Marketing · head to head
Ahrefs vs CrowdTangle

Ahrefs
Marketing
Backlink and keyword research platform run on its own web crawler, metered by credits since 2024
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
CrowdTangle
News
Social media insights and content monitoring platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Ahrefs has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Ahrefs the April 2024 move from unlimited usage to credits was a real downgrade for existing customers: Lite meters 1,000 credits per user per month and the data tools lock when they are gone, so heavy research on the entry plan now forces an upgrade to Standard at 249 USD.; CrowdTangle crowdTangle was retired by Meta on 14 August 2024, per Meta's own transparency page (Internet Archive capture, 12 December 2024), with Meta Content Library and Content Library API offered as replacements
- They diverge on capability: Ahrefs covers Site Explorer, CrowdTangle covers Social listening.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ahrefs and CrowdTangle actually diverge.
| Attribute | Ahrefs | CrowdTangle |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per month by credits and usage limits | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Category | Marketing | News |
| Founded | 2010 | 2011 |
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ahrefs
- Site Explorer
- Keywords Explorer
- Site Audit
- Rank Tracker
- Content Explorer
- Competitive analysis
- Backlink checker
- Keyword research
Only in CrowdTangle
- Social listening
- Viral content tracking
- Competitor monitoring
- Brand mention tracking
- Trending alerts
- Custom dashboards
- Team collaboration
- Report generation
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ahrefs
- SEO researchnot CrowdTangle
- Competitor analysis
- Content planningnot CrowdTangle
- Backlink analysisnot CrowdTangle
- Rank trackingnot CrowdTangle
CrowdTangle
- Viral content trackingnot Ahrefs
- Social listeningnot Ahrefs
- Competitor analysis
- Trend identificationnot Ahrefs
Both are used for competitor analysis, on those jobs the choice comes down to price and fit rather than capability.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ahrefs
- The April 2024 move from unlimited usage to credits was a real downgrade for existing customers: Lite meters 1,000 credits per user per month and the data tools lock when they are gone, so heavy research on the entry plan now forces an upgrade to Standard at 249 USD.
- Pay-as-you-go credits are charged automatically once enabled, so a busy research month can produce an unbudgeted overage bill rather than a hard stop.
- Every paid tier includes exactly one user, and additional seats cost 40, 60 or 80 USD a month by tier, so a three-person team on Standard pays 369 USD a month rather than 249.
- Row caps bind before credit caps for many jobs: Lite returns at most 2,500 rows per report, which is not enough to export a mid-sized site backlink profile in one pass.
- Ahrefs states plainly that it never runs discounts and offers no free trial of the paid plans, so evaluation means paying a full month or working from the ownership-verified free tier.
- Rank Tracker updates weekly on every tier including Enterprise, so teams needing daily positions have to buy a separate tracker such as SE Ranking or Semrush.
- A growing share of capability is sold as add-ons rather than included: Report Builder at 99 USD a month, Content Kit from 99 USD, Project Boost at 20 or 200 USD per project, and Brand Radar from 199 USD.
CrowdTangle
- CrowdTangle was retired by Meta on 14 August 2024, per Meta's own transparency page (Internet Archive capture, 12 December 2024), with Meta Content Library and Content Library API offered as replacements
Pricing, plan by plan
Ahrefs
Free- Ahrefs FreeFree
- Limited Site Explorer and Site Audit for sites you verify ownership of
- No access to competitor data
- Where paid subscriptions land after cancellation
- Starter$29/month
- Search and competitor data with reduced row limits
- No projects tier of the main plan ladder
- Sits below Lite on the published pricing page
- Lite$129/month
- 1 user included, up to 2 more at 40 USD each per month
- 1,000 credits per user per month, the only tier with a credit cap
- 5 projects, 750 tracked keywords, 6 months of historical data
- Standard$249/month
- 1 user included, up to 5 more at 60 USD each per month
- Unlimited report credits under fair use
- 20 projects, 2,000 tracked keywords, 2 years of historical data
CrowdTangle
On request- Custom Plan$undefined/custom
- Social monitoring
- Competitor analysis
- Trending content tracking
Which should you pick?
Choose Ahrefs if
- You need site explorer.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want keywords explorer.
Choose CrowdTangle if
- You need social listening.
- You also want viral content tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is Ahrefs or CrowdTangle better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ahrefs starts at Free and CrowdTangle at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ahrefs or CrowdTangle?
- Ahrefs has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Ahrefs and On request for CrowdTangle.
- Does Ahrefs or CrowdTangle run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Ahrefs for free?
- Yes. Ahrefs has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. CrowdTangle starts at On request.
- What is Ahrefs best used for?
- Ahrefs is most often used for seo research, competitor analysis, content planning, backlink analysis. Of those, seo research and content planning are not what CrowdTangle is typically brought in for.
- What can Ahrefs do that CrowdTangle cannot?
- Ahrefs covers Site Explorer, Keywords Explorer, Site Audit, Rank Tracker. CrowdTangle covers Social listening, Viral content tracking, Competitor monitoring, Brand mention tracking. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ahrefs: How much does Ahrefs cost?
Starter is 29 USD a month, Lite 129, Standard 249, Advanced 449 and Enterprise 1,499 with an annual commitment. Paying annually saves up to 17 percent, which Ahrefs describes as two months free, and it is arranged through support rather than on the site.
Ahrefs: What are Ahrefs credits and when did they start?
Ahrefs replaced unlimited report usage with credits in April 2024. It meters report credits, crawl credits and API units. Lite includes 1,000 credits per user per month; Standard and above are unlimited under a fair use policy. Purchased pay-as-you-go credits last three billing months.
Ahrefs: Is Ahrefs or Moz better?
Ahrefs has the deeper and fresher link index and stronger competitive research, and it is the default for link work. Moz is cheaper at entry, owns Domain Authority as a reportable metric, and has a real local listings product. If you report DA to clients or manage multi-location listings, Moz earns its place; otherwise Ahrefs wins on data.
Ahrefs: Is there a free version or a trial?
There is Ahrefs Free, limited to Site Explorer and Site Audit on sites you verify you own, so it gives you no competitor data. Ahrefs states it never runs discounts and does not offer a trial of the paid plans.
Ahrefs: How many users are included?
One, on every paid tier up to Advanced. Extra seats cost 40 USD a month on Lite, 60 on Standard, 80 on Advanced and 100 on Enterprise, and unpaid additional users are billed automatically as pay-as-you-go.
Related pages
More on CrowdTangle
Other head to heads
- Ahrefs vs Moz
- Ahrefs vs Octoboard
- Ahrefs vs Buffer
- Ahrefs vs Hootsuite
- Ahrefs vs Vimeo
- Ahrefs vs Google Analytics
- Ahrefs vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Ahrefs vs CallRail
- Ahrefs vs Optimove
- Ahrefs vs Roxhill
- Ahrefs vs Swydo
- Ahrefs vs Mailgun
- Ahrefs vs AB Tasty
- Ahrefs vs Dreamdata
- Ahrefs vs Triple Whale
- Ahrefs vs Adobe Analytics
- Ahrefs vs Beehiiv
- Ahrefs vs Feedly
- Ahrefs vs Inoreader
- Ahrefs vs Chartbeat
- Ahrefs vs NewsWhip
- Ahrefs vs Agility PR Solutions
- Ahrefs vs Meltwater
- Ahrefs vs Reeder
- Ahrefs vs Flipboard
- Ahrefs vs Muck Rack
- Ahrefs vs NetNewsWire
- Ahrefs vs Medium
- Ahrefs vs Google News
- Ahrefs vs Apple News
- Ahrefs vs Arc Publishing
- CrowdTangle vs Moz
- CrowdTangle vs Octoboard
- CrowdTangle vs Buffer
- CrowdTangle vs Hootsuite
- CrowdTangle vs Vimeo
- CrowdTangle vs Google Analytics
- CrowdTangle vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- CrowdTangle vs CallRail
- CrowdTangle vs Optimove
- CrowdTangle vs Roxhill
- CrowdTangle vs Swydo
- CrowdTangle vs Mailgun
- CrowdTangle vs AB Tasty
- CrowdTangle vs Dreamdata
- CrowdTangle vs Triple Whale
- CrowdTangle vs Adobe Analytics
- CrowdTangle vs Beehiiv
- CrowdTangle vs Feedly
- CrowdTangle vs Inoreader
- CrowdTangle vs Chartbeat
- CrowdTangle vs NewsWhip
- CrowdTangle vs Agility PR Solutions
- CrowdTangle vs Meltwater
- CrowdTangle vs Reeder
- CrowdTangle vs Flipboard
- CrowdTangle vs Muck Rack
- CrowdTangle vs NetNewsWire
- CrowdTangle vs Medium
- CrowdTangle vs Google News
- CrowdTangle vs Apple News
- CrowdTangle vs Arc Publishing
