Legal · head to head
CosmoLex vs Relativity

CosmoLex
Legal
Practice management with a full legal general ledger and trust accounting built in
- From
- $89/month
- Rated
- -

Relativity
Legal
Ediscovery and legal data platform for large matters
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CosmoLex the built-in accounting suits a single law firm entity, so practices with multiple entities, payroll or unusual revenue recognition still need an external accountant and a second system.; Relativity quote-only and expensive, typically billed on data volume, so costs escalate with matter size
- They diverge on capability: CosmoLex covers Built-in general ledger, Relativity covers Large-scale processing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CosmoLex and Relativity actually diverge.
| Attribute | CosmoLex | Relativity |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $89/month | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | quote |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Cloud, Self-hosted |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CosmoLex
- Built-in general ledger
- Three-way trust reconciliation
- Time and expense capture
- Billing and LEDES
- CosmoLex Pay
- Matter management
Only in Relativity
- Large-scale processing
- Review workflow
- Analytics and active learning
- Application ecosystem
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CosmoLex
- A two to ten lawyer firm that wants to stop paying for and reconciling QuickBooks alongside its practice systemnot Relativity
- A firm that has failed or fears failing a bar trust account audit and needs three-way reconciliation as standardnot Relativity
- A solo practice with no bookkeeper that needs the books to be correct without accounting knowledgenot Relativity
- A firm doing insurer defence work that must produce LEDES invoices without a separate billing toolnot Relativity
Relativity
- Large litigation with very high document volumesnot CosmoLex
- Corporate investigations requiring defensible, auditable reviewnot CosmoLex
- Firms whose review process is already built around the platformnot CosmoLex
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CosmoLex
- The built-in accounting suits a single law firm entity, so practices with multiple entities, payroll or unusual revenue recognition still need an external accountant and a second system.
- Document management is basic storage rather than versioned matter-centric DMS, so firms with heavy document workflow outgrow it and bolt on something else.
- The integration catalogue is materially smaller than Clio, so niche intake, e-discovery or automation tools often require manual export instead of a native connection.
- Ownership sits with ProfitSolv alongside Tabs3, TimeSolv and Rocket Matter, and buyers have limited visibility into which brand receives investment over a three-year contract.
- The interface and reporting feel dated next to newer competitors, and custom reporting in particular often means exporting to a spreadsheet.
Relativity
- Quote-only and expensive, typically billed on data volume, so costs escalate with matter size
- Complex enough that certified specialists are a job title, which is a real staffing cost
- Considerable overkill for small matters, where lighter self-service tools are far cheaper
Pricing, plan by plan
CosmoLex
$89/month- CosmoLex$89/month
- Per user per month billed annually, higher month to month
- General ledger and trust accounting included rather than sold as an add-on
- Payment processing charged at card and bank transaction rates
Relativity
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Relativity review.
Which should you pick?
Choose CosmoLex if
- You need built-in general ledger.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want three-way trust reconciliation.
Choose Relativity if
- You need large-scale processing.
- You work on Web, Cloud, Self-hosted.
- You also want review workflow.
Questions people ask
- Is CosmoLex or Relativity better?
- Neither clearly leads. CosmoLex starts at $89/month and Relativity at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CosmoLex or Relativity?
- CosmoLex starts at $89/month and Relativity at On request.
- Does CosmoLex or Relativity run on more platforms?
- CosmoLex runs on Web, iOS, Android. Relativity runs on Web, Cloud, Self-hosted.
- What is CosmoLex best used for?
- CosmoLex is most often used for a two to ten lawyer firm that wants to stop paying for and reconciling quickbooks alongside its practice system, a firm that has failed or fears failing a bar trust account audit and needs three-way reconciliation as standard, a solo practice with no bookkeeper that needs the books to be correct without accounting knowledge, a firm doing insurer defence work that must produce ledes invoices without a separate billing tool. Of those, a two to ten lawyer firm that wants to stop paying for and reconciling quickbooks alongside its practice system and a firm that has failed or fears failing a bar trust account audit and needs three-way reconciliation as standard are not what Relativity is typically brought in for.
- What can CosmoLex do that Relativity cannot?
- CosmoLex covers Built-in general ledger, Three-way trust reconciliation, Time and expense capture, Billing and LEDES. Relativity covers Large-scale processing, Review workflow, Analytics and active learning, Application ecosystem.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CosmoLex: Do I still need QuickBooks?
No. CosmoLex carries its own general ledger and trust ledgers, which is the main reason firms choose it over Clio or MyCase.
Relativity: What does Relativity cost?
It does not publish rates. Ediscovery is generally billed on data volume and users, quoted per matter or organisation.
CosmoLex: Does it handle IOLTA compliance?
Yes. Trust ledgers, overdraft prevention and three-way reconciliation are in the core product rather than in a paid tier.
Relativity: Is Relativity only for law firms?
No. Corporate legal departments and government agencies use it for investigations as well as litigation.
CosmoLex: Who owns CosmoLex?
ProfitSolv, a private-equity backed group that also owns Tabs3, TimeSolv, ImagineTime and Rocket Matter.
Relativity: Do I need trained staff?
In practice yes. Relativity certification is a recognised specialism, and that staffing cost is part of the total.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CosmoLex vs Tabs3
- CosmoLex vs Aderant
- CosmoLex vs Clio
- CosmoLex vs Smokeball
- CosmoLex vs MyCase
- CosmoLex vs Actionstep
- CosmoLex vs Docketwise
- CosmoLex vs Litera
- CosmoLex vs iubenda
- CosmoLex vs Filevine
- CosmoLex vs Harvey
- CosmoLex vs Ironclad
- CosmoLex vs Lawmatics
- CosmoLex vs LexisNexis
- CosmoLex vs Luminance
- CosmoLex vs Everlaw
- CosmoLex vs Logikcull
- CosmoLex vs DISCO
- CosmoLex vs Westlaw
- CosmoLex vs iManage
- CosmoLex vs CASEpeer
- CosmoLex vs Cookiebot
- Relativity vs Tabs3
- Relativity vs Aderant
- Relativity vs Clio
- Relativity vs Smokeball
- Relativity vs MyCase
- Relativity vs Actionstep
- Relativity vs Docketwise
- Relativity vs Litera
- Relativity vs iubenda
- Relativity vs Filevine
- Relativity vs Harvey
- Relativity vs Ironclad
- Relativity vs Lawmatics
- Relativity vs LexisNexis
- Relativity vs Luminance
- Relativity vs Everlaw
- Relativity vs Logikcull
- Relativity vs DISCO
- Relativity vs Westlaw
- Relativity vs iManage
- Relativity vs CASEpeer
- Relativity vs Cookiebot
