Softwr
ReadMe logo

ReadMe

Hosted developer hub priced per API project, with docs personalised from live request logs

As of 30 August 2026, ReadMe has a free plan and paid plans start at $99/month. A documentation platform for public and partner APIs that renders OpenAPI references, guides and changelogs. Softwr lists it under Documentation. ReadMe is available on Web.

Overview

What ReadMe does

ReadMe hosts developer documentation: an API reference generated from an OpenAPI description, hand-written guides and recipes, a changelog, a support widget and an interactive request playground. Content is written in Markdown in a hosted editor or synchronised from a Git repository with the rdme command line tool, and each documentation set can be versioned alongside the API it describes. Two commercial facts sit behind the feature list. First, the pricing unit is the project, meaning one API, not the seat, so a team of three documenting one API pays the same as a team of forty, while an organisation with six separate APIs pays six times over unless it negotiates an enterprise contract. That inverts the usual calculation and rewards consolidating several services into one documented surface. Second, the metrics and personalisation features depend on your API sending request logs to ReadMe. In exchange, a logged-in developer sees their own API keys prefilled and their own recent requests next to the endpoint that failed, which measurably reduces support tickets. The cost is that production request metadata, and whatever it contains, leaves your infrastructure to a third party, which means a security review and a log-scrubbing implementation before launch. Buyers are API-first companies with an external developer audience: payments, communications, logistics and infrastructure vendors whose documentation is a sales channel. The trade-off is scope and lock-in. ReadMe is built around describing REST APIs, so it is a poor fit for long-form product manuals or internal knowledge bases, theming is bounded by the platform, and content plus its custom extensions has to be untangled from ReadMe on the way out.

What people use it for

  • Publishing a public API reference where a developer can send a live request with their own key from the documentation page
  • Cutting support load by showing an integrating developer their own recent failing requests next to the endpoint description
  • Keeping documentation versions aligned with API versions so customers on an older release read the matching reference
  • Shipping documentation from the same pull request as the code change using the rdme command line tool in CI

The honest half

Where it falls short

Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about ReadMe.

  • Pricing is per project, so an organisation with several distinct APIs multiplies the monthly bill rather than adding seats, and the sensible workaround, merging unrelated APIs into one documentation project, distorts the information architecture to fit the invoice.
  • The metrics and personalisation features require your API to stream request logs to ReadMe, which means production request metadata leaves your infrastructure and needs a scrubbing layer plus a security review before anything is switched on.
  • Single sign-on and private documentation sit on the higher tier, so a company that only needs to gate partner documentation behind SAML pays a large step up for one control.
  • The platform is built for describing REST APIs, and long-form product manuals, internal knowledge bases or non-OpenAPI protocols fit it badly, so most customers end up running a second documentation tool alongside it.
  • Theming is bounded by ReadMe templates and limited custom CSS, so a documentation site that must match a strongly designed marketing site will not get there without compromise.
  • Content uses ReadMe-specific Markdown extensions and platform features, so migrating away is an export plus a rewrite rather than moving a folder of Markdown files.

Cross-shopped

What people choose instead of ReadMe

Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.

  • ReadMe logo
    ReadMe
    vs
    Redocly logo
    Redocly

    Redocly: If you want OpenAPI reference documentation from a docs-as-code pipeline you control, with self-hosted output

  • ReadMe logo
    ReadMe
    vs
    GitBook logo
    GitBook

    GitBook: If you need product documentation and knowledge base content as much as an API reference

  • ReadMe logo
    ReadMe
    vs
    MkDocs logo
    MkDocs

    MkDocs: If the documentation should be a static site you build and host yourself with no per-project fee

Pricing

What ReadMe costs

Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.

Free

Free

  • One project on a ReadMe subdomain
  • OpenAPI reference and guides
  • Basic editing and publishing

Startup

$99 /mo

  • One project
  • Custom domain
  • API metrics from request logs
  • Documentation versioning

Business

$399 /mo

  • One project
  • SAML single sign-on
  • Private and partner-only documentation
  • Staging before publish

Enterprise

On request

  • Multiple projects under one contract
  • Negotiated support and uptime terms
  • Security review and custom deployment questions
  • Pricing on application

Capabilities

Features

  • OpenAPI reference

    Generates the endpoint reference from an uploaded or synchronised OpenAPI description

  • Try It playground

    Sends real requests from the documentation page, prefilled with the reader API key where available

  • API metrics

    Charts real traffic, error rates and endpoint use from request logs your API sends to ReadMe

  • Personalised docs

    Shows a logged-in developer their own keys and recent request history alongside the reference

  • Versioning

    Maintains parallel documentation versions matched to API versions, with a stable and a beta branch

  • Guides and recipes

    Long-form Markdown pages and step-through tutorials that sit beside the generated reference

  • Git sync via rdme

    Pushes Markdown and OpenAPI files from a repository so documentation ships with the code

  • Changelog and support widget

    Dated release notes and an in-page support entry point tied to the documentation

Answered, with sources

Questions people ask

Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.

Is ReadMe priced per user?

No. It is priced per project, meaning per documented API. Team size does not change the bill, and a second API generally does.

Do I have to send my API logs to ReadMe?

Only for metrics and personalised documentation. The reference, guides and playground work without it, but the features that most distinguish the product are the ones that need the log stream.

Can I keep documentation in Git?

Yes. The rdme command line tool synchronises Markdown and OpenAPI files from a repository, so documentation can ship in the same pull request as the code.

Can I self-host it?

No. ReadMe is a hosted product only, so buyers with a hard on-premises requirement need a different platform.

Share

Keep looking

Where to go from ReadMe

Best Documentation software for

Compare ReadMe with

Other Documentation software

  • API documentation and OpenAPI governance platform

    10 researched notes
  • Hosted documentation platform for product and developer docs with a block editor and AI answers

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Static site generator for project documentation in Markdown

    Open source8 researched notes
  • Hosted documentation platform with Git synchronisation

    Free plan10 researched notes
  • Open source API reference renderer and request client generated entirely from an OpenAPI document

    Open source13 researched notes
  • Hosted API documentation that diffs each new spec against the last and publishes a human readable changelog

    Pricing on request13 researched notes
  • Free, open source documentation generator that builds reference docs from source code comments

    Open source11 researched notes
  • Documentation framework for Next.js that treats the docs site as an application rather than a static export

    Open source13 researched notes
  • Component content management system for technical documentation, licensed per author seat

    11 researched notes
  • Self-service help centre software priced by number of editors, not by readers

    11 researched notes
  • Fast team wiki with list, board and graph views of the same content

    Free, then $6/mo11 researched notes
  • Documentation generator built for large technical projects

    Open source9 researched notes
  • Structured and unstructured authoring for long, complex technical documents, subscription-only

    11 researched notes
  • Static site generator that assembles versioned AsciiDoc documentation from many git repositories

    Open source12 researched notes
  • Documentation site generator that renders markdown in the browser with no build step and no generated HTML

    Open source12 researched notes
  • Hosted documentation platform for product and developer docs with a block editor and AI answers

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Hosted API documentation that diffs each new spec against the last and publishes a human readable changelog

    Pricing on request13 researched notes
  • Documentation generator built for large technical projects

    Open source9 researched notes

Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for ReadMe, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.

More on ReadMe

Best Documentation software alternatives

Self-service help centre software priced by number of editors, not by readers

Per editor seat per month

Turns a screen recording into a narrated step by step how to video and document

Per creator per month

Single-source technical authoring tool sold as a per-author annual subscription

Per author per year, annual subscription only

Component content management system for technical documentation, licensed per author seat

Per author seat per year

Long-standing help authoring tool, now sold as an Adobe subscription rather than a perpetual licence

Per user per month, annual commitment

Free, open source documentation generator that builds reference docs from source code comments

Open source, no licence fee

Team knowledge base under the Business Source Licence, self-hostable or vendor hosted

Free to self-host, per user per month when hosted by the vendor

Structured and unstructured authoring for long, complex technical documents, subscription-only

Per user per month

Compare ReadMe with alternatives