Cybersecurity · head to head
Acunetix vs Feedzai

Acunetix
Cybersecurity
Web application security testing made easy
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Feedzai
Cybersecurity
Real-time transaction fraud and financial crime detection for banks and payment processors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Acunetix pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online; Feedzai pricing is per transaction with an annual minimum, so a bank with seasonal or growing volume commits to a floor it may not use and pays overage above the band.
- They diverge on capability: Acunetix covers DAST scanning, Feedzai covers Real-time scoring.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Acunetix and Feedzai actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Acunetix
- DAST scanning
- IAST technology
- AcuSensor
- JavaScript security
- SQL injection testing
- XSS detection
- OWASP Top 10
- API security testing
Only in Feedzai
- Real-time scoring
- Rule and model hybrid
- Case manager
- Behavioural biometrics
- Model explainability
- Deployment options
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Acunetix
- Scanning web applications for security vulnerabilitiesnot Feedzai
- Testing APIs for exploitable weaknesses and threatsnot Feedzai
- Automating dynamic application security testing (DAST)not Feedzai
- Finding and validating security issues in production environmentsnot Feedzai
Feedzai
- A bank joining an instant payments scheme where transfers are irrevocable and post-hoc recovery is impossiblenot Acunetix
- A card issuer whose existing rules engine cannot be changed without a release, so fraud waves run for daysnot Acunetix
- An acquirer needing per-merchant risk models rather than one portfolio-wide modelnot Acunetix
- A bank required by its regulator to explain automated declines to customers, which rules out opaque scoringnot Acunetix
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Acunetix
- Pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online
- Requires per-application licenses for comprehensive coverage
- Scanning speed and feature depth depend on subscription tier
- Advanced features like API security testing may require higher-tier plans
Feedzai
- Pricing is per transaction with an annual minimum, so a bank with seasonal or growing volume commits to a floor it may not use and pays overage above the band.
- It sits in the authorisation path, which makes every upgrade a change-controlled event with rollback plans, and the operational burden falls on the bank rather than the vendor.
- Out of the box models need months of the customer own labelled fraud history before they beat the rules they replace, so the value case starts late.
- AML and fraud are licensed as separate modules, so institutions expecting one platform fee find the transaction monitoring capability is a second line item.
- The buyer profile is large institutions, so smaller banks and fintechs face minimums that make per-transaction economics unattractive below significant scale.
Pricing, plan by plan
Acunetix
On request- StandardFree
- Single user
- 5 targets
- Scheduled scans
- PremiumFree
- Multiple users
- Unlimited targets
- CI/CD integration
- Acunetix 360Free
- Enterprise features
- SDLC integration
- Custom workflows
Feedzai
On request- Feedzai Financial Crime Platform$undefined/year
- Priced by transaction volume with annual minimum commitment
- Modules for fraud, AML and account opening licensed separately
- Cloud, private cloud and on-premises deployment
Which should you pick?
Choose Acunetix if
- You need dast scanning.
- You work on Desktop, Web, Api.
- You also want iast technology.
Choose Feedzai if
- You need real-time scoring.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want rule and model hybrid.
Questions people ask
- Is Acunetix or Feedzai better?
- Neither clearly leads. Acunetix starts at On request and Feedzai at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Acunetix or Feedzai?
- Acunetix starts at On request and Feedzai at On request.
- Does Acunetix or Feedzai run on more platforms?
- Acunetix runs on Desktop, Web, Api. Feedzai runs on Web, Linux.
- What is Acunetix best used for?
- Acunetix is most often used for scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities, testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats, automating dynamic application security testing (dast), finding and validating security issues in production environments. Of those, scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities and testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats are not what Feedzai is typically brought in for.
- What can Acunetix do that Feedzai cannot?
- Acunetix covers DAST scanning, IAST technology, AcuSensor, JavaScript security. Feedzai covers Real-time scoring, Rule and model hybrid, Case manager, Behavioural biometrics.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Acunetix: How much does Invicti (formerly Acunetix) cost?
Invicti pricing is available by quote based on your organization's needs, application count, and required features. The platform offers 8x faster scanning compared to competitors and detects 99.98% of exploitable vulnerabilities. Contact Invicti sales for a custom pricing proposal.
SourceFeedzai: Can Feedzai run on-premises?
Yes. On-premises and private cloud deployments are supported, which is why it appears in markets where transaction data cannot legally leave the country.
Feedzai: Does it cover AML as well as fraud?
It does, but transaction monitoring is a separately licensed module. Assume two line items if you want both.
Feedzai: How fast are decisions?
Designed for the authorisation window, typically tens of milliseconds. This is the constraint that rules out batch scoring architectures.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Acunetix vs Norton 360
- Acunetix vs 1Password
- Acunetix vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Acunetix vs LastPass
- Acunetix vs Burp Suite
- Acunetix vs Veracode
- Acunetix vs Nessus
- Acunetix vs OWASP ZAP
- Acunetix vs Arnica
- Acunetix vs Doppler
- Acunetix vs Aikido
- Acunetix vs NordPass
- Acunetix vs One Identity
- Acunetix vs Ory Kratos
- Acunetix vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Acunetix vs Tenable Nessus
- Acunetix vs Unit21
- Acunetix vs ThetaRay
- Acunetix vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Acunetix vs NICE Actimize
- Acunetix vs Quantexa
- Acunetix vs Sardine
- Acunetix vs Silent Eight
- Acunetix vs Transmit Security
- Acunetix vs Fenergo
- Acunetix vs Socure
- Acunetix vs Sumsub
- Acunetix vs iDenfy
- Acunetix vs BeyondTrust
- Acunetix vs Bitdefender VPN
- Acunetix vs Check Point Software
- Acunetix vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Acunetix vs Darktrace
- Feedzai vs Norton 360
- Feedzai vs 1Password
- Feedzai vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Feedzai vs LastPass
- Feedzai vs Burp Suite
- Feedzai vs Veracode
- Feedzai vs Nessus
- Feedzai vs OWASP ZAP
- Feedzai vs Arnica
- Feedzai vs Doppler
- Feedzai vs Aikido
- Feedzai vs NordPass
- Feedzai vs One Identity
- Feedzai vs Ory Kratos
- Feedzai vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Feedzai vs Tenable Nessus
- Feedzai vs Unit21
- Feedzai vs ThetaRay
- Feedzai vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Feedzai vs NICE Actimize
- Feedzai vs Quantexa
- Feedzai vs Sardine
- Feedzai vs Silent Eight
- Feedzai vs Transmit Security
- Feedzai vs Fenergo
- Feedzai vs Socure
- Feedzai vs Sumsub
- Feedzai vs iDenfy
- Feedzai vs BeyondTrust
- Feedzai vs Bitdefender VPN
- Feedzai vs Check Point Software
- Feedzai vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Feedzai vs Darktrace
