Cybersecurity · head to head
Acunetix vs Transmit Security

Acunetix
Cybersecurity
Web application security testing made easy
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Transmit Security
Cybersecurity
Customer identity platform built around passwordless and fraud signals
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Acunetix pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online; Transmit Security pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared early against competitors that post per monthly active user rates, and the eventual quote often mixes per-user and per-transaction units.
- They diverge on capability: Acunetix covers DAST scanning, Transmit Security covers Passwordless authentication.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Acunetix and Transmit Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | Acunetix | Transmit Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Desktop, Web, Api | Web, iOS, Android |
| Founded | 2005 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Acunetix
- DAST scanning
- IAST technology
- AcuSensor
- JavaScript security
- SQL injection testing
- XSS detection
- OWASP Top 10
- API security testing
Only in Transmit Security
- Passwordless authentication
- Detection and response
- Identity verification
- Orchestration
- Account recovery
- Bot and automation detection
- Composable APIs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Acunetix
- Scanning web applications for security vulnerabilitiesnot Transmit Security
- Testing APIs for exploitable weaknesses and threatsnot Transmit Security
- Automating dynamic application security testing (DAST)not Transmit Security
- Finding and validating security issues in production environmentsnot Transmit Security
Transmit Security
- A bank moving a consumer base off passwords to passkeys without losing customers at the migration stepnot Acunetix
- An insurer whose account recovery flow is the main account takeover route and needs risk scoring inside itnot Acunetix
- A retailer that wants bot detection at login rather than only at checkoutnot Acunetix
- An organisation replacing an in-house customer login system that has become an unfunded engineering liabilitynot Acunetix
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Acunetix
- Pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online
- Requires per-application licenses for comprehensive coverage
- Scanning speed and feature depth depend on subscription tier
- Advanced features like API security testing may require higher-tier plans
Transmit Security
- Pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared early against competitors that post per monthly active user rates, and the eventual quote often mixes per-user and per-transaction units.
- Migrating a live consumer identity base is a high risk project, and credential migration constraints mean some users must re-register, which shows up as measurable churn.
- The vendor is smaller than the identity incumbents, so the partner and systems integrator pool is thinner and staffing a large programme is harder.
- Workforce identity is not the focus, so an organisation wanting one vendor for employees and customers will still run two platforms.
- The fraud detection value depends on traffic volume feeding the models, so a smaller deployment gets less benefit from exactly the capability that justified choosing it over a plain identity provider.
Pricing, plan by plan
Acunetix
On request- StandardFree
- Single user
- 5 targets
- Scheduled scans
- PremiumFree
- Multiple users
- Unlimited targets
- CI/CD integration
- Acunetix 360Free
- Enterprise features
- SDLC integration
- Custom workflows
Transmit Security
On request- Transmit Security Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per monthly active user or per transaction by service
- Services licensed individually or as a platform
- Free developer tier for evaluation
Which should you pick?
Choose Acunetix if
- You need dast scanning.
- You work on Desktop, Web, Api.
- You also want iast technology.
Choose Transmit Security if
- You need passwordless authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want detection and response.
Questions people ask
- Is Acunetix or Transmit Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. Acunetix starts at On request and Transmit Security at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Acunetix or Transmit Security?
- Acunetix starts at On request and Transmit Security at On request.
- Does Acunetix or Transmit Security run on more platforms?
- Acunetix runs on Desktop, Web, Api. Transmit Security runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Acunetix best used for?
- Acunetix is most often used for scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities, testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats, automating dynamic application security testing (dast), finding and validating security issues in production environments. Of those, scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities and testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats are not what Transmit Security is typically brought in for.
- What can Acunetix do that Transmit Security cannot?
- Acunetix covers DAST scanning, IAST technology, AcuSensor, JavaScript security. Transmit Security covers Passwordless authentication, Detection and response, Identity verification, Orchestration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Acunetix: How much does Invicti (formerly Acunetix) cost?
Invicti pricing is available by quote based on your organization's needs, application count, and required features. The platform offers 8x faster scanning compared to competitors and detects 99.98% of exploitable vulnerabilities. Contact Invicti sales for a custom pricing proposal.
SourceTransmit Security: Do we have to replace our existing identity provider?
No. The services are composable, so detection and response or verification can be adopted alongside an existing provider such as Okta or Entra ID.
Transmit Security: Is fraud detection an extra licence?
It is a separate service, but it is designed to run inside the authentication flow rather than as a bolted-on second vendor. Confirm which services are in your quote.
Transmit Security: Is there a way to try it?
Yes, a free developer tier exists for evaluation, though production use is an enterprise agreement.
Related pages
More on Transmit Security
Other head to heads
- Acunetix vs Norton 360
- Acunetix vs 1Password
- Acunetix vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Acunetix vs LastPass
- Acunetix vs Burp Suite
- Acunetix vs Veracode
- Acunetix vs Nessus
- Acunetix vs OWASP ZAP
- Acunetix vs Arnica
- Acunetix vs Doppler
- Acunetix vs Aikido
- Acunetix vs NordPass
- Acunetix vs One Identity
- Acunetix vs Ory Kratos
- Acunetix vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Acunetix vs Tenable Nessus
- Acunetix vs Descope
- Acunetix vs NICE Actimize
- Acunetix vs Beyond Identity
- Acunetix vs Sardine
- Acunetix vs Feedzai
- Acunetix vs Socure
- Acunetix vs Unit21
- Acunetix vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Acunetix vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Acunetix vs Ping Identity
- Acunetix vs Stytch
- Acunetix vs Rhombus Systems
- Acunetix vs Semgrep
- Acunetix vs Spot AI
- Acunetix vs Syft
- Acunetix vs ThetaRay
- Acunetix vs Trivy
- Acunetix vs Trulioo
- Transmit Security vs Norton 360
- Transmit Security vs 1Password
- Transmit Security vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Transmit Security vs LastPass
- Transmit Security vs Burp Suite
- Transmit Security vs Veracode
- Transmit Security vs Nessus
- Transmit Security vs OWASP ZAP
- Transmit Security vs Arnica
- Transmit Security vs Doppler
- Transmit Security vs Aikido
- Transmit Security vs NordPass
- Transmit Security vs One Identity
- Transmit Security vs Ory Kratos
- Transmit Security vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Transmit Security vs Tenable Nessus
- Transmit Security vs Descope
- Transmit Security vs NICE Actimize
- Transmit Security vs Beyond Identity
- Transmit Security vs Sardine
- Transmit Security vs Feedzai
- Transmit Security vs Socure
- Transmit Security vs Unit21
- Transmit Security vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Transmit Security vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Transmit Security vs Ping Identity
- Transmit Security vs Stytch
- Transmit Security vs Rhombus Systems
- Transmit Security vs Semgrep
- Transmit Security vs Spot AI
- Transmit Security vs Syft
- Transmit Security vs ThetaRay
- Transmit Security vs Trivy
- Transmit Security vs Trulioo
