Databases · head to head
Memcached vs Spring Cloud Gateway

Spring Cloud Gateway
APIs
API gateway built on Project Reactor for building microservices
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Memcached no persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume; Spring Cloud Gateway released under the Apache 2.0 license, free and open source with no commercial tier
- They diverge on capability: Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Spring Cloud Gateway covers Routing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Memcached and Spring Cloud Gateway actually diverge.
| Attribute | Memcached | Spring Cloud Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee; managed cloud billed separately | open-source |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted | Java, Spring Boot |
| Category | Databases | APIs |
| Founded | Unknown | 1998 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Memcached
- In-memory key-value cache
- Multithreaded
- Client-side sharding
- Predictable memory use
Only in Spring Cloud Gateway
- Routing
- Path Rewriting
- Circuit Breaker
- Spring Boot
- Spring Security
- Spring Cloud
- Java support
- Spring Boot support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Memcached
- Caching expensive database query results to cut loadnot Spring Cloud Gateway
- Session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptablenot Spring Cloud Gateway
- Fronting an API whose responses are costly and change slowlynot Spring Cloud Gateway
Spring Cloud Gateway
- API Developmentnot Memcached
- API Gatewaynot Memcached
- API Testingnot Memcached
- API Documentationnot Memcached
- Microservicesnot Memcached
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Memcached
- No persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- No replication or failover, so losing a node loses that share of the cache
- Only simple key-value, with none of the lists, sorted sets or streams Redis offers
- Values are capped at 1MB by default, which surprises teams caching large documents
Spring Cloud Gateway
- Released under the Apache 2.0 license, free and open source with no commercial tier
Pricing, plan by plan
Memcached
Free- MemcachedFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
Spring Cloud Gateway
Free- Open SourceFree
- Core Spring Cloud Gateway
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Memcached if
- You need in-memory key-value cache.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want multithreaded.
Choose Spring Cloud Gateway if
- You need routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Java, Spring Boot.
- You also want path rewriting.
Questions people ask
- Is Memcached or Spring Cloud Gateway better?
- Neither clearly leads. Memcached starts at Free and Spring Cloud Gateway at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Memcached or Spring Cloud Gateway?
- Memcached starts at Free and Spring Cloud Gateway at Free.
- Does Memcached or Spring Cloud Gateway run on more platforms?
- Memcached runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted. Spring Cloud Gateway runs on Java, Spring Boot.
- Can I use Memcached for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Memcached best used for?
- Memcached is most often used for caching expensive database query results to cut load, session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable, fronting an api whose responses are costly and change slowly. Of those, caching expensive database query results to cut load and session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable are not what Spring Cloud Gateway is typically brought in for.
- What can Memcached do that Spring Cloud Gateway cannot?
- Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Multithreaded, Client-side sharding, Predictable memory use. Spring Cloud Gateway covers Routing, Path Rewriting, Circuit Breaker, Spring Boot.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Memcached: Is Memcached free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Spring Cloud Gateway: Is Spring Cloud Gateway free?
Yes, Spring Cloud Gateway is free and open-source software. It is part of the Spring ecosystem and available through GitHub repositories with open-source dependencies like spring-cloud-starter-gateway-server-webflux and spring-cloud-starter-gateway-server-webmvc.
SourceMemcached: Memcached or Redis?
Memcached is a pure cache: simpler, multithreaded and very predictable. Redis adds persistence, replication and rich data structures, which is why it is the default choice unless you specifically want a cache and nothing more.
Spring Cloud Gateway: What enterprise support is available for Spring Cloud Gateway?
Tanzu Spring provides optional enterprise support including Day 0 access to security patches for organizations requiring guaranteed support, but specific pricing is not published on the Spring Cloud Gateway project page.
SourceMemcached: Does Memcached persist data?
No. Everything is in memory and lost on restart, by design.
Related pages
More on Spring Cloud Gateway
Other head to heads
- Memcached vs Dragonfly
- Memcached vs Valkey
- Memcached vs Readyset
- Memcached vs PostgreSQL
- Memcached vs DuckDB
- Memcached vs DynamoDB
- Memcached vs NATS
- Memcached vs Apache Pulsar
- Memcached vs Presto
- Memcached vs Timeplus
- Memcached vs RabbitMQ
- Memcached vs EMQX
- Memcached vs FaunaDB
- Memcached vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Memcached vs MotherDuck
- Memcached vs Neo4j
- Memcached vs Apache Kafka
- Memcached vs Firestore
- Memcached vs Appwrite
- Memcached vs Hasura
- Memcached vs PocketBase
- Memcached vs Sanity
- Memcached vs Kong Gateway
- Memcached vs Tyk
- Memcached vs Janus Gateway
- Memcached vs Convoy
- Memcached vs WSO2 API Manager
- Memcached vs Gravitee
- Memcached vs KeystoneJS
- Memcached vs Strapi
- Memcached vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Memcached vs Thredd
- Memcached vs Thunder Client
- Memcached vs Toqio
- Memcached vs Kong
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Dragonfly
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Valkey
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Readyset
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs PostgreSQL
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs DuckDB
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs DynamoDB
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs NATS
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Apache Pulsar
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Presto
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Timeplus
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs RabbitMQ
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs EMQX
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs FaunaDB
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs MotherDuck
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Neo4j
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Apache Kafka
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Firestore
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Appwrite
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Hasura
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs PocketBase
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Sanity
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Kong Gateway
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Tyk
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Janus Gateway
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Convoy
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Gravitee
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs KeystoneJS
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Strapi
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Thredd
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Thunder Client
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Toqio
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Kong
