Databases · head to head
Neo4j vs Timeplus

Timeplus
Databases
Streaming SQL engine built on ClickHouse internals, shipping as one small binary
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Neo4j auraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery; Timeplus proton, the free version, is single-node by design, so any requirement for high availability or horizontal scale forces the commercial licence; the open source edition is a trial in practical terms.
- They diverge on capability: Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, Timeplus covers Streaming SQL.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Neo4j and Timeplus actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Neo4j
- Native Graph Storage
- Cypher Query Language
- ACID Transactions
- High Availability
- Graph Data Science
- Full-text Search
- Native Indexes
- GraphQL
Only in Timeplus
- Streaming SQL
- Unified streaming and historical
- ClickHouse-based engine
- Single binary deployment
- External streams
- Materialised views
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Neo4j
- Graph database for learning and explorationnot Timeplus
- Production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancynot Timeplus
- Enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructurenot Timeplus
Timeplus
- Real-time alerting on Kafka topics where standing up a Flink cluster is more work than the use case justifiesnot Neo4j
- Fraud or anomaly detection that must join a live event stream against recent history in one querynot Neo4j
- Streaming ETL from Kafka or MySQL change data capture into ClickHouse without writing Javanot Neo4j
- A small data team that needs continuous aggregation but has no platform engineers to operate JVM infrastructurenot Neo4j
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Neo4j
- AuraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- AuraDB Free imposes limits on node and relationship counts and runs single-zone only
- SSO authentication and role-based access control are excluded from AuraDB Free and AuraDB Professional, starting only at Business Critical at $146 per GB per month with a 2GB minimum cluster
- AuraDB Professional starts at $65 per GB per month with a minimum 1GB cluster and caps at 128GB memory per instance
- AuraDB Professional backups are daily with only 7-day retention, against 30 days on Business Critical
- Customer managed keys and private endpoints are available only on AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud, which is quote only with no published price
- Change data capture, query log forwarding, secondaries and access to Neo4j Professional Services are excluded below the Business Critical tier
- Support on AuraDB Free is community only and AuraDB Professional is best effort, with 24x7 one-hour response starting at Business Critical
- AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud is sold on prepaid contract terms with enterprise commercial negotiation rather than self-serve card payment
Timeplus
- Proton, the free version, is single-node by design, so any requirement for high availability or horizontal scale forces the commercial licence; the open source edition is a trial in practical terms.
- It is a young project against Apache Flink’s decade of production history, so the hiring pool, the connector library and the body of known failure modes are all much smaller.
- Inheriting ClickHouse internals also inherits ClickHouse constraints: memory-hungry queries, awkward updates and a SQL dialect that is not portable to other engines.
- Exactly-once semantics and state recovery guarantees are less battle-tested than Flink checkpointing, which matters if the pipeline moves money.
- Cloud pricing is by provisioned instance size rather than usage, so a bursty workload pays for peak capacity around the clock or has to be resized by hand.
Pricing, plan by plan
Neo4j
Free- FreeFree
- Learning and exploration access
- No credit card required
- All graph tools included
- AuraDB Professional$65/GB/month
- 1GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.09/hour for 1GB)
- Daily backups with 7-day retention
- AuraDB Business Critical$146/GB/month
- 2GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.40/hour for 2GB)
- Up to 512GB maximum
- Virtual Dedicated Cloud$null/custom
- Custom pricing via sales contact
- Dedicated VPC infrastructure
- Hourly backups with 60-day retention
Timeplus
Free- Timeplus ProtonFree
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Single node only
- Full streaming SQL engine
- Timeplus Cloud$199/month
- One to thirty-two CPUs
- 4 GB to 128 GB memory
- From 250 GB SSD storage
- Self-hosted or BYOC$undefined/year
- Multi-node clustering
- Kubernetes or bare metal
- Customisable compute and storage
Which should you pick?
Choose Neo4j if
- You need native graph storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want cypher query language.
Choose Timeplus if
- You need streaming sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want unified streaming and historical.
Questions people ask
- Is Neo4j or Timeplus better?
- Neither clearly leads. Neo4j starts at Free and Timeplus at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Neo4j or Timeplus?
- Neo4j starts at Free and Timeplus at Free.
- Does Neo4j or Timeplus run on more platforms?
- Neo4j runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web. Timeplus runs on Linux, macOS, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- Can I use Neo4j for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Neo4j best used for?
- Neo4j is most often used for graph database for learning and exploration, production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancy, enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructure. Of those, graph database for learning and exploration and production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancy are not what Timeplus is typically brought in for.
- What can Neo4j do that Timeplus cannot?
- Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, Cypher Query Language, ACID Transactions, High Availability. Timeplus covers Streaming SQL, Unified streaming and historical, ClickHouse-based engine, Single binary deployment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Neo4j: Is Neo4j free?
Neo4j offers a free tier (AuraDB Free) for learning and exploration with no credit card required. Community Edition is also free and GPL3-licensed. Paid tiers start at $65/GB per month for AuraDB Professional.
SourceTimeplus: Is Timeplus open source?
The core engine, Timeplus Proton, is Apache 2.0. Timeplus Enterprise and Cloud are commercial.
Neo4j: What does Neo4j's Professional tier include?
AuraDB Professional costs $65/GB per month with a 1GB minimum cluster, includes daily backups with 7-day retention, single-zone availability, and best-effort support. Hourly billing is available at $0.09/hour per GB.
SourceTimeplus: What is the difference from Flink?
Timeplus is one binary with SQL as the only interface; Flink is a JVM cluster with a Java and SQL API and far more operational surface.
Neo4j: What is Neo4j's most advanced pricing tier?
AuraDB Business Critical costs $146/GB per month with a 2GB minimum and includes multi-zone redundancy, 99.95% uptime SLA, 24/7 premium support with one-hour response times, and point-in-time recovery.
SourceTimeplus: Can Proton run in production?
It can, but it is single-node only, so there is no high availability without the commercial edition.
Timeplus: How much is the cloud?
From 199 US dollars a month, sized by CPU and memory, with a fourteen day trial.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Neo4j vs Elasticsearch
- Neo4j vs Cockroach Labs
- Neo4j vs PostgreSQL
- Neo4j vs Airtable
- Neo4j vs Amazon Aurora
- Neo4j vs ArangoDB
- Neo4j vs Dgraph
- Neo4j vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Neo4j vs Couchbase
- Neo4j vs Cassandra
- Neo4j vs Valkey
- Neo4j vs Canary Labs
- Neo4j vs Chroma
- Neo4j vs DynamoDB
- Neo4j vs CouchDB
- Neo4j vs Apache Doris
- Neo4j vs Apache Solr
- Neo4j vs Apache Flink
- Neo4j vs ClickHouse
- Neo4j vs Materialize
- Neo4j vs Redpanda
- Neo4j vs NATS
- Neo4j vs DuckDB
- Neo4j vs Estuary
- Neo4j vs RisingWave
- Neo4j vs Meilisearch
- Neo4j vs OpenSearch
- Neo4j vs Qdrant
- Neo4j vs SingleStore
- Neo4j vs TiDB
- Neo4j vs Tinybird
- Neo4j vs Apache Kafka
- Neo4j vs Apache Pulsar
- Neo4j vs Apache Druid
- Timeplus vs Elasticsearch
- Timeplus vs Cockroach Labs
- Timeplus vs PostgreSQL
- Timeplus vs Airtable
- Timeplus vs Amazon Aurora
- Timeplus vs ArangoDB
- Timeplus vs Dgraph
- Timeplus vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Timeplus vs Couchbase
- Timeplus vs Cassandra
- Timeplus vs Valkey
- Timeplus vs Canary Labs
- Timeplus vs Chroma
- Timeplus vs DynamoDB
- Timeplus vs CouchDB
- Timeplus vs Apache Doris
- Timeplus vs Apache Solr
- Timeplus vs Apache Flink
- Timeplus vs ClickHouse
- Timeplus vs Materialize
- Timeplus vs Redpanda
- Timeplus vs NATS
- Timeplus vs DuckDB
- Timeplus vs Estuary
- Timeplus vs RisingWave
- Timeplus vs Meilisearch
- Timeplus vs OpenSearch
- Timeplus vs Qdrant
- Timeplus vs SingleStore
- Timeplus vs TiDB
- Timeplus vs Tinybird
- Timeplus vs Apache Kafka
- Timeplus vs Apache Pulsar
- Timeplus vs Apache Druid

