Cybersecurity · head to head
Aikido vs ThetaRay

Aikido
Cybersecurity
Unified security platform automating vulnerability detection and fixing across development
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

ThetaRay
Cybersecurity
Unsupervised AI transaction monitoring for cross-border and correspondent banking
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Aikido has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Aikido free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images; ThetaRay unsupervised models are harder to justify to an examiner than explicit rules, and some regulators still expect documented threshold logic, which can force you to run both systems.
- They diverge on capability: Aikido covers Static Application Security Testing (SAST), ThetaRay covers Unsupervised detection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aikido and ThetaRay actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aikido
- Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
- Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
- AutoFix
- Secrets detection
- Cloud Security Posture Management
- AI-powered penetration testing
- Device protection
- False positive reduction
Only in ThetaRay
- Unsupervised detection
- Cross-border focus
- Sanctions screening
- Alert triage
- Customer risk scoring
- Cloud native
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aikido
- Developer-friendly security integrated into PR workflowsnot ThetaRay
- Automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alertsnot ThetaRay
- Consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecyclenot ThetaRay
- Cloud infrastructure security posture monitoringnot ThetaRay
- Supply chain attack prevention and malware detectionnot ThetaRay
ThetaRay
- A correspondent bank that cannot see the ultimate originator and needs behavioural signals rather than counterparty listsnot Aikido
- A cross-border payments fintech whose rules engine produces more alerts than its compliance team can clearnot Aikido
- A bank under a regulatory consent order needing demonstrable improvement in detection within a fixed periodnot Aikido
- A payment institution entering a high-risk corridor where existing thresholds were calibrated on domestic trafficnot Aikido
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aikido
- Free plan includes fair-usage limits on repos and container images
- Pricing increases significantly with user and repository scale
- Advanced features like penetration testing and VM scanning limited to higher tiers
- Device protection limited to Development environments only
- Requires multiple plan tiers for full platform coverage
ThetaRay
- Unsupervised models are harder to justify to an examiner than explicit rules, and some regulators still expect documented threshold logic, which can force you to run both systems.
- The alert reduction claim depends heavily on your data, so a parallel run is essential and adds months and cost before you can decommission the incumbent.
- Coverage is strongest in cross-border and correspondent flows; institutions whose risk is domestic retail fraud will find the fit weaker than a general-purpose monitoring platform.
- It is a smaller vendor than the incumbents, so integration connectors into legacy core banking systems are often bespoke work rather than a supported adapter.
- Model retraining and tuning are vendor-led, which means changing detection behaviour is a support conversation rather than something your own analysts can do that afternoon.
Pricing, plan by plan
Aikido
Free- DeveloperFree
- Up to 2 users
- Dependency scanning (SCA)
- SAST and AI SAST
- Pro$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Basic features
- On-premise scanning
- Advanced$600/month
- Up to 10 users
- All Pro features
- Broker for internal apps
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom pricing for tailored modules
- Dedicated account management
- Custom SLAs
ThetaRay
On request- ThetaRay Sonar$undefined/year
- Priced by monitored transaction volume and number of monitored entities
- SaaS on Azure with regional data residency options
- Parallel run and model tuning included in onboarding
Which should you pick?
Choose Aikido if
- You need static application security testing (sast).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CI/CD, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis (sca).
Questions people ask
- Is Aikido or ThetaRay better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aikido starts at Free and ThetaRay at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aikido or ThetaRay?
- Aikido has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Aikido and On request for ThetaRay.
- Does Aikido or ThetaRay run on more platforms?
- Aikido runs on Web, CI/CD, IDE. ThetaRay runs on Web.
- Can I use Aikido for free?
- Yes. Aikido has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. ThetaRay starts at On request.
- What is Aikido best used for?
- Aikido is most often used for developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows, automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts, consolidation of fragmented security tools across development lifecycle, cloud infrastructure security posture monitoring. Of those, developer-friendly security integrated into pr workflows and automated vulnerability remediation with context-aware alerts are not what ThetaRay is typically brought in for.
- What can Aikido do that ThetaRay cannot?
- Aikido covers Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), AutoFix, Secrets detection. ThetaRay covers Unsupervised detection, Cross-border focus, Sanctions screening, Alert triage.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aikido: What is included in Aikido's free Developer plan?
The free Developer plan includes up to 2 users with SAST, SCA, secrets detection, cloud scanning, and license risk detection. Fair-usage limits apply: 10 repos, 2 container images, 1 domain, and 1 cloud account.
SourceThetaRay: Does it replace a rules engine entirely?
Rarely on day one. Most institutions run it alongside existing rules during a parallel period, and some keep specific regulator-mandated rules permanently.
Aikido: What is AutoFix and how does it work?
AutoFix is Aikido's automated vulnerability remediation feature that identifies vulnerabilities and suggests or applies specific code fixes automatically, reducing manual remediation effort.
SourceThetaRay: Where is the data processed?
SaaS runs on Microsoft Azure with regional deployment options, which is the mechanism for meeting data residency conditions in regulated markets.
Aikido: How many false positives does Aikido reduce?
Aikido reduces false positives by 99%, using AI-powered context awareness to filter noise and focus on vulnerabilities that present real business risk.
SourceThetaRay: Is sanctions screening included?
Screening is available on the same platform but licensed as part of the commercial package rather than bundled by default. Confirm it is in your quote.
Aikido: What integrations does Aikido support?
Aikido integrates with Jira, Linear, Slack, Teams, GitHub, GitLab, and other popular development tools to fit into existing workflows.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Aikido vs Snyk
- Aikido vs Veracode
- Aikido vs Tenable
- Aikido vs Legit Security
- Aikido vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Aikido vs Qualys VMDR
- Aikido vs Arnica
- Aikido vs Sysdig
- Aikido vs Akeyless
- Aikido vs Infisical
- Aikido vs Tanium
- Aikido vs Doppler
- Aikido vs Passbolt
- Aikido vs Ping Identity
- Aikido vs Proofpoint
- Aikido vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Aikido vs Recorded Future
- Aikido vs Feedzai
- Aikido vs Unit21
- Aikido vs Quantexa
- Aikido vs Silent Eight
- Aikido vs NICE Actimize
- Aikido vs Sardine
- Aikido vs Fenergo
- Aikido vs Jumio
- Aikido vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Aikido vs Sumsub
- Aikido vs iDenfy
- Aikido vs Shufti Pro
- Aikido vs VMware Carbon Black
- Aikido vs Wireshark
- Aikido vs WorkOS
- Aikido vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Aikido vs Milestone XProtect
- Aikido vs Osano
- ThetaRay vs Snyk
- ThetaRay vs Veracode
- ThetaRay vs Tenable
- ThetaRay vs Legit Security
- ThetaRay vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- ThetaRay vs Qualys VMDR
- ThetaRay vs Arnica
- ThetaRay vs Sysdig
- ThetaRay vs Akeyless
- ThetaRay vs Infisical
- ThetaRay vs Tanium
- ThetaRay vs Doppler
- ThetaRay vs Passbolt
- ThetaRay vs Ping Identity
- ThetaRay vs Proofpoint
- ThetaRay vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- ThetaRay vs Recorded Future
- ThetaRay vs Feedzai
- ThetaRay vs Unit21
- ThetaRay vs Quantexa
- ThetaRay vs Silent Eight
- ThetaRay vs NICE Actimize
- ThetaRay vs Sardine
- ThetaRay vs Fenergo
- ThetaRay vs Jumio
- ThetaRay vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- ThetaRay vs Sumsub
- ThetaRay vs iDenfy
- ThetaRay vs Shufti Pro
- ThetaRay vs VMware Carbon Black
- ThetaRay vs Wireshark
- ThetaRay vs WorkOS
- ThetaRay vs Zscaler Internet Access
- ThetaRay vs Milestone XProtect
- ThetaRay vs Osano
