Databases · head to head
Neo4j vs turbopuffer

turbopuffer
Databases
Closed-source vector and full-text search service built directly on object storage, with cold queries measured in seconds rather than milliseconds.
- From
- $16/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Neo4j has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Neo4j auraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery; turbopuffer a cold namespace pays object storage latency on the first query, with a documented p90 around 1,214 ms on a million documents, so any interactive search box needs the data kept warm or the user waits about a second.
- They diverge on capability: Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, turbopuffer covers Object storage architecture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Neo4j and turbopuffer actually diverge.
| Attribute | Neo4j | turbopuffer |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $16/month |
| Pricing model | freemium | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web | Web |
| Founded | 2007 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Neo4j
- Native Graph Storage
- Cypher Query Language
- ACID Transactions
- High Availability
- Graph Data Science
- Full-text Search
- Native Indexes
- GraphQL
Only in turbopuffer
- Object storage architecture
- Namespaces
- Vector search
- Full-text search
- Attribute filtering
- Documented limits
- Configurable consistency
- Durable writes
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Neo4j
- Graph database for learning and explorationnot turbopuffer
- Production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancynot turbopuffer
- Enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructurenot turbopuffer
turbopuffer
- A product with one search index per customer and thousands of customers, most of whose data is idle on any given daynot Neo4j
- Very large corpora where holding every vector in memory is the dominant cost and occasional cold-query latency is acceptablenot Neo4j
- Hybrid retrieval combining BM25 and vector search where running and synchronising two separate systems is the problem being solvednot Neo4j
- Retrieval for agent and assistant products where indexes are created and destroyed frequently and per-index overhead must be near zeronot Neo4j
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Neo4j
- AuraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- AuraDB Free imposes limits on node and relationship counts and runs single-zone only
- SSO authentication and role-based access control are excluded from AuraDB Free and AuraDB Professional, starting only at Business Critical at $146 per GB per month with a 2GB minimum cluster
- AuraDB Professional starts at $65 per GB per month with a minimum 1GB cluster and caps at 128GB memory per instance
- AuraDB Professional backups are daily with only 7-day retention, against 30 days on Business Critical
- Customer managed keys and private endpoints are available only on AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud, which is quote only with no published price
- Change data capture, query log forwarding, secondaries and access to Neo4j Professional Services are excluded below the Business Critical tier
- Support on AuraDB Free is community only and AuraDB Professional is best effort, with 24x7 one-hour response starting at Business Critical
- AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud is sold on prepaid contract terms with enterprise commercial negotiation rather than self-serve card payment
turbopuffer
- A cold namespace pays object storage latency on the first query, with a documented p90 around 1,214 ms on a million documents, so any interactive search box needs the data kept warm or the user waits about a second.
- Queries are eventually consistent by default, and after roughly 128 MiB of outstanding writes new data is invisible until indexed, which the vendor puts at tens of seconds for small namespaces and tens of minutes for large ones, so a bulk re-index is not immediately queryable.
- It is closed source with no community edition, so single-tenant or bring-your-own-cloud deployment is a commercial negotiation rather than a deployment choice, and there is no path to running it yourself if the relationship ends.
- Per-namespace ceilings, roughly 10,000 writes per second, 32 MB/s and 500 million documents per shard, mean a single enormous index has to be sharded across namespaces by your application rather than by the service.
- It is a search engine, not a database: there are no joins, no cross-document transactions and no SQL, so it sits beside a primary datastore and keeping the two in step is work that belongs to you.
Pricing, plan by plan
Neo4j
Free- FreeFree
- Learning and exploration access
- No credit card required
- All graph tools included
- AuraDB Professional$65/GB/month
- 1GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.09/hour for 1GB)
- Daily backups with 7-day retention
- AuraDB Business Critical$146/GB/month
- 2GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.40/hour for 2GB)
- Up to 512GB maximum
- Virtual Dedicated Cloud$null/custom
- Custom pricing via sales contact
- Dedicated VPC infrastructure
- Hourly backups with 60-day retention
turbopuffer
$16/month- Launch$16/month
- All database features
- Multi-tenancy deployment
- SOC2 & GDPR-ready DPA
- Scale$256/month
- Everything in Launch
- HIPAA-ready BAA
- Single Sign-On (SSO)
- Enterprise$4096/month
- Everything in Scale
- Single-tenancy & BYOC deployment options
- Private networking
Which should you pick?
Choose Neo4j if
- You need native graph storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want cypher query language.
Choose turbopuffer if
- You need object storage architecture.
- You also want namespaces.
Questions people ask
- Is Neo4j or turbopuffer better?
- Neither clearly leads. Neo4j starts at Free and turbopuffer at $16/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Neo4j or turbopuffer?
- Neo4j has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Neo4j and $16/month for turbopuffer.
- Does Neo4j or turbopuffer run on more platforms?
- Neo4j runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web. turbopuffer runs on Web.
- Can I use Neo4j for free?
- Yes. Neo4j has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. turbopuffer starts at $16/month.
- What is Neo4j best used for?
- Neo4j is most often used for graph database for learning and exploration, production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancy, enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructure. Of those, graph database for learning and exploration and production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancy are not what turbopuffer is typically brought in for.
- What can Neo4j do that turbopuffer cannot?
- Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, Cypher Query Language, ACID Transactions, High Availability. turbopuffer covers Object storage architecture, Namespaces, Vector search, Full-text search.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Neo4j: Is Neo4j free?
Neo4j offers a free tier (AuraDB Free) for learning and exploration with no credit card required. Community Edition is also free and GPL3-licensed. Paid tiers start at $65/GB per month for AuraDB Professional.
Sourceturbopuffer: Can I self-host turbopuffer?
There is no open source or community edition. Single-tenant and bring-your-own-cloud deployments exist as commercial arrangements, but there is no way to run it independently of the vendor.
Neo4j: What does Neo4j's Professional tier include?
AuraDB Professional costs $65/GB per month with a 1GB minimum cluster, includes daily backups with 7-day retention, single-zone availability, and best-effort support. Hourly billing is available at $0.09/hour per GB.
Sourceturbopuffer: How fast is it really?
Warm queries perform comparably to in-memory search engines. Cold queries, where data is not cached, have a documented p90 around 1,214 ms on a million documents. Write p90 is around 248 ms for a 512 KB upsert because writes go straight to object storage.
Neo4j: What is Neo4j's most advanced pricing tier?
AuraDB Business Critical costs $146/GB per month with a 2GB minimum and includes multi-zone redundancy, 99.95% uptime SLA, 24/7 premium support with one-hour response times, and point-in-time recovery.
Sourceturbopuffer: Is it consistent?
Eventually consistent by default, with the vendor reporting that over 99.8% of queries return consistent data. Strong consistency can be requested per query at a latency cost. Large write bursts have a longer visibility delay while indexing catches up.
turbopuffer: What is it best at?
Large numbers of namespaces where most are idle. The architecture makes cold data cheap to keep, which is exactly the shape of a multi-tenant product with a long tail of inactive customers.
turbopuffer: What are the hard limits?
Up to 128 billion documents and 256 TB per namespace, 500 million documents per shard, 64 MiB per document, 10,752 dense vector dimensions, roughly 10,000 writes per second per namespace and a maximum result set of 10,000.
Related pages
More on turbopuffer
Other head to heads
- Neo4j vs Elasticsearch
- Neo4j vs Cockroach Labs
- Neo4j vs PostgreSQL
- Neo4j vs Airtable
- Neo4j vs Amazon Aurora
- Neo4j vs ArangoDB
- Neo4j vs Dgraph
- Neo4j vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Neo4j vs Couchbase
- Neo4j vs Cassandra
- Neo4j vs Valkey
- Neo4j vs Canary Labs
- Neo4j vs Chroma
- Neo4j vs DynamoDB
- Neo4j vs CouchDB
- Neo4j vs Apache Doris
- Neo4j vs Apache Solr
- Neo4j vs BigQuery
- Neo4j vs Dremio
- Neo4j vs DuckDB
- Neo4j vs Typesense
- Neo4j vs Dragonfly
- Neo4j vs LanceDB
- Neo4j vs Readyset
- turbopuffer vs Elasticsearch
- turbopuffer vs Cockroach Labs
- turbopuffer vs PostgreSQL
- turbopuffer vs Airtable
- turbopuffer vs Amazon Aurora
- turbopuffer vs ArangoDB
- turbopuffer vs Dgraph
- turbopuffer vs Firebase Realtime Database
- turbopuffer vs Couchbase
- turbopuffer vs Cassandra
- turbopuffer vs Valkey
- turbopuffer vs Canary Labs
- turbopuffer vs Chroma
- turbopuffer vs DynamoDB
- turbopuffer vs CouchDB
- turbopuffer vs Apache Doris
- turbopuffer vs Apache Solr
- turbopuffer vs BigQuery
- turbopuffer vs Dremio
- turbopuffer vs DuckDB
- turbopuffer vs Typesense
- turbopuffer vs Dragonfly
- turbopuffer vs LanceDB
- turbopuffer vs Readyset

