Databases · head to head
Apache Pulsar vs Spring Cloud Gateway

Apache Pulsar
Databases
Cloud-native messaging and streaming with separated storage
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Spring Cloud Gateway
APIs
API gateway built on Project Reactor for building microservices
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apache Pulsar more components than Kafka: brokers, BookKeeper and ZooKeeper each need operating; Spring Cloud Gateway released under the Apache 2.0 license, free and open source with no commercial tier
- They diverge on capability: Apache Pulsar covers Separated storage, Spring Cloud Gateway covers Routing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache Pulsar and Spring Cloud Gateway actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache Pulsar | Spring Cloud Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | open-source |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted | Java, Spring Boot |
| Category | Databases | APIs |
| Founded | Unknown | 1998 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache Pulsar
- Separated storage
- Queuing and streaming
- Built-in multi-tenancy
- Geo-replication
Only in Spring Cloud Gateway
- Routing
- Path Rewriting
- Circuit Breaker
- Spring Boot
- Spring Security
- Spring Cloud
- Java support
- Spring Boot support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache Pulsar
- Platforms needing both work queues and replayable streams without running two systemsnot Spring Cloud Gateway
- Multi-tenant messaging where isolation between teams is a requirementnot Spring Cloud Gateway
- Deployments where storage and traffic grow at genuinely different ratesnot Spring Cloud Gateway
Spring Cloud Gateway
- API Developmentnot Apache Pulsar
- API Gatewaynot Apache Pulsar
- API Testingnot Apache Pulsar
- API Documentationnot Apache Pulsar
- Microservicesnot Apache Pulsar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache Pulsar
- More components than Kafka: brokers, BookKeeper and ZooKeeper each need operating
- Correspondingly harder to run well, and the expertise is rarer than Kafka expertise
- A much smaller ecosystem of connectors, tooling and hiring pool than Kafka
- The architectural advantages only pay off at a scale most deployments never reach
Spring Cloud Gateway
- Released under the Apache 2.0 license, free and open source with no commercial tier
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache Pulsar
Free- Apache PulsarFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Spring Cloud Gateway
Free- Open SourceFree
- Core Spring Cloud Gateway
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache Pulsar if
- You need separated storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want queuing and streaming.
Choose Spring Cloud Gateway if
- You need routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Java, Spring Boot.
- You also want path rewriting.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache Pulsar or Spring Cloud Gateway better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache Pulsar starts at Free and Spring Cloud Gateway at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache Pulsar or Spring Cloud Gateway?
- Apache Pulsar starts at Free and Spring Cloud Gateway at Free.
- Does Apache Pulsar or Spring Cloud Gateway run on more platforms?
- Apache Pulsar runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. Spring Cloud Gateway runs on Java, Spring Boot.
- Can I use Apache Pulsar for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apache Pulsar best used for?
- Apache Pulsar is most often used for platforms needing both work queues and replayable streams without running two systems, multi-tenant messaging where isolation between teams is a requirement, deployments where storage and traffic grow at genuinely different rates. Of those, platforms needing both work queues and replayable streams without running two systems and multi-tenant messaging where isolation between teams is a requirement are not what Spring Cloud Gateway is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache Pulsar do that Spring Cloud Gateway cannot?
- Apache Pulsar covers Separated storage, Queuing and streaming, Built-in multi-tenancy, Geo-replication. Spring Cloud Gateway covers Routing, Path Rewriting, Circuit Breaker, Spring Boot.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache Pulsar: Is Apache Pulsar free?
Yes, open source under the Apache Software Foundation.
Spring Cloud Gateway: Is Spring Cloud Gateway free?
Yes, Spring Cloud Gateway is free and open-source software. It is part of the Spring ecosystem and available through GitHub repositories with open-source dependencies like spring-cloud-starter-gateway-server-webflux and spring-cloud-starter-gateway-server-webmvc.
SourceApache Pulsar: Pulsar or Kafka?
Pulsar separates storage from compute and covers queuing and streaming in one system. Kafka has a far larger ecosystem and hiring pool. Most teams should have a specific reason before choosing Pulsar.
Spring Cloud Gateway: What enterprise support is available for Spring Cloud Gateway?
Tanzu Spring provides optional enterprise support including Day 0 access to security patches for organizations requiring guaranteed support, but specific pricing is not published on the Spring Cloud Gateway project page.
SourceApache Pulsar: Why does separated storage matter?
Brokers hold no data, so adding or replacing one requires no rebalancing, and storage can grow without adding serving capacity.
Related pages
More on Apache Pulsar
More on Spring Cloud Gateway
Other head to heads
- Apache Pulsar vs NATS
- Apache Pulsar vs RabbitMQ
- Apache Pulsar vs Solace PubSub+
- Apache Pulsar vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Apache Pulsar vs Redpanda
- Apache Pulsar vs Timeplus
- Apache Pulsar vs PostgreSQL
- Apache Pulsar vs ClickHouse
- Apache Pulsar vs DuckDB
- Apache Pulsar vs Estuary
- Apache Pulsar vs Memcached
- Apache Pulsar vs SingleStore
- Apache Pulsar vs Vitess
- Apache Pulsar vs Aiven
- Apache Pulsar vs BigQuery
- Apache Pulsar vs CosmosDB
- Apache Pulsar vs DataStax
- Apache Pulsar vs dbt
- Apache Pulsar vs Appwrite
- Apache Pulsar vs Hasura
- Apache Pulsar vs PocketBase
- Apache Pulsar vs Sanity
- Apache Pulsar vs Kong Gateway
- Apache Pulsar vs Tyk
- Apache Pulsar vs Janus Gateway
- Apache Pulsar vs Convoy
- Apache Pulsar vs WSO2 API Manager
- Apache Pulsar vs Gravitee
- Apache Pulsar vs KeystoneJS
- Apache Pulsar vs Strapi
- Apache Pulsar vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Apache Pulsar vs Thredd
- Apache Pulsar vs Thunder Client
- Apache Pulsar vs Toqio
- Apache Pulsar vs Kong
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs NATS
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs RabbitMQ
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Solace PubSub+
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Redpanda
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Timeplus
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs PostgreSQL
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs ClickHouse
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs DuckDB
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Estuary
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Memcached
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs SingleStore
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Vitess
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Aiven
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs BigQuery
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs CosmosDB
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs DataStax
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs dbt
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Appwrite
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Hasura
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs PocketBase
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Sanity
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Kong Gateway
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Tyk
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Janus Gateway
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Convoy
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Gravitee
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs KeystoneJS
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Strapi
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Thredd
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Thunder Client
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Toqio
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Kong
