Databases · head to head
Apache Pulsar vs Strapi

Apache Pulsar
Databases
Cloud-native messaging and streaming with separated storage
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Apache Pulsar has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Apache Pulsar more components than Kafka: brokers, BookKeeper and ZooKeeper each need operating; Strapi cloud pricing is per project, not per account, so a second project doubles the bill
- They diverge on capability: Apache Pulsar covers Separated storage, Strapi covers REST API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache Pulsar and Strapi actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache Pulsar | Strapi |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $35/month |
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted | Node.js, Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker |
| Category | Databases | APIs |
| Founded | Unknown | 2015 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache Pulsar
- Separated storage
- Queuing and streaming
- Built-in multi-tenancy
- Geo-replication
Only in Strapi
- REST API
- GraphQL API
- Content management
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- MongoDB
- AWS
- Webhooks
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache Pulsar
- Platforms needing both work queues and replayable streams without running two systemsnot Strapi
- Multi-tenant messaging where isolation between teams is a requirementnot Strapi
- Deployments where storage and traffic grow at genuinely different ratesnot Strapi
Strapi
- Running a self hosted headless CMS with a REST or GraphQL APInot Apache Pulsar
- Giving editors a content admin panel over a custom content modelnot Apache Pulsar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache Pulsar
- More components than Kafka: brokers, BookKeeper and ZooKeeper each need operating
- Correspondingly harder to run well, and the expertise is rarer than Kafka expertise
- A much smaller ecosystem of connectors, tooling and hiring pool than Kafka
- The architectural advantages only pay off at a scale most deployments never reach
Strapi
- Cloud pricing is per project, not per account, so a second project doubles the bill
- Starter at $35 a month allows 100,000 API requests, and overage is $1.50 per 25,000
- Extra bandwidth is $30 per 100 GB and extra asset storage $0.60 per GB
- Backups start at the Pro plan, weekly, and only become daily at Business
- An uptime SLA is Business only, at $450 a month per project
- Additional environments cost $60 a month on Pro and $300 a month on Business
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache Pulsar
Free- Apache PulsarFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Strapi
$35/month- Starter$35/month
- 100k API requests
- 50 GB asset storage
- 50 GB asset bandwidth
- Pro$90/month
- 1M API requests
- 250 GB asset storage
- 500 GB asset bandwidth
- Business$450/month
- 10M API requests
- 1000 GB asset storage
- 1000 GB asset bandwidth
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache Pulsar if
- You need separated storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want queuing and streaming.
Choose Strapi if
- You need rest api.
- You work on Node.js, Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker.
- You also want graphql api.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache Pulsar or Strapi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache Pulsar starts at Free and Strapi at $35/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache Pulsar or Strapi?
- Apache Pulsar has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Apache Pulsar and $35/month for Strapi.
- Does Apache Pulsar or Strapi run on more platforms?
- Apache Pulsar runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. Strapi runs on Node.js, Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker.
- Can I use Apache Pulsar for free?
- Yes. Apache Pulsar has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Strapi starts at $35/month.
- What is Apache Pulsar best used for?
- Apache Pulsar is most often used for platforms needing both work queues and replayable streams without running two systems, multi-tenant messaging where isolation between teams is a requirement, deployments where storage and traffic grow at genuinely different rates. Of those, platforms needing both work queues and replayable streams without running two systems and multi-tenant messaging where isolation between teams is a requirement are not what Strapi is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache Pulsar do that Strapi cannot?
- Apache Pulsar covers Separated storage, Queuing and streaming, Built-in multi-tenancy, Geo-replication. Strapi covers REST API, GraphQL API, Content management, PostgreSQL.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache Pulsar: Is Apache Pulsar free?
Yes, open source under the Apache Software Foundation.
Strapi: How much do API request overages cost?
Additional API requests beyond the plan limit cost $1.50 per 25000 requests. Extra asset storage costs $0.60 per GB, and additional bandwidth costs $30 per 100 GB.
SourceApache Pulsar: Pulsar or Kafka?
Pulsar separates storage from compute and covers queuing and streaming in one system. Kafka has a far larger ecosystem and hiring pool. Most teams should have a specific reason before choosing Pulsar.
Strapi: Is yearly billing available?
Yes, yearly billing saves up to 17% compared to monthly billing on Strapi Cloud plans.
SourceApache Pulsar: Why does separated storage matter?
Brokers hold no data, so adding or replacing one requires no rebalancing, and storage can grow without adding serving capacity.
Strapi: What is included with the Pro plan?
The Pro plan costs $90 per month per project and includes 1M API requests, 250 GB asset storage, 500 GB bandwidth, multi-environment support, weekly backups, and manual backups.
SourceRelated pages
More on Apache Pulsar
Other head to heads
- Apache Pulsar vs NATS
- Apache Pulsar vs RabbitMQ
- Apache Pulsar vs Solace PubSub+
- Apache Pulsar vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Apache Pulsar vs Redpanda
- Apache Pulsar vs Timeplus
- Apache Pulsar vs PostgreSQL
- Apache Pulsar vs ClickHouse
- Apache Pulsar vs DuckDB
- Apache Pulsar vs Estuary
- Apache Pulsar vs Memcached
- Apache Pulsar vs SingleStore
- Apache Pulsar vs Vitess
- Apache Pulsar vs Aiven
- Apache Pulsar vs BigQuery
- Apache Pulsar vs CosmosDB
- Apache Pulsar vs DataStax
- Apache Pulsar vs dbt
- Apache Pulsar vs PocketBase
- Apache Pulsar vs Appwrite
- Apache Pulsar vs Hasura
- Apache Pulsar vs Sanity
- Apache Pulsar vs Directus
- Apache Pulsar vs KeystoneJS
- Apache Pulsar vs Payload CMS
- Apache Pulsar vs Parse Server
- Apache Pulsar vs GraphQL Apollo
- Apache Pulsar vs Gravitee
- Apache Pulsar vs Kong Gateway
- Apache Pulsar vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Apache Pulsar vs Swagger
- Apache Pulsar vs TIBCO Mashery
- Apache Pulsar vs Zeplo
- Apache Pulsar vs Pusher
- Apache Pulsar vs Salt Edge
- Apache Pulsar vs Kong
- Strapi vs NATS
- Strapi vs RabbitMQ
- Strapi vs Solace PubSub+
- Strapi vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Strapi vs Redpanda
- Strapi vs Timeplus
- Strapi vs PostgreSQL
- Strapi vs ClickHouse
- Strapi vs DuckDB
- Strapi vs Estuary
- Strapi vs Memcached
- Strapi vs SingleStore
- Strapi vs Vitess
- Strapi vs Aiven
- Strapi vs BigQuery
- Strapi vs CosmosDB
- Strapi vs DataStax
- Strapi vs dbt
- Strapi vs PocketBase
- Strapi vs Appwrite
- Strapi vs Hasura
- Strapi vs Sanity
- Strapi vs Directus
- Strapi vs KeystoneJS
- Strapi vs Payload CMS
- Strapi vs Parse Server
- Strapi vs GraphQL Apollo
- Strapi vs Gravitee
- Strapi vs Kong Gateway
- Strapi vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Strapi vs Swagger
- Strapi vs TIBCO Mashery
- Strapi vs Zeplo
- Strapi vs Pusher
- Strapi vs Salt Edge
- Strapi vs Kong

