Softwr

Marketing & Analytics · head to head

AB Tasty vs Rocket.Chat

AB Tasty logo

AB Tasty

Marketing & Analytics

Conversion optimization platform

From
€500/month
Rated
-
Rocket.Chat logo

Rocket.Chat

Communication & Collaboration

Deployment flexibility and compliance across regulatory frameworks

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: AB Tasty pricing is not published and requires a demo or a sales conversation; Rocket.Chat no prices, tier names with numbers, or minimum seats are published anywhere on the pricing page; all three paid editions (Commercial, Government, Defense) route to Contact sales or Contact us

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which AB Tasty and Rocket.Chat actually diverge.

Attributes where AB Tasty and Rocket.Chat differ
AttributeAB TastyRocket.Chat
Starting price€500/monthOn request
CategoryMarketing & AnalyticsCommunication & Collaboration
Founded2011Unknown

Identical on both: pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in AB Tasty

  • A/B testing
  • Multivariate testing
  • Personalization
  • Visual editor
  • Google Analytics
  • Salesforce
  • SSL encryption
  • Cloud deployment

Only in Rocket.Chat

Nothing recorded that AB Tasty does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

AB Tasty

  • A/B and multivariate testing on web and mobilenot Rocket.Chat
  • Feature flagging and progressive rolloutsnot Rocket.Chat
  • Personalising content for identified and anonymous visitorsnot Rocket.Chat
  • Search, recommendations and merchandising for ecommercenot Rocket.Chat
  • Conversion optimisation experiments across channelsnot Rocket.Chat

Rocket.Chat

No use cases recorded yet. See the Rocket.Chat review.

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

AB Tasty

  • Pricing is not published and requires a demo or a sales conversation

Rocket.Chat

  • No prices, tier names with numbers, or minimum seats are published anywhere on the pricing page; all three paid editions (Commercial, Government, Defense) route to Contact sales or Contact us
  • The free community edition is not represented on the pricing page at all, which lists only the three quote-only enterprise tiers

Pricing, plan by plan

AB Tasty

€500/month
  • Standard$500/month
    • A/B testing
    • Basic personalization
    • Analytics

Rocket.Chat

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Rocket.Chat review.

Which should you pick?

Choose AB Tasty if

  • You need a/b testing.
  • You also want multivariate testing.

Choose Rocket.Chat if

Nothing in the data separates Rocket.Chat from AB Tasty on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

Questions people ask

Is AB Tasty or Rocket.Chat better?
Neither clearly leads. AB Tasty starts at €500/month and Rocket.Chat at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, AB Tasty or Rocket.Chat?
AB Tasty starts at €500/month and Rocket.Chat at On request.
Does AB Tasty or Rocket.Chat run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is AB Tasty best used for?
AB Tasty is most often used for a/b and multivariate testing on web and mobile, feature flagging and progressive rollouts, personalising content for identified and anonymous visitors, search, recommendations and merchandising for ecommerce. Of those, a/b and multivariate testing on web and mobile and feature flagging and progressive rollouts are not what Rocket.Chat is typically brought in for.
What can AB Tasty do that Rocket.Chat cannot?
AB Tasty covers A/B testing, Multivariate testing, Personalization, Visual editor.

Related pages

Other head to heads