Cybersecurity · head to head
Acunetix vs ThetaRay

Acunetix
Cybersecurity
Web application security testing made easy
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

ThetaRay
Cybersecurity
Unsupervised AI transaction monitoring for cross-border and correspondent banking
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Acunetix pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online; ThetaRay unsupervised models are harder to justify to an examiner than explicit rules, and some regulators still expect documented threshold logic, which can force you to run both systems.
- They diverge on capability: Acunetix covers DAST scanning, ThetaRay covers Unsupervised detection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Acunetix and ThetaRay actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Acunetix
- DAST scanning
- IAST technology
- AcuSensor
- JavaScript security
- SQL injection testing
- XSS detection
- OWASP Top 10
- API security testing
Only in ThetaRay
- Unsupervised detection
- Cross-border focus
- Sanctions screening
- Alert triage
- Customer risk scoring
- Cloud native
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Acunetix
- Scanning web applications for security vulnerabilitiesnot ThetaRay
- Testing APIs for exploitable weaknesses and threatsnot ThetaRay
- Automating dynamic application security testing (DAST)not ThetaRay
- Finding and validating security issues in production environmentsnot ThetaRay
ThetaRay
- A correspondent bank that cannot see the ultimate originator and needs behavioural signals rather than counterparty listsnot Acunetix
- A cross-border payments fintech whose rules engine produces more alerts than its compliance team can clearnot Acunetix
- A bank under a regulatory consent order needing demonstrable improvement in detection within a fixed periodnot Acunetix
- A payment institution entering a high-risk corridor where existing thresholds were calibrated on domestic trafficnot Acunetix
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Acunetix
- Pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online
- Requires per-application licenses for comprehensive coverage
- Scanning speed and feature depth depend on subscription tier
- Advanced features like API security testing may require higher-tier plans
ThetaRay
- Unsupervised models are harder to justify to an examiner than explicit rules, and some regulators still expect documented threshold logic, which can force you to run both systems.
- The alert reduction claim depends heavily on your data, so a parallel run is essential and adds months and cost before you can decommission the incumbent.
- Coverage is strongest in cross-border and correspondent flows; institutions whose risk is domestic retail fraud will find the fit weaker than a general-purpose monitoring platform.
- It is a smaller vendor than the incumbents, so integration connectors into legacy core banking systems are often bespoke work rather than a supported adapter.
- Model retraining and tuning are vendor-led, which means changing detection behaviour is a support conversation rather than something your own analysts can do that afternoon.
Pricing, plan by plan
Acunetix
On request- StandardFree
- Single user
- 5 targets
- Scheduled scans
- PremiumFree
- Multiple users
- Unlimited targets
- CI/CD integration
- Acunetix 360Free
- Enterprise features
- SDLC integration
- Custom workflows
ThetaRay
On request- ThetaRay Sonar$undefined/year
- Priced by monitored transaction volume and number of monitored entities
- SaaS on Azure with regional data residency options
- Parallel run and model tuning included in onboarding
Which should you pick?
Choose Acunetix if
- You need dast scanning.
- You work on Desktop, Web, Api.
- You also want iast technology.
Questions people ask
- Is Acunetix or ThetaRay better?
- Neither clearly leads. Acunetix starts at On request and ThetaRay at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Acunetix or ThetaRay?
- Acunetix starts at On request and ThetaRay at On request.
- Does Acunetix or ThetaRay run on more platforms?
- Acunetix runs on Desktop, Web, Api. ThetaRay runs on Web.
- What is Acunetix best used for?
- Acunetix is most often used for scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities, testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats, automating dynamic application security testing (dast), finding and validating security issues in production environments. Of those, scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities and testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats are not what ThetaRay is typically brought in for.
- What can Acunetix do that ThetaRay cannot?
- Acunetix covers DAST scanning, IAST technology, AcuSensor, JavaScript security. ThetaRay covers Unsupervised detection, Cross-border focus, Sanctions screening, Alert triage.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Acunetix: How much does Invicti (formerly Acunetix) cost?
Invicti pricing is available by quote based on your organization's needs, application count, and required features. The platform offers 8x faster scanning compared to competitors and detects 99.98% of exploitable vulnerabilities. Contact Invicti sales for a custom pricing proposal.
SourceThetaRay: Does it replace a rules engine entirely?
Rarely on day one. Most institutions run it alongside existing rules during a parallel period, and some keep specific regulator-mandated rules permanently.
ThetaRay: Where is the data processed?
SaaS runs on Microsoft Azure with regional deployment options, which is the mechanism for meeting data residency conditions in regulated markets.
ThetaRay: Is sanctions screening included?
Screening is available on the same platform but licensed as part of the commercial package rather than bundled by default. Confirm it is in your quote.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Acunetix vs Norton 360
- Acunetix vs 1Password
- Acunetix vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Acunetix vs LastPass
- Acunetix vs Burp Suite
- Acunetix vs Veracode
- Acunetix vs Nessus
- Acunetix vs OWASP ZAP
- Acunetix vs Arnica
- Acunetix vs Doppler
- Acunetix vs Aikido
- Acunetix vs NordPass
- Acunetix vs One Identity
- Acunetix vs Ory Kratos
- Acunetix vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Acunetix vs Tenable Nessus
- Acunetix vs Feedzai
- Acunetix vs Unit21
- Acunetix vs Quantexa
- Acunetix vs Silent Eight
- Acunetix vs NICE Actimize
- Acunetix vs Sardine
- Acunetix vs Fenergo
- Acunetix vs Jumio
- Acunetix vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Acunetix vs Sumsub
- Acunetix vs iDenfy
- Acunetix vs Shufti Pro
- Acunetix vs VMware Carbon Black
- Acunetix vs Wireshark
- Acunetix vs WorkOS
- Acunetix vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Acunetix vs Milestone XProtect
- Acunetix vs Osano
- ThetaRay vs Norton 360
- ThetaRay vs 1Password
- ThetaRay vs Bitdefender Total Security
- ThetaRay vs LastPass
- ThetaRay vs Burp Suite
- ThetaRay vs Veracode
- ThetaRay vs Nessus
- ThetaRay vs OWASP ZAP
- ThetaRay vs Arnica
- ThetaRay vs Doppler
- ThetaRay vs Aikido
- ThetaRay vs NordPass
- ThetaRay vs One Identity
- ThetaRay vs Ory Kratos
- ThetaRay vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- ThetaRay vs Tenable Nessus
- ThetaRay vs Feedzai
- ThetaRay vs Unit21
- ThetaRay vs Quantexa
- ThetaRay vs Silent Eight
- ThetaRay vs NICE Actimize
- ThetaRay vs Sardine
- ThetaRay vs Fenergo
- ThetaRay vs Jumio
- ThetaRay vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- ThetaRay vs Sumsub
- ThetaRay vs iDenfy
- ThetaRay vs Shufti Pro
- ThetaRay vs VMware Carbon Black
- ThetaRay vs Wireshark
- ThetaRay vs WorkOS
- ThetaRay vs Zscaler Internet Access
- ThetaRay vs Milestone XProtect
- ThetaRay vs Osano
