Cybersecurity · head to head
Acunetix vs Stytch

Acunetix
Cybersecurity
Web application security testing made easy
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Stytch
Cybersecurity
Identity platform with passwordless auth, passkeys and bot detection.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Stytch has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Acunetix pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online; Stytch free tier limited to 10,000 monthly active users; scaling beyond this requires custom pricing negotiation
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Acunetix and Stytch actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Acunetix
- DAST scanning
- IAST technology
- AcuSensor
- JavaScript security
- SQL injection testing
- XSS detection
- OWASP Top 10
- API security testing
Only in Stytch
Nothing recorded that Acunetix does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Acunetix
- Scanning web applications for security vulnerabilitiesnot Stytch
- Testing APIs for exploitable weaknesses and threatsnot Stytch
- Automating dynamic application security testing (DAST)not Stytch
- Finding and validating security issues in production environmentsnot Stytch
Stytch
- Applications prioritising passwordless and passkey authenticationnot Acunetix
- SaaS platforms requiring AI agent authentication and machine-to-machine flowsnot Acunetix
- Companies with emerging identity needs such as bot detection and device intelligencenot Acunetix
- Organisations building with Next.js and React requiring modern auth patternsnot Acunetix
- Applications needing transparent pricing without surprise tiers or feature gatingnot Acunetix
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Acunetix
- Pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online
- Requires per-application licenses for comprehensive coverage
- Scanning speed and feature depth depend on subscription tier
- Advanced features like API security testing may require higher-tier plans
Stytch
- Free tier limited to 10,000 monthly active users; scaling beyond this requires custom pricing negotiation
- Fraud prevention capabilities billed at $0.005 per fingerprint for usage exceeding 10,000 free checks
- Additional SSO or SCIM connections beyond the 5 included in free tier cost $125 each
- Brand customisation and email removal require one-time payment of $99
- HIPAA and advanced fraud protection only available in Enterprise tier
- No native UI builder; requires custom frontend development for fully-branded auth flows
Pricing, plan by plan
Acunetix
On request- StandardFree
- Single user
- 5 targets
- Scheduled scans
- PremiumFree
- Multiple users
- Unlimited targets
- CI/CD integration
- Acunetix 360Free
- Enterprise features
- SDLC integration
- Custom workflows
Stytch
Free- FreeFree
- 10,000 monthly active users and AI agents
- Unlimited organisations
- 5 SSO or SCIM connections
- Scaled$undefined/variable
- Usage-based pricing for users exceeding 10,000
- All free tier features
- Volume discounts available
- Enterprise$undefined/variable
- Custom pricing
- Discounted volume rates
- Enterprise support SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Acunetix if
- You need dast scanning.
- You work on Desktop, Web, Api.
- You also want iast technology.
Questions people ask
- Is Acunetix or Stytch better?
- Neither clearly leads. Acunetix starts at On request and Stytch at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Acunetix or Stytch?
- Stytch has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Acunetix and Free for Stytch.
- Does Acunetix or Stytch run on more platforms?
- Acunetix runs on Desktop, Web, Api. Stytch runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Stytch for free?
- Yes. Stytch has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Acunetix starts at On request.
- What is Acunetix best used for?
- Acunetix is most often used for scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities, testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats, automating dynamic application security testing (dast), finding and validating security issues in production environments. Of those, scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities and testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats are not what Stytch is typically brought in for.
- What can Acunetix do that Stytch cannot?
- Acunetix covers DAST scanning, IAST technology, AcuSensor, JavaScript security.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Acunetix: How much does Invicti (formerly Acunetix) cost?
Invicti pricing is available by quote based on your organization's needs, application count, and required features. The platform offers 8x faster scanning compared to competitors and detects 99.98% of exploitable vulnerabilities. Contact Invicti sales for a custom pricing proposal.
SourceStytch: What is included in Stytch's free tier?
The free tier includes 10,000 monthly active users (human and AI agents), unlimited organisations, 5 SSO or SCIM connections, and 1,000 machine-to-machine tokens with full authentication features.
SourceStytch: Does Stytch support AI agent authentication?
Yes. Stytch provides native AI agent authentication and authorisation, with support for the Model Context Protocol (MCP) for authenticating AI agents accessing external systems.
SourceStytch: What fraud prevention features does Stytch offer?
Stytch includes bot detection with 99.99% accuracy, device fingerprinting, invisible CAPTCHA, and zero-day device intelligence built into all tiers.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Acunetix vs Norton 360
- Acunetix vs 1Password
- Acunetix vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Acunetix vs LastPass
- Acunetix vs Burp Suite
- Acunetix vs Veracode
- Acunetix vs Nessus
- Acunetix vs OWASP ZAP
- Acunetix vs Arnica
- Acunetix vs Doppler
- Acunetix vs Aikido
- Acunetix vs NordPass
- Acunetix vs One Identity
- Acunetix vs Ory Kratos
- Acunetix vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Acunetix vs Tenable Nessus
- Acunetix vs Cisco Duo
- Acunetix vs Transmit Security
- Acunetix vs Descope
- Acunetix vs Authy
- Acunetix vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Acunetix vs VMware Carbon Black
- Acunetix vs Feedzai
- Acunetix vs NICE Actimize
- Acunetix vs Salient CompleteView
- Acunetix vs Sumsub
- Acunetix vs Tuta
- Acunetix vs Camio
- Acunetix vs Clerk
- Stytch vs Norton 360
- Stytch vs 1Password
- Stytch vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Stytch vs LastPass
- Stytch vs Burp Suite
- Stytch vs Veracode
- Stytch vs Nessus
- Stytch vs OWASP ZAP
- Stytch vs Arnica
- Stytch vs Doppler
- Stytch vs Aikido
- Stytch vs NordPass
- Stytch vs One Identity
- Stytch vs Ory Kratos
- Stytch vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Stytch vs Tenable Nessus
- Stytch vs Cisco Duo
- Stytch vs Transmit Security
- Stytch vs Descope
- Stytch vs Authy
- Stytch vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Stytch vs VMware Carbon Black
- Stytch vs Feedzai
- Stytch vs NICE Actimize
- Stytch vs Salient CompleteView
- Stytch vs Sumsub
- Stytch vs Tuta
- Stytch vs Camio
- Stytch vs Clerk
