Cephvs
MinIO


MinIO: Far simpler to operate if you only need an S3 endpoint and not block or file storage

Open source distributed storage providing object, block and file from one cluster
As of 31 August 2026, Ceph is free to use. One cluster that serves S3 objects, block devices and a POSIX filesystem from the same pool of disks, with no single point of failure and no licence fee. Softwr lists it under File Storage. Ceph is made by Ceph Foundation (Linux Foundation), available on Linux.
Overview
Ceph is an open source distributed storage system built on RADOS, a self healing object store that places data by algorithm rather than by lookup table. On top of it sit three interfaces: RADOS Gateway for S3 and Swift object access, RBD for block devices used by OpenStack and Proxmox, and CephFS for a POSIX filesystem. It is governed by the Ceph Foundation under the Linux Foundation, with IBM as the largest contributor following its acquisition of Red Hat. The reason to choose it is that it is the only mature open system that serves all three storage types from one pool. A platform team can back virtual machine disks, a shared filesystem and an S3 endpoint with the same hardware and one operational skill set, and grow it by adding nodes rather than by buying the next array. Commercially that means no per terabyte licence and no vendor lock on the hardware, which is why it underpins so much of the OpenStack and research computing world. Buyers are organisations with a platform team and a multi petabyte horizon: universities, telecoms, hosting providers and anyone running private cloud at scale. The trade-off is staffing. Ceph rewards operators who understand placement groups, CRUSH maps, recovery throttling and upgrade ordering, and it punishes those who do not with recovery storms that make the whole cluster slow at exactly the moment something has already failed.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Ceph.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


MinIO: Far simpler to operate if you only need an S3 endpoint and not block or file storage


Proxmox VE: Bundles Ceph with a hypervisor and a management UI, which removes much of the initial setup work


Backblaze: If the aim was cheap durable object storage rather than a private platform, a managed bucket avoids the staffing cost entirely
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Ceph
Free
Capabilities
RADOS object store
Self healing, self managing distributed object layer underneath every interface
RADOS Gateway
S3 and Swift compatible object access with multi site replication
RBD block devices
Thin provisioned block volumes with snapshots for virtual machines and containers
CephFS
A POSIX filesystem with a scalable metadata server tier
CRUSH placement
Algorithmic data placement across failure domains without a central metadata lookup
Erasure coded pools
Reduces raw capacity overhead compared with three way replication on cold data
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
Three is the practical minimum for a replicated cluster with real fault tolerance, and most production advice starts at five once you account for maintenance windows.
Not on single stream latency. It wins on aggregate throughput and on growing without a forklift upgrade, which is a different property from raw speed.
Yes. IBM sells IBM Storage Ceph and SUSE and others have offered supported builds; the upstream project itself is free.
If object is all you need, a dedicated object store is simpler to run. Ceph earns its complexity when you need block and file as well.
Keep looking
S3-compatible object storage server you run yourself, now under AGPL with a stripped community edition
Global file system putting one namespace over object storage across sites
Petabyte-scale object storage software on your own hardware
All-flash storage designed to make hard disk tiers unnecessary
S3-compatible object storage distributed in encrypted pieces across independently operated nodes
Globally distributed S3-compatible object storage with zero egress fees
S3-compatible object storage that charges nothing for egress to the internet
S3-compatible on-premises object storage with object lock immutability
Low cost S3-compatible object storage with egress included up to a multiple of what you store
Open-source ZFS storage operating system for network-attached storage
Cloud filesystem that streams large media files on demand instead of syncing them
Global file system putting one namespace over object storage across sites
Petabyte-scale object storage software on your own hardware
S3-compatible object storage distributed in encrypted pieces across independently operated nodes
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Ceph, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Cloud filesystem that streams large media files on demand instead of syncing them
Per member per month plus storageGoogle's consumer cloud storage app, sharing the same 15GB quota as Gmail and Google Photos
Free tier plus paid storage add-onS3-compatible object storage server you run yourself, now under AGPL with a stripped community edition
Open source, no licence fee