Documentation · head to head
Outline vs ReadMe

Outline
Documentation
Team knowledge base under the Business Source Licence, self-hostable or vendor hosted
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

ReadMe
Documentation
Hosted developer hub priced per API project, with docs personalised from live request logs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Outline the Business Source Licence is not an open source licence, so anyone planning to host Outline for clients, resell it or embed it in a commercial service is prohibited until the per-release change date passes, and this is regularly discovered only at legal review.; ReadMe pricing is per project, so an organisation with several distinct APIs multiplies the monthly bill rather than adding seats, and the sensible workaround, merging unrelated APIs into one documentation project, distorts the information architecture to fit the invoice.
- They diverge on capability: Outline covers Structured collections, ReadMe covers OpenAPI reference.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Outline and ReadMe actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Documentation).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Outline
- Structured collections
- Block editor
- Search
- Backlinks and mentions
- Templates
- API and webhooks
- Single sign-on
- Self-hosting
Only in ReadMe
- OpenAPI reference
- Try It playground
- API metrics
- Personalised docs
- Versioning
- Guides and recipes
- Git sync via rdme
- Changelog and support widget
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Outline
- Running an internal wiki on your own infrastructure when documentation cannot leave a specific jurisdictionnot ReadMe
- Replacing a general-purpose workspace tool with something narrower where search speed and writing flow matter mostnot ReadMe
- Keeping engineering decision records and postmortems in templated documents that link to each other automaticallynot ReadMe
- Giving a company already standardised on Google or Okta a wiki that inherits identity and group membership directlynot ReadMe
ReadMe
- Publishing a public API reference where a developer can send a live request with their own key from the documentation pagenot Outline
- Cutting support load by showing an integrating developer their own recent failing requests next to the endpoint descriptionnot Outline
- Keeping documentation versions aligned with API versions so customers on an older release read the matching referencenot Outline
- Shipping documentation from the same pull request as the code change using the rdme command line tool in CInot Outline
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Outline
- The Business Source Licence is not an open source licence, so anyone planning to host Outline for clients, resell it or embed it in a commercial service is prohibited until the per-release change date passes, and this is regularly discovered only at legal review.
- There is no local password authentication, so self-hosting requires an identity provider to be in place first, which turns a small internal wiki into a project with a dependency on Google, Okta, Entra or a Keycloak instance somebody has to run.
- Self-hosting needs Postgres, Redis and S3-compatible object storage together, so the operational footprint is larger than the single database most internal wikis require.
- The hosted plans offer no customer-selectable hosting region, so buyers with data residency obligations are pushed to self-hosting even when they would have paid to avoid running servers.
- It is built for internal knowledge rather than public documentation, with no versioned documentation sets, no static output and limited public publishing, so it will not serve as a product documentation site.
- Because it is a single-vendor project rather than a foundation-governed one, a future licence or pricing change applies to new releases and the only defence is staying on an older version.
ReadMe
- Pricing is per project, so an organisation with several distinct APIs multiplies the monthly bill rather than adding seats, and the sensible workaround, merging unrelated APIs into one documentation project, distorts the information architecture to fit the invoice.
- The metrics and personalisation features require your API to stream request logs to ReadMe, which means production request metadata leaves your infrastructure and needs a scrubbing layer plus a security review before anything is switched on.
- Single sign-on and private documentation sit on the higher tier, so a company that only needs to gate partner documentation behind SAML pays a large step up for one control.
- The platform is built for describing REST APIs, and long-form product manuals, internal knowledge bases or non-OpenAPI protocols fit it badly, so most customers end up running a second documentation tool alongside it.
- Theming is bounded by ReadMe templates and limited custom CSS, so a documentation site that must match a strongly designed marketing site will not get there without compromise.
- Content uses ReadMe-specific Markdown extensions and platform features, so migrating away is an export plus a rewrite rather than moving a folder of Markdown files.
Pricing, plan by plan
Outline
Free- Self-hostedFree
- Source available under the Business Source Licence
- No licence fee for use inside your own organisation
- Requires Postgres, Redis and S3-compatible storage
- Team (hosted)$undefined/month
- Charged per user per month
- Hosted and maintained by the vendor
- Single sign-on through Google, Slack or Microsoft
- Enterprise (hosted)$undefined/month
- SAML single sign-on and provisioning
- Administrative controls and audit visibility
- Negotiated terms and support
ReadMe
Free- FreeFree
- One project on a ReadMe subdomain
- OpenAPI reference and guides
- Basic editing and publishing
- Startup$99/month
- One project
- Custom domain
- API metrics from request logs
- Business$399/month
- One project
- SAML single sign-on
- Private and partner-only documentation
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Multiple projects under one contract
- Negotiated support and uptime terms
- Security review and custom deployment questions
Which should you pick?
Choose Outline if
- You need structured collections.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted, Docker, iOS, Android.
- You also want block editor.
Choose ReadMe if
- You need openapi reference.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want try it playground.
Questions people ask
- Is Outline or ReadMe better?
- Neither clearly leads. Outline starts at Free and ReadMe at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Outline or ReadMe?
- Outline starts at Free and ReadMe at Free.
- Does Outline or ReadMe run on more platforms?
- Outline runs on Web, Self-hosted, Docker, iOS, Android. ReadMe runs on Web.
- Can I use Outline for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Outline best used for?
- Outline is most often used for running an internal wiki on your own infrastructure when documentation cannot leave a specific jurisdiction, replacing a general-purpose workspace tool with something narrower where search speed and writing flow matter most, keeping engineering decision records and postmortems in templated documents that link to each other automatically, giving a company already standardised on google or okta a wiki that inherits identity and group membership directly. Of those, running an internal wiki on your own infrastructure when documentation cannot leave a specific jurisdiction and replacing a general-purpose workspace tool with something narrower where search speed and writing flow matter most are not what ReadMe is typically brought in for.
- What can Outline do that ReadMe cannot?
- Outline covers Structured collections, Block editor, Search, Backlinks and mentions. ReadMe covers OpenAPI reference, Try It playground, API metrics, Personalised docs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Outline: Is Outline open source?
No, not in the OSI sense. It is source available under the Business Source Licence, which permits internal use and self-hosting but not offering it as a service to others, with each release converting to an open source licence after its change date.
ReadMe: Is ReadMe priced per user?
No. It is priced per project, meaning per documented API. Team size does not change the bill, and a second API generally does.
Outline: Can I run it for free?
Yes, for your own organisation. Self-hosting carries no licence fee, only the cost of running Postgres, Redis, object storage and an identity provider.
ReadMe: Do I have to send my API logs to ReadMe?
Only for metrics and personalised documentation. The reference, guides and playground work without it, but the features that most distinguish the product are the ones that need the log stream.
Outline: Can I choose where the hosted version stores data?
No. The hosted plans do not offer a region choice, so residency requirements mean self-hosting.
ReadMe: Can I keep documentation in Git?
Yes. The rdme command line tool synchronises Markdown and OpenAPI files from a repository, so documentation can ship in the same pull request as the code.
Outline: Does it work for public product documentation?
Poorly. It has no versioned documentation sets or static site output, so it is best kept for internal knowledge.
ReadMe: Can I self-host it?
No. ReadMe is a hosted product only, so buyers with a hard on-premises requirement need a different platform.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Outline vs Nuclino
- Outline vs Slab
- Outline vs GitBook
- Outline vs MkDocs
- Outline vs BookStack
- Outline vs HelpDocs
- Outline vs Archbee
- Outline vs Guidde
- Outline vs Read the Docs
- Outline vs Adobe RoboHelp
- Outline vs Doxygen
- Outline vs Bump.sh
- Outline vs Docsify
- Outline vs Fumadocs
- Outline vs Scalar
- Outline vs Starlight
- Outline vs Adobe FrameMaker
- Outline vs Redocly
- Outline vs Paligo
- Outline vs Sphinx
- Outline vs Antora
- ReadMe vs Nuclino
- ReadMe vs Slab
- ReadMe vs GitBook
- ReadMe vs MkDocs
- ReadMe vs BookStack
- ReadMe vs HelpDocs
- ReadMe vs Archbee
- ReadMe vs Guidde
- ReadMe vs Read the Docs
- ReadMe vs Adobe RoboHelp
- ReadMe vs Doxygen
- ReadMe vs Bump.sh
- ReadMe vs Docsify
- ReadMe vs Fumadocs
- ReadMe vs Scalar
- ReadMe vs Starlight
- ReadMe vs Adobe FrameMaker
- ReadMe vs Redocly
- ReadMe vs Paligo
- ReadMe vs Sphinx
- ReadMe vs Antora
