation. Of those, organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency and companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication are not what MongoDB Atlas is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceMongoDB Atlas: How much does MongoDB Atlas cost?
MongoDB Atlas offers a free M0 tier with 512 MB storage, Flex tier at approximately 8-30 USD/month with pay-per-hour billing, shared clusters at 9-25 USD/month, and dedicated clusters from 56.94 USD/month. Add-on services like MongoDB Search cost 0.12-3.27 USD/hour.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceMongoDB Atlas: Is there a free tier?
Yes, MongoDB Atlas M0 free tier offers 512 MB storage with shared resources, suitable for learning and exploration. Flex tier allows pay-as-you-go usage starting at 0.011 USD/hour.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceMongoDB Atlas: What are the data transfer limits?
Inbound data transfer is typically free; egress from dedicated clusters costs 0.12 USD/GB. Free and Flex tiers do not incur data transfer charges.
SourceMongoDB Atlas: What backup options are available?
M0 free tier and Flex tier do not include backups. Dedicated clusters M10 and above include backup services with region and snapshot storage-based pricing.
SourceRelated pages
More on MongoDB Atlas
Other head to heads
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Pants Build
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Jitsu
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody
- Keycloak vs Asana
- Keycloak vs ClickUp
- Keycloak vs Figma
- Keycloak vs Linear
- Keycloak vs Confluent Cloud
- Keycloak vs CloudAMQP
- Keycloak vs Redis
- Keycloak vs Supabase
- Keycloak vs PyCharm
- Keycloak vs Alkami
- Keycloak vs Zeta
- Keycloak vs Postgres
- Keycloak vs Netlify
- Keycloak vs Productboard
- Keycloak vs Sentry
- Keycloak vs Trino
- Keycloak vs Aha!
- Keycloak vs Attio
- MongoDB Atlas vs Penpot
- MongoDB Atlas vs Soketi
- MongoDB Atlas vs Ansible
- MongoDB Atlas vs Atlantis
- MongoDB Atlas vs Vite
- MongoDB Atlas vs Depot
- MongoDB Atlas vs Pants Build
- MongoDB Atlas vs Buildkite
- MongoDB Atlas vs Coder
- MongoDB Atlas vs Jitsu
- MongoDB Atlas vs Bitbucket
- MongoDB Atlas vs Sweep
- MongoDB Atlas vs Azure DevOps
- MongoDB Atlas vs Backstage
- MongoDB Atlas vs Claude Code
- MongoDB Atlas vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- MongoDB Atlas vs Cody
- MongoDB Atlas vs Asana
- MongoDB Atlas vs ClickUp
- MongoDB Atlas vs Figma
- MongoDB Atlas vs Linear
- MongoDB Atlas vs Confluent Cloud
- MongoDB Atlas vs CloudAMQP
- MongoDB Atlas vs Redis
- MongoDB Atlas vs Supabase
- MongoDB Atlas vs PyCharm
- MongoDB Atlas vs Alkami
- MongoDB Atlas vs Zeta
- MongoDB Atlas vs Postgres
- MongoDB Atlas vs Netlify
- MongoDB Atlas vs Productboard
- MongoDB Atlas vs Sentry
- MongoDB Atlas vs Trino
- MongoDB Atlas vs Aha!
- MongoDB Atlas vs Attio
