Softwr
LucidLink logo

LucidLink

Cloud filesystem that streams large media files on demand instead of syncing them

As of 1 September 2026, LucidLink starts at $7/month. Mounts object storage as a local drive and streams only the blocks you actually read, so editors open a 4K timeline without downloading the footage. Softwr lists it under File Storage. LucidLink is available on macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS.

Overview

What LucidLink does

LucidLink presents cloud object storage as a mounted filesystem. Rather than syncing whole files the way Dropbox does, it fetches only the byte ranges an application requests and caches them locally, which is why a video editor can scrub a multi-terabyte timeline over a normal internet connection. Data is encrypted client side, and on the Enterprise tier customers can hold their own keys so the vendor cannot read the content. The commercial distinction is the pricing shape. Starter is $7 per member per month including 100GB, with additional storage at $7 per 100GB per month. Business is $32 per member per month, or $27 billed annually, including 400GB per member with additional storage at $8 per 100GB. Storage is pooled across the team, so five Starter members share 500GB before overage starts. That per-100GB rate works out far above raw object storage prices, which is the trade the product makes: you are paying for the filestreaming layer, not for capacity. Buyers are post-production houses, broadcasters, game studios and architecture practices with distributed teams working on files too large to sync. The trade-off is that it is a network filesystem, so performance depends on the link, and small-file workloads such as source code repositories or software build trees behave badly on it.

What people use it for

  • A post house with editors in three countries cutting from one shared 4K rush library without shipping drives
  • A broadcaster giving freelancers access to a project for a fortnight without provisioning VPN and a NAS mount
  • A game studio sharing multi-gigabyte asset builds where syncing every file to every workstation is impractical
  • An architecture practice opening large point cloud and BIM files from a laptop on a hotel connection

The honest half

Where it falls short

Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about LucidLink.

  • Additional storage at $7 to $8 per 100GB per month is roughly three to four times raw S3 pricing, so teams with large cold archives pay a heavy premium for data they rarely touch.
  • Included storage is pooled per member, so adding a seat is also how you buy capacity, and teams with a few heavy users and many light ones buy seats purely for the gigabytes.
  • Performance is bounded by the network link and local cache size, so a workstation with a small cache on a poor connection performs far worse than the demonstrations suggest.
  • Small-file and metadata-heavy workloads such as code repositories, node modules trees or build outputs perform badly, so it is not a general-purpose file server replacement.
  • Customer-managed keys and bring your own storage are Enterprise-tier options, so organisations that cannot let a vendor hold their keys cannot use the published pricing at all.

Cross-shopped

What people choose instead of LucidLink

Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.

  • LucidLink logo
    LucidLink
    vs
    Dropbox logo
    Dropbox

    Dropbox: Cheaper and simpler when files are small enough to sync and you do not need on-demand streaming

  • LucidLink logo
    LucidLink
    vs
    Nasuni logo
    Nasuni

    Nasuni: Enterprise cloud file services with global file locking, aimed at general corporate file shares rather than media

  • LucidLink logo
    LucidLink
    vs
    Egnyte logo
    Egnyte

    Egnyte: Better fit for governance-heavy corporate file collaboration rather than large media workflows

Pricing

What LucidLink costs

Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.

Starter

$7 /mo

  • 100GB included per member, pooled across the team
  • Additional storage $7 per 100GB per month
  • Client-side encryption
  • Suited to small projects and teams getting started

Business

$32 /mo

  • $27 per member per month billed annually
  • 400GB included per member, pooled across the team
  • Additional storage $8 per 100GB per month
  • 30-day free trial and AWS Marketplace purchasing
  • Shared projects of any size

Enterprise

On request

  • Custom pricing and storage terms
  • Customer-managed encryption keys
  • Bring your own object storage bucket
  • Dedicated support and custom SLAs

Capabilities

Features

  • Filespaces

    Object storage presented as a mounted drive on macOS, Windows and Linux

  • On-demand streaming

    Fetches only the byte ranges requested rather than downloading whole files

  • Client-side encryption

    Data encrypted before it leaves the workstation

  • Customer-managed keys

    Enterprise tier option where the customer holds the encryption keys rather than LucidLink

  • Bring your own storage

    Enterprise deployments can point at the customer own S3 or Azure bucket

  • Snapshots

    Point-in-time filespace snapshots for rollback after accidental deletion

Answered, with sources

Questions people ask

Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.

What does storage actually cost?

$7 per 100GB per month on Starter and $8 per 100GB per month on Business, above the pooled allowance. Model this separately from the seat cost.

Can we hold our own encryption keys?

On the Enterprise tier, yes, along with pointing the filespace at your own S3 or Azure bucket. Not on Starter or Business.

Does it work for source code?

Not well. It is built for large sequential reads. Many small files is the workload it handles worst.

Share

Keep looking

Where to go from LucidLink

Best File Storage software for

Compare LucidLink with

Other File Storage software

  • Cloud file storage that keeps the authoritative copy in object storage and caches it at each site

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Global file system putting one namespace over object storage across sites

    Pricing on request11 researched notes
  • Open source distributed storage providing object, block and file from one cluster

    Open source12 researched notes
  • Open-source ZFS storage operating system for network-attached storage

    Free plan12 researched notes
  • Google's consumer cloud storage app, sharing the same 15GB quota as Gmail and Google Photos

    Free plan10 researched notes
  • Self-hosted file sync, sharing and collaboration platform

    Free plan12 researched notes
  • S3-compatible object storage that charges nothing for egress to the internet

    Free, then $0.015/mo12 researched notes
  • Free open-source backup with encryption

    Free plan10 researched notes
  • S3-compatible on-premises object storage with object lock immutability

    Pricing on request11 researched notes
  • Petabyte-scale object storage software on your own hardware

    Pricing on request11 researched notes
  • Globally distributed S3-compatible object storage with zero egress fees

    Free, then $0.004/GB/month10 researched notes
  • Store, sync, and share sensitive files with end-to-end encryption and zero-knowledge

    Free plan10 researched notes
  • Affordable online backup with multiple device support

    From $2.5/mo11 researched notes
  • Cloud storage that comes with Microsoft 365

    From $1.99/mo10 researched notes
  • Continuous data protection with near-zero RPO

    From $5/mo6 researched notes
  • Google's consumer cloud storage app, sharing the same 15GB quota as Gmail and Google Photos

    Free plan10 researched notes
  • Self-hosted file sync, sharing and collaboration platform

    Free plan12 researched notes
  • S3-compatible on-premises object storage with object lock immutability

    Pricing on request11 researched notes

Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for LucidLink, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.

More on LucidLink

Best File Storage software alternatives

Petabyte-scale object storage software on your own hardware

quote

Global file system putting one namespace over object storage across sites

quote

All-flash storage designed to make hard disk tiers unnecessary

quote

Google's consumer cloud storage app, sharing the same 15GB quota as Gmail and Google Photos

Free tier plus paid storage add-on

S3-compatible on-premises object storage with object lock immutability

quote

S3-compatible object storage server you run yourself, now under AGPL with a stripped community edition

Open source, no licence fee

Open source distributed storage providing object, block and file from one cluster

Open source, no licence fee

Compare LucidLink with alternatives