Databases · head to head
Aiven vs Apache Pulsar

Apache Pulsar
Databases
Cloud-native messaging and streaming with separated storage
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Aiven the free plan gives 1 VM with 1 CPU, 1 GB RAM and 1 GB storage, and cannot pick a specific cloud or region; Apache Pulsar more components than Kafka: brokers, BookKeeper and ZooKeeper each need operating
- They diverge on capability: Aiven covers Multi-cloud Support, Apache Pulsar covers Separated storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aiven and Apache Pulsar actually diverge.
| Attribute | Aiven | Apache Pulsar |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp, Do | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted |
| Founded | 2016 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aiven
- Multi-cloud Support
- Automated Backups
- Seamless Upgrades
- VPC Peering
- End-to-end Encryption
- Compliance
- Observability
- PostgreSQL
Only in Apache Pulsar
- Separated storage
- Queuing and streaming
- Built-in multi-tenancy
- Geo-replication
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aiven
- Running managed open source databases without operating themnot Apache Pulsar
- Multi-cloud deployment across AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, DigitalOcean, OVH and UpCloudnot Apache Pulsar
- Highly available data services with automatic failovernot Apache Pulsar
- Prototyping on a small free instance before scaling upnot Apache Pulsar
Apache Pulsar
- Platforms needing both work queues and replayable streams without running two systemsnot Aiven
- Multi-tenant messaging where isolation between teams is a requirementnot Aiven
- Deployments where storage and traffic grow at genuinely different ratesnot Aiven
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aiven
- The free plan gives 1 VM with 1 CPU, 1 GB RAM and 1 GB storage, and cannot pick a specific cloud or region
- Free and Developer tiers have no integrations and no connection pooling
- Connection pooling, database forks and dynamic disk sizing need the Business or Premium plan
- A 99.99 percent uptime SLA starts at the Startup plan from $75 a month
- High availability with automatic failover starts at Business from $180 a month
Apache Pulsar
- More components than Kafka: brokers, BookKeeper and ZooKeeper each need operating
- Correspondingly harder to run well, and the expertise is rarer than Kafka expertise
- A much smaller ecosystem of connectors, tooling and hiring pool than Kafka
- The architectural advantages only pay off at a scale most deployments never reach
Pricing, plan by plan
Aiven
Free- Free TrialFree
- $300 credits
- 30 day trial
- All services
- Startup$19/month
- Single node
- Basic support
- Daily backups
Apache Pulsar
Free- Apache PulsarFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Aiven if
- You need multi-cloud support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp, Do.
- You also want automated backups.
Choose Apache Pulsar if
- You need separated storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want queuing and streaming.
Questions people ask
- Is Aiven or Apache Pulsar better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aiven starts at Free and Apache Pulsar at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aiven or Apache Pulsar?
- Aiven starts at Free and Apache Pulsar at Free.
- Does Aiven or Apache Pulsar run on more platforms?
- Aiven runs on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp, Do. Apache Pulsar runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Aiven for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Aiven best used for?
- Aiven is most often used for running managed open source databases without operating them, multi-cloud deployment across aws, google cloud, azure, digitalocean, ovh and upcloud, highly available data services with automatic failover, prototyping on a small free instance before scaling up. Of those, running managed open source databases without operating them and multi-cloud deployment across aws, google cloud, azure, digitalocean, ovh and upcloud are not what Apache Pulsar is typically brought in for.
- What can Aiven do that Apache Pulsar cannot?
- Aiven covers Multi-cloud Support, Automated Backups, Seamless Upgrades, VPC Peering. Apache Pulsar covers Separated storage, Queuing and streaming, Built-in multi-tenancy, Geo-replication.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aiven: What does Aiven's free tier include and does it have any time limit?
The free tier includes PostgreSQL with 1 VM, 1 CPU, 1 GB RAM, and 1 GB storage with access to limited cloud and region selections. There are no time limitations on the free tier, though Aiven reserves the right to shut down accounts that violate policies or remain unused for extended periods.
SourceApache Pulsar: Is Apache Pulsar free?
Yes, open source under the Apache Software Foundation.
Aiven: How is Aiven billed and what are the monthly costs for each tier?
Aiven bills services by the hour and invoices monthly, charging only for what you actually run. PostgreSQL pricing starts at 5 dollars per month for Developer, 12 dollars per month for Hobbyist, 75 dollars per month for Startup, 180 dollars per month for Business, and 270 dollars per month for Premium. All paid tiers offer hourly billing options as well.
SourceApache Pulsar: Pulsar or Kafka?
Pulsar separates storage from compute and covers queuing and streaming in one system. Kafka has a far larger ecosystem and hiring pool. Most teams should have a specific reason before choosing Pulsar.
Aiven: What backup retention periods are included at different Aiven tiers?
Backup retention increases with tier level: Startup tier provides 2 days of backup retention, Business tier offers 14 days, and Premium tier includes 30 days. Point-in-time restore is available on all paid tiers.
SourceApache Pulsar: Why does separated storage matter?
Brokers hold no data, so adding or replacing one requires no rebalancing, and storage can grow without adding serving capacity.
Aiven: Is high availability included in Aiven pricing or charged separately?
High availability, backups, and routine maintenance are all included in the tier costs with no separate charges. The Business tier includes 2 VMs with automatic failover, and Premium includes 3 VMs with a second standby node.
SourceAiven: Does Aiven offer a trial period to test premium features?
Aiven offers a 30-day free trial to access premium features beyond what the free plan provides.
SourceRelated pages
More on Apache Pulsar
Other head to heads
- Aiven vs PostgreSQL
- Aiven vs Instaclustr
- Aiven vs Amazon Aurora
- Aiven vs Cockroach Labs
- Aiven vs Airtable
- Aiven vs Google Cloud SQL
- Aiven vs Apache Kafka
- Aiven vs RabbitMQ
- Aiven vs Azure SQL
- Aiven vs MariaDB
- Aiven vs LanceDB
- Aiven vs Marqo
- Aiven vs Nile
- Aiven vs Ninox
- Aiven vs Presto
- Aiven vs Privacera
- Aiven vs Amazon RDS
- Aiven vs Apache Flink
- Aiven vs NATS
- Aiven vs Solace PubSub+
- Aiven vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Aiven vs Redpanda
- Aiven vs Timeplus
- Aiven vs ClickHouse
- Aiven vs DuckDB
- Aiven vs Estuary
- Aiven vs Memcached
- Aiven vs SingleStore
- Aiven vs Vitess
- Aiven vs BigQuery
- Aiven vs CosmosDB
- Aiven vs DataStax
- Aiven vs dbt
- Apache Pulsar vs PostgreSQL
- Apache Pulsar vs Instaclustr
- Apache Pulsar vs Amazon Aurora
- Apache Pulsar vs Cockroach Labs
- Apache Pulsar vs Airtable
- Apache Pulsar vs Google Cloud SQL
- Apache Pulsar vs Apache Kafka
- Apache Pulsar vs RabbitMQ
- Apache Pulsar vs Azure SQL
- Apache Pulsar vs MariaDB
- Apache Pulsar vs LanceDB
- Apache Pulsar vs Marqo
- Apache Pulsar vs Nile
- Apache Pulsar vs Ninox
- Apache Pulsar vs Presto
- Apache Pulsar vs Privacera
- Apache Pulsar vs Amazon RDS
- Apache Pulsar vs Apache Flink
- Apache Pulsar vs NATS
- Apache Pulsar vs Solace PubSub+
- Apache Pulsar vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Apache Pulsar vs Redpanda
- Apache Pulsar vs Timeplus
- Apache Pulsar vs ClickHouse
- Apache Pulsar vs DuckDB
- Apache Pulsar vs Estuary
- Apache Pulsar vs Memcached
- Apache Pulsar vs SingleStore
- Apache Pulsar vs Vitess
- Apache Pulsar vs BigQuery
- Apache Pulsar vs CosmosDB
- Apache Pulsar vs DataStax
- Apache Pulsar vs dbt

