No-Code · head to head
Appian vs Integromat

Appian
No-Code
Low-code process automation platform priced per user, per app, per month, with tier limits on data and AI volume
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Integromat has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Appian cost multiplies on three axes at once, users, apps and month, so deploying several apps to overlapping user populations produces a bill that is not obvious from any single per-user headline figure.; Integromat the free plan enforces a 15 minute minimum interval between runs, so nothing near real time is possible without paying
- They diverge on capability: Appian covers Low-code process designer, Integromat covers Visual workflow builder.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Appian and Integromat actually diverge.
| Attribute | Appian | Integromat |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | Per user, per app, per month, escalating across Standard, Advanced and Premium tiers | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Api |
| Category | No-Code | Automation Integration |
| Founded | Unknown | 2013 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Appian
- Low-code process designer
- Robotic process automation
- AI process automation
- Data fabric
- Portals
- Process mining
Only in Integromat
- Visual workflow builder
- Webhooks
- Data transformation
- Error handling
- Conditional logic
- Scheduling
- Team collaboration
- 1000+ apps
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Appian
- A regulated enterprise (financial services, government, insurance) automating case management processes that need a full audit trailnot Integromat
- A company deploying RPA bots alongside low-code apps and wanting both in one licensed platformnot Integromat
- An organisation whose process data volume is large enough that the Standard tier's 4 million row cap is a real constraint worth planning fornot Integromat
- A business wanting embedded AI actions inside workflow steps rather than bolted on separatelynot Integromat
Integromat
- workflow automationnot Appian
- integration between appsnot Appian
- task automationnot Appian
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Appian
- Cost multiplies on three axes at once, users, apps and month, so deploying several apps to overlapping user populations produces a bill that is not obvious from any single per-user headline figure.
- Each tier has hard caps on data rows, RPA bots and monthly AI actions, so a workload can force a tier upgrade purely from data or automation volume growth, independent of user count.
- No dollar figures are published anywhere on Appian's own site; every real price point comes from a sales negotiation, making early-stage budget comparison against OutSystems or Mendix difficult.
- The platform's strength in process orchestration and case management is less useful for teams that mainly want simple departmental data apps, where the pricing and capability are overkill.
- Exceeding the 200,000 (Standard) or 1,000,000 (Premium) monthly AI action allowance requires a renegotiation, so AI-heavy workflows carry real usage risk beyond the base subscription.
Integromat
- The free plan enforces a 15 minute minimum interval between runs, so nothing near real time is possible without paying
- Free is limited to 2 active scenarios, a 5 MB file size and 7 days of execution logs
- Billing is per credit where each module action counts as one, so a scenario with many steps consumes credits far faster than its run count suggests
- Make API access requires a paid plan
- Priority execution and full text log search are Pro features
- Overage protection is Enterprise only, so cheaper plans can run up charges
Pricing, plan by plan
Appian
On request- Standard$undefined/month
- Per user, per app, per month
- 4 million data row capacity
- 5 RPA bots included
- Advanced$undefined/month
- Per user, per app, per month
- Higher data row capacity than Standard
- More RPA bots than Standard
- Premium$undefined/month
- Per user, per app, per month
- 50 million data row capacity
- Unlimited RPA bots
Integromat
Free- FreeFree
- 1000 credits monthly
- basic workflow builder
- access to 3000+ apps
- Core$9/month
- 10k credits
- unlimited active scenarios
- scheduled scenarios down to the minute
- Pro$16/month
- 10k credits
- priority execution
- custom variables
- Teams$29/month
- 10k credits
- team collaboration
- team roles
Which should you pick?
Choose Appian if
- You need low-code process designer.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want robotic process automation.
Choose Integromat if
- You need visual workflow builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want webhooks.
Questions people ask
- Is Appian or Integromat better?
- Neither clearly leads. Appian starts at On request and Integromat at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Appian or Integromat?
- Integromat has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Appian and Free for Integromat.
- Does Appian or Integromat run on more platforms?
- Appian runs on Web, iOS, Android. Integromat runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Integromat for free?
- Yes. Integromat has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Appian starts at On request.
- What is Appian best used for?
- Appian is most often used for a regulated enterprise (financial services, government, insurance) automating case management processes that need a full audit trail, a company deploying rpa bots alongside low-code apps and wanting both in one licensed platform, an organisation whose process data volume is large enough that the standard tier's 4 million row cap is a real constraint worth planning for, a business wanting embedded ai actions inside workflow steps rather than bolted on separately. Of those, a regulated enterprise (financial services, government, insurance) automating case management processes that need a full audit trail and a company deploying rpa bots alongside low-code apps and wanting both in one licensed platform are not what Integromat is typically brought in for.
- What can Appian do that Integromat cannot?
- Appian covers Low-code process designer, Robotic process automation, AI process automation, Data fabric. Integromat covers Visual workflow builder, Webhooks, Data transformation, Error handling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Appian: Does Appian publish its prices?
No dollar figures are public. It discloses the pricing mechanism, per user per app per month across three tiers, but actual rates are negotiated.
Integromat: What is the free tier for Make?
Make's free tier provides 1,000 credits monthly, access to 3,000+ apps, a basic no-code workflow builder, and a 15-minute minimum interval between scenario runs.
SourceAppian: What happens if we exceed the data row cap?
Exceeding a tier's data row, RPA bot or AI action cap requires upgrading to the next tier or negotiating an add-on, regardless of user count.
Integromat: Can I save money with annual billing on Make?
Yes, Make offers 15% or more savings when paying annually instead of monthly billing.
SourceAppian: Is Appian a general app builder like OutSystems?
It can build general apps but is oriented more toward process automation and case management, with RPA and AI embedded as core features.
Integromat: How does Make's credit system work?
Each module action in Make consumes credits, with most basic actions using one credit per execution. Credits expire monthly for monthly plans or annually for yearly subscriptions.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Appian vs Mendix
- Appian vs OutSystems
- Appian vs Zoho Creator
- Appian vs Quickbase
- Appian vs Thunkable
- Appian vs Corteza
- Appian vs Pabbly Connect
- Appian vs Kintone
- Appian vs FlutterFlow
- Appian vs Caspio
- Appian vs Noloco
- Appian vs Directual
- Appian vs Superblocks
- Appian vs ToolJet
- Appian vs WeWeb
- Appian vs Whalesync
- Appian vs n8n
- Appian vs Zapier
- Appian vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Appian vs MuleSoft
- Appian vs Xano
- Appian vs Pipedream
- Appian vs Automate.io
- Appian vs Parabola
- Appian vs Nintex
- Appian vs Tray.io
- Appian vs Paragon
- Appian vs Flowise
- Appian vs HighLevel
- Appian vs Grouparoo
- Appian vs Hatchet
- Appian vs Hevo Data
- Appian vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- Appian vs Salesforce Flows
- Integromat vs Mendix
- Integromat vs OutSystems
- Integromat vs Zoho Creator
- Integromat vs Quickbase
- Integromat vs Thunkable
- Integromat vs Corteza
- Integromat vs Pabbly Connect
- Integromat vs Kintone
- Integromat vs FlutterFlow
- Integromat vs Caspio
- Integromat vs Noloco
- Integromat vs Directual
- Integromat vs Superblocks
- Integromat vs ToolJet
- Integromat vs WeWeb
- Integromat vs Whalesync
- Integromat vs n8n
- Integromat vs Zapier
- Integromat vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Integromat vs MuleSoft
- Integromat vs Xano
- Integromat vs Pipedream
- Integromat vs Automate.io
- Integromat vs Parabola
- Integromat vs Nintex
- Integromat vs Tray.io
- Integromat vs Paragon
- Integromat vs Flowise
- Integromat vs HighLevel
- Integromat vs Grouparoo
- Integromat vs Hatchet
- Integromat vs Hevo Data
- Integromat vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- Integromat vs Salesforce Flows

