Databases · head to head
Memcached vs SurrealDB

SurrealDB
Databases
Multi-model database combining documents, graphs, vectors and time-series
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Memcached no persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume; SurrealDB the listed $0.192/node/hr Scale pricing lacks transparent higher-tier rates, requiring a sales conversation for full production sizing.
- They diverge on capability: Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, SurrealDB covers Multi-model engine.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Memcached and SurrealDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Memcached
- In-memory key-value cache
- Multithreaded
- Client-side sharding
- Predictable memory use
Only in SurrealDB
- Multi-model engine
- ACID transactions
- Hybrid retrieval
- Horizontal scaling
- Multi-region disaster recovery
- FIPS-compliant cryptography
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Memcached
- Caching expensive database query results to cut loadnot SurrealDB
- Session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptablenot SurrealDB
- Fronting an API whose responses are costly and change slowlynot SurrealDB
SurrealDB
- AI agent memory and retrieval-augmented generationnot Memcached
- Applications needing documents, graphs and vectors in one databasenot Memcached
- Knowledge graph construction from unstructured datanot Memcached
- Regulated workloads requiring SOC2/ISO27001/HIPAA-eligible hostingnot Memcached
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Memcached
- No persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- No replication or failover, so losing a node loses that share of the cache
- Only simple key-value, with none of the lists, sorted sets or streams Redis offers
- Values are capped at 1MB by default, which surprises teams caching large documents
SurrealDB
- The listed $0.192/node/hr Scale pricing lacks transparent higher-tier rates, requiring a sales conversation for full production sizing.
- As a newer multi-model database, it has a smaller ecosystem of drivers, ORMs and community tooling than established single-model databases.
- HIPAA compliance is only available as an Enterprise add-on rather than included in standard paid tiers.
- Combining multiple data models in one engine can add query-planning complexity compared to purpose-built single-model databases.
Pricing, plan by plan
Memcached
Free- MemcachedFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
SurrealDB
Free- StartFree
- 1 free instance, then from $0.021/hr
- 1GB storage free forever
- Vertical scaling to terabytes
- Scale$0.192/month
- $0.192/node/hr
- Production-grade fault tolerance
- Horizontal scaling to petabytes
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Self-hosted, custom pricing
- Clustered fault-tolerant deployments
- FIPS-compliant cryptography
Which should you pick?
Choose Memcached if
- You need in-memory key-value cache.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want multithreaded.
Choose SurrealDB if
- You need multi-model engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api, windows, mac, linux.
- You also want acid transactions.
Questions people ask
- Is Memcached or SurrealDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Memcached starts at Free and SurrealDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Memcached or SurrealDB?
- Memcached starts at Free and SurrealDB at Free.
- Does Memcached or SurrealDB run on more platforms?
- Memcached runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted. SurrealDB runs on web, api, windows, mac, linux.
- Can I use Memcached for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Memcached best used for?
- Memcached is most often used for caching expensive database query results to cut load, session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable, fronting an api whose responses are costly and change slowly. Of those, caching expensive database query results to cut load and session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable are not what SurrealDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Memcached do that SurrealDB cannot?
- Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Multithreaded, Client-side sharding, Predictable memory use. SurrealDB covers Multi-model engine, ACID transactions, Hybrid retrieval, Horizontal scaling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Memcached: Is Memcached free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
SurrealDB: What does SurrealDB cost?
SurrealDB Cloud's Start plan is free with one free instance (then from $0.021/hr), the Scale plan runs $0.192/node/hr for production workloads, and Enterprise self-hosted deployments use custom pricing.
SourceMemcached: Memcached or Redis?
Memcached is a pure cache: simpler, multithreaded and very predictable. Redis adds persistence, replication and rich data structures, which is why it is the default choice unless you specifically want a cache and nothing more.
SurrealDB: Is there a free plan and what are its limits?
Yes, the Start plan includes one free instance with 1GB of storage free forever and 1GB of outbound data transfer per month, aimed at prototypes and development.
SourceMemcached: Does Memcached persist data?
No. Everything is in memory and lost on restart, by design.
SurrealDB: How is billing handled?
Customers are invoiced monthly based on actual usage in a pay-as-you-go model with no long-term commitments, though commitment-based discounts are available.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Memcached vs Dragonfly
- Memcached vs Valkey
- Memcached vs Readyset
- Memcached vs PostgreSQL
- Memcached vs DuckDB
- Memcached vs DynamoDB
- Memcached vs NATS
- Memcached vs Apache Pulsar
- Memcached vs Presto
- Memcached vs Timeplus
- Memcached vs RabbitMQ
- Memcached vs EMQX
- Memcached vs FaunaDB
- Memcached vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Memcached vs MotherDuck
- Memcached vs Neo4j
- Memcached vs Apache Kafka
- Memcached vs Firestore
- Memcached vs Turso
- Memcached vs Vespa
- Memcached vs Zilliz
- Memcached vs ArangoDB
- Memcached vs RavenDB
- Memcached vs Oracle Database
- Memcached vs TimescaleDB
- Memcached vs Estuary
- Memcached vs QuestDB
- Memcached vs CosmosDB
- Memcached vs DataGrip
- Memcached vs Firebolt
- Memcached vs Google Cloud SQL
- Memcached vs Microsoft SQL Server
- SurrealDB vs Dragonfly
- SurrealDB vs Valkey
- SurrealDB vs Readyset
- SurrealDB vs PostgreSQL
- SurrealDB vs DuckDB
- SurrealDB vs DynamoDB
- SurrealDB vs NATS
- SurrealDB vs Apache Pulsar
- SurrealDB vs Presto
- SurrealDB vs Timeplus
- SurrealDB vs RabbitMQ
- SurrealDB vs EMQX
- SurrealDB vs FaunaDB
- SurrealDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- SurrealDB vs MotherDuck
- SurrealDB vs Neo4j
- SurrealDB vs Apache Kafka
- SurrealDB vs Firestore
- SurrealDB vs Turso
- SurrealDB vs Vespa
- SurrealDB vs Zilliz
- SurrealDB vs ArangoDB
- SurrealDB vs RavenDB
- SurrealDB vs Oracle Database
- SurrealDB vs TimescaleDB
- SurrealDB vs Estuary
- SurrealDB vs QuestDB
- SurrealDB vs CosmosDB
- SurrealDB vs DataGrip
- SurrealDB vs Firebolt
- SurrealDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- SurrealDB vs Microsoft SQL Server
