Marketing & Analytics · head to head
Fathom Analytics vs Quo

Fathom Analytics
Marketing & Analytics
Website analytics made simple
- From
- $14/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Quo has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Fathom Analytics there is no free tier, only a 7 day trial; Quo unlimited calling to US and Canadian numbers is subject to a Fair Usage Policy rather than being truly unlimited
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fathom Analytics and Quo actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fathom Analytics | Quo |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $14/month | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Category | Marketing & Analytics | Communication & Collaboration |
| Founded | 2014 | Unknown |
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fathom Analytics
- Page view tracking
- Goal tracking
- Real-time analytics
- Referrer tracking
- Privacy-focused
- GDPR compliant
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
Only in Quo
Nothing recorded that Fathom Analytics does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fathom Analytics
- Privacy-focused web analytics without cookie bannersnot Quo
- A lightweight Google Analytics replacementnot Quo
- Tracking many sites from one accountnot Quo
- Long-term historical reporting while subscribednot Quo
Quo
No use cases recorded yet. See the Quo review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fathom Analytics
- There is no free tier, only a 7 day trial
- Priced on pageviews, from $45 a month at the 500,000 pageview level
- Custom events count against the pageview allowance rather than being tracked separately
- Site allowances come in packs, with additional 50-site packs at $10 a month
- Data is retained forever only while the subscription is active
Quo
- Unlimited calling to US and Canadian numbers is subject to a Fair Usage Policy rather than being truly unlimited
- Starter tier's $15/user annual rate requires prepaying annually; monthly billing costs $19/user, about 27% more
- The Sona AI agent automation credits are capped at 1,000 free per plan before additional usage is billed
Pricing, plan by plan
Fathom Analytics
$14/month- Starter$14/month
- Unlimited page views
- 1 site
- Real-time analytics
Quo
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Quo review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Fathom Analytics if
- You need page view tracking.
- You also want goal tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is Fathom Analytics or Quo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fathom Analytics starts at $14/month and Quo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fathom Analytics or Quo?
- Quo has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $14/month for Fathom Analytics and Free for Quo.
- Does Fathom Analytics or Quo run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Quo for free?
- Yes. Quo has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Fathom Analytics starts at $14/month.
- What is Fathom Analytics best used for?
- Fathom Analytics is most often used for privacy-focused web analytics without cookie banners, a lightweight google analytics replacement, tracking many sites from one account, long-term historical reporting while subscribed. Of those, privacy-focused web analytics without cookie banners and a lightweight google analytics replacement are not what Quo is typically brought in for.
- What can Fathom Analytics do that Quo cannot?
- Fathom Analytics covers Page view tracking, Goal tracking, Real-time analytics, Referrer tracking.
Related pages
More on Fathom Analytics
Other head to heads
- Fathom Analytics vs Crazy Egg
- Fathom Analytics vs Ruler Analytics
- Fathom Analytics vs Northbeam
- Fathom Analytics vs VWO
- Fathom Analytics vs Attribution
- Fathom Analytics vs Countly
- Fathom Analytics vs Dreamdata
- Fathom Analytics vs Google Analytics
- Fathom Analytics vs Triple Whale
- Fathom Analytics vs AB Tasty
- Fathom Analytics vs Adobe Analytics
- Fathom Analytics vs Adverity
- Fathom Analytics vs Convert
- Fathom Analytics vs Datorama
- Fathom Analytics vs Funnel.io
- Fathom Analytics vs Google Optimize
- Fathom Analytics vs Improvado
- Fathom Analytics vs June
- Fathom Analytics vs Zoom
- Fathom Analytics vs Microsoft Teams
- Fathom Analytics vs Loom
- Fathom Analytics vs RingCentral Video
- Fathom Analytics vs Slack
- Fathom Analytics vs Telegram
- Fathom Analytics vs Webex by Cisco
- Fathom Analytics vs Chanty
- Fathom Analytics vs Chatwork
- Fathom Analytics vs Flock
- Fathom Analytics vs Google Chat
- Fathom Analytics vs Grasshopper
- Fathom Analytics vs Lark
- Fathom Analytics vs Mattermost
- Fathom Analytics vs Rocket.Chat
- Fathom Analytics vs Signal
- Fathom Analytics vs TeamViewer
- Fathom Analytics vs Textline
- Quo vs Crazy Egg
- Quo vs Ruler Analytics
- Quo vs Northbeam
- Quo vs VWO
- Quo vs Attribution
- Quo vs Countly
- Quo vs Dreamdata
- Quo vs Google Analytics
- Quo vs Triple Whale
- Quo vs AB Tasty
- Quo vs Adobe Analytics
- Quo vs Adverity
- Quo vs Convert
- Quo vs Datorama
- Quo vs Funnel.io
- Quo vs Google Optimize
- Quo vs Improvado
- Quo vs June
- Quo vs Zoom
- Quo vs Microsoft Teams
- Quo vs Loom
- Quo vs RingCentral Video
- Quo vs Slack
- Quo vs Telegram
- Quo vs Webex by Cisco
- Quo vs Chanty
- Quo vs Chatwork
- Quo vs Flock
- Quo vs Google Chat
- Quo vs Grasshopper
- Quo vs Lark
- Quo vs Mattermost
- Quo vs Rocket.Chat
- Quo vs Signal
- Quo vs TeamViewer
- Quo vs Textline

