Cybersecurity · head to head
Acunetix vs Fenergo

Acunetix
Cybersecurity
Web application security testing made easy
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Fenergo
Cybersecurity
Client lifecycle management and KYC onboarding for regulated financial institutions
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Acunetix pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online; Fenergo implementations commonly run twelve to twenty-four months and depend on a systems integrator, so the services cost frequently exceeds the software subscription in year one.
- They diverge on capability: Acunetix covers DAST scanning, Fenergo covers Regulatory rules library.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Acunetix and Fenergo actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Acunetix
- DAST scanning
- IAST technology
- AcuSensor
- JavaScript security
- SQL injection testing
- XSS detection
- OWASP Top 10
- API security testing
Only in Fenergo
- Regulatory rules library
- Digital onboarding
- Perpetual KYC
- Entity data model
- Screening orchestration
- Case management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Acunetix
- Scanning web applications for security vulnerabilitiesnot Fenergo
- Testing APIs for exploitable weaknesses and threatsnot Fenergo
- Automating dynamic application security testing (DAST)not Fenergo
- Finding and validating security issues in production environmentsnot Fenergo
Fenergo
- A bank operating in twenty jurisdictions that cannot keep local KYC requirements current across separate regional teamsnot Acunetix
- A custodian moving from calendar-based periodic review to event-driven perpetual KYC to cut analyst headcountnot Acunetix
- An asset manager onboarding funds and trusts where the ownership hierarchy defeats generic identity verification toolsnot Acunetix
- A payments institution facing a regulatory remediation order and needing a defensible audit trail of every client reviewnot Acunetix
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Acunetix
- Pricing available by quote only; no transparent pricing published online
- Requires per-application licenses for comprehensive coverage
- Scanning speed and feature depth depend on subscription tier
- Advanced features like API security testing may require higher-tier plans
Fenergo
- Implementations commonly run twelve to twenty-four months and depend on a systems integrator, so the services cost frequently exceeds the software subscription in year one.
- It orchestrates screening but does not supply the sanctions, PEP or adverse media data, so you still buy Dow Jones, LexisNexis or World-Check separately and those fees are per screened entity.
- The entry price is set for institutions with large onboarding volumes, which puts it out of reach of smaller banks and fintechs that would otherwise benefit from the rules library.
- Configuration is deep and specific, which makes upgrades between major versions a project rather than a patch, and some customers stay on old releases for years.
- The rules library covers regulatory requirements, not your internal risk appetite, so the policy tuning that determines whether onboarding actually gets faster remains your work.
Pricing, plan by plan
Acunetix
On request- StandardFree
- Single user
- 5 targets
- Scheduled scans
- PremiumFree
- Multiple users
- Unlimited targets
- CI/CD integration
- Acunetix 360Free
- Enterprise features
- SDLC integration
- Custom workflows
Fenergo
On request- Fenergo Client Lifecycle Management$undefined/year
- Priced by institution size, jurisdictions in scope and modules licensed
- Regulatory rules content subscription bundled into the annual fee
- Implementation delivered by Fenergo or a systems integrator and quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Acunetix if
- You need dast scanning.
- You work on Desktop, Web, Api.
- You also want iast technology.
Questions people ask
- Is Acunetix or Fenergo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Acunetix starts at On request and Fenergo at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Acunetix or Fenergo?
- Acunetix starts at On request and Fenergo at On request.
- Does Acunetix or Fenergo run on more platforms?
- Acunetix runs on Desktop, Web, Api. Fenergo runs on Web.
- What is Acunetix best used for?
- Acunetix is most often used for scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities, testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats, automating dynamic application security testing (dast), finding and validating security issues in production environments. Of those, scanning web applications for security vulnerabilities and testing apis for exploitable weaknesses and threats are not what Fenergo is typically brought in for.
- What can Acunetix do that Fenergo cannot?
- Acunetix covers DAST scanning, IAST technology, AcuSensor, JavaScript security. Fenergo covers Regulatory rules library, Digital onboarding, Perpetual KYC, Entity data model.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Acunetix: How much does Invicti (formerly Acunetix) cost?
Invicti pricing is available by quote based on your organization's needs, application count, and required features. The platform offers 8x faster scanning compared to competitors and detects 99.98% of exploitable vulnerabilities. Contact Invicti sales for a custom pricing proposal.
SourceFenergo: Does Fenergo do the sanctions screening itself?
No. It orchestrates calls to third-party data providers such as Dow Jones and World-Check, and those subscriptions are additional and usually charged per screened entity.
Fenergo: Is it SaaS or on-premises?
Both. The SaaS offering runs on Microsoft Azure with regional deployment options, which matters where data residency rules prohibit client data leaving the jurisdiction.
Fenergo: How long does a deployment take?
Plan for a year at minimum for a multi-jurisdiction rollout. Single-jurisdiction deployments with a narrow product set can be shorter but rarely under six months.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Acunetix vs Norton 360
- Acunetix vs 1Password
- Acunetix vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Acunetix vs LastPass
- Acunetix vs Burp Suite
- Acunetix vs Veracode
- Acunetix vs Nessus
- Acunetix vs OWASP ZAP
- Acunetix vs Arnica
- Acunetix vs Doppler
- Acunetix vs Aikido
- Acunetix vs NordPass
- Acunetix vs One Identity
- Acunetix vs Ory Kratos
- Acunetix vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Acunetix vs Tenable Nessus
- Acunetix vs Veriff
- Acunetix vs Trulioo
- Acunetix vs NICE Actimize
- Acunetix vs Jumio
- Acunetix vs Quantexa
- Acunetix vs iDenfy
- Acunetix vs Sumsub
- Acunetix vs Shufti Pro
- Acunetix vs ThetaRay
- Acunetix vs IDnow
- Acunetix vs Feedzai
- Acunetix vs Unit21
- Acunetix vs Passbolt
- Acunetix vs Ping Identity
- Acunetix vs Proofpoint
- Acunetix vs Qualys VMDR
- Acunetix vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Fenergo vs Norton 360
- Fenergo vs 1Password
- Fenergo vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Fenergo vs LastPass
- Fenergo vs Burp Suite
- Fenergo vs Veracode
- Fenergo vs Nessus
- Fenergo vs OWASP ZAP
- Fenergo vs Arnica
- Fenergo vs Doppler
- Fenergo vs Aikido
- Fenergo vs NordPass
- Fenergo vs One Identity
- Fenergo vs Ory Kratos
- Fenergo vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Fenergo vs Tenable Nessus
- Fenergo vs Veriff
- Fenergo vs Trulioo
- Fenergo vs NICE Actimize
- Fenergo vs Jumio
- Fenergo vs Quantexa
- Fenergo vs iDenfy
- Fenergo vs Sumsub
- Fenergo vs Shufti Pro
- Fenergo vs ThetaRay
- Fenergo vs IDnow
- Fenergo vs Feedzai
- Fenergo vs Unit21
- Fenergo vs Passbolt
- Fenergo vs Ping Identity
- Fenergo vs Proofpoint
- Fenergo vs Qualys VMDR
- Fenergo vs Rapid7 InsightVM
