Softwr

Marketing & Analytics · head to head

AB Tasty vs Quo

AB Tasty logo

AB Tasty

Marketing & Analytics

Conversion optimization platform

From
€500/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Quo logo

Quo

Communication & Collaboration

Formerly OpenPhone

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Quo has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: AB Tasty pricing is not published and requires a demo or a sales conversation; Quo unlimited calling to US and Canadian numbers is subject to a Fair Usage Policy rather than being truly unlimited

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which AB Tasty and Quo actually diverge.

Attributes where AB Tasty and Quo differ
AttributeAB TastyQuo
Starting price€500/monthFree
Pricing modelquotefreemium
Free tierNoYes
CategoryMarketing & AnalyticsCommunication & Collaboration
Founded2011Unknown

Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in AB Tasty

  • A/B testing
  • Multivariate testing
  • Personalization
  • Visual editor
  • Google Analytics
  • Salesforce
  • SSL encryption
  • Cloud deployment

Only in Quo

Nothing recorded that AB Tasty does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

AB Tasty

  • A/B and multivariate testing on web and mobilenot Quo
  • Feature flagging and progressive rolloutsnot Quo
  • Personalising content for identified and anonymous visitorsnot Quo
  • Search, recommendations and merchandising for ecommercenot Quo
  • Conversion optimisation experiments across channelsnot Quo

Quo

No use cases recorded yet. See the Quo review.

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

AB Tasty

  • Pricing is not published and requires a demo or a sales conversation

Quo

  • Unlimited calling to US and Canadian numbers is subject to a Fair Usage Policy rather than being truly unlimited
  • Starter tier's $15/user annual rate requires prepaying annually; monthly billing costs $19/user, about 27% more
  • The Sona AI agent automation credits are capped at 1,000 free per plan before additional usage is billed

Pricing, plan by plan

AB Tasty

€500/month
  • Standard$500/month
    • A/B testing
    • Basic personalization
    • Analytics

Quo

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Quo review.

Which should you pick?

Choose AB Tasty if

  • You need a/b testing.
  • You also want multivariate testing.
AB Tasty review

Choose Quo if

  • You want to start without paying.
Quo review

Questions people ask

Is AB Tasty or Quo better?
Neither clearly leads. AB Tasty starts at €500/month and Quo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, AB Tasty or Quo?
Quo has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at €500/month for AB Tasty and Free for Quo.
Does AB Tasty or Quo run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
Can I use Quo for free?
Yes. Quo has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. AB Tasty starts at €500/month.
What is AB Tasty best used for?
AB Tasty is most often used for a/b and multivariate testing on web and mobile, feature flagging and progressive rollouts, personalising content for identified and anonymous visitors, search, recommendations and merchandising for ecommerce. Of those, a/b and multivariate testing on web and mobile and feature flagging and progressive rollouts are not what Quo is typically brought in for.
What can AB Tasty do that Quo cannot?
AB Tasty covers A/B testing, Multivariate testing, Personalization, Visual editor.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on AB Tasty

More on Quo

Keep looking

Other head to heads