Clevervs
ClassLink


ClassLink: ClassLink charges the district directly, which gives the district a support relationship and commercial leverage that the free Clever model does not.

Single sign-on and roster synchronisation between district student records and classroom applications
As of 31 August 2026, Clever is free to use. Clever sits between a district student information system and the several hundred applications a district licences, passing rosters and login identity to each one. Softwr lists it under Education. Clever is made by Clever Inc. (Kahoot! ASA), available on Web, iOS, Android, ChromeOS.
Overview
Clever is a rostering and identity layer for schools in the United States. It reads student, teacher, section and enrolment data from a student information system such as PowerSchool, Infinite Campus or Skyward, normalises it, and pushes it to each connected application on a schedule. Pupils sign in once at a Clever portal, or with a printed QR badge if they are too young to type a password, and reach every licensed application without a second credential. The distinguishing fact is the direction of payment. Core Clever is free to districts because software vendors pay to be in the library and to receive clean rosters, so Clever is effectively a marketplace gatekeeper funded by the sell side. That has two commercial consequences. Application vendors build the fee into the price a district pays for the application, so the district pays for Clever indirectly, and a vendor that refuses to pay is harder for a district to adopt because rostering has to be built by hand. Ownership matters here too. Kahoot! acquired Clever in 2021, and Kahoot! was itself taken private by a Goldman Sachs led investor group in 2023, so the roadmap for a piece of shared district infrastructure now sits inside a private equity owned games company. Buyers are district IT directors and data managers, not teachers. The trade off is concentration risk. Rostering is the least visible and most load bearing system a district runs, and once several hundred applications depend on one synchronisation path, an outage or a data mapping error propagates to every classroom at once. Clever is FERPA aligned as a school official under district direction, handles COPPA obligations through district consent rather than parental consent, and is a Student Privacy Pledge signatory.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Clever.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


ClassLink: ClassLink charges the district directly, which gives the district a support relationship and commercial leverage that the free Clever model does not.


PowerSchool: If the student information system is already PowerSchool, its own rostering and single sign-on removes one vendor from the chain.


Infinite Campus: Districts on Infinite Campus can use its native rostering exports where the application list is short enough to manage directly.
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Clever core rostering and single sign-on
On request
Clever paid district products
On request
Capabilities
Secure Sync
Reads and normalises rosters from the student information system and pushes them to connected applications
Clever portal
One sign in page from which pupils and staff reach every licensed application
Clever Badges
Printed QR codes that let non readers log in without typing a password
Instant Login
Passes identity to applications so no separate account creation is needed
Clever IDM
Provisions and deprovisions Google Workspace and Microsoft accounts from the source of record
Application analytics
Shows which licensed applications are actually being opened and by whom
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
The core rostering and single sign-on service is free to districts. Application vendors pay for the connection and build that cost into what they charge the district, so the money reaches Clever through the software bill instead of a direct invoice.
Clever operates as a school official under FERPA, acting on district instruction, and relies on district consent rather than parental consent for COPPA. It has signed the Student Privacy Pledge.
Every connected application loses its roster feed and needs a replacement method, either a competing rostering service or manual CSV uploads per application. That is why districts rarely switch once more than a handful of applications depend on it.
Keep looking
Single sign-on, rostering and usage analytics for school districts
K-12 student information system sold direct to districts and state education agencies
Student information system built around California state reporting for public school districts
Unified school to home messaging across text, email, app and voice with automatic translation
School web filtering, classroom control and student wellbeing alerting from the Qoria group
Classroom visibility and workflow layer over Google Workspace for Education
Student information and school ERP for K-12 districts and municipalities
Single database student information, admissions, billing and fundraising system for independent schools
Astronomy app sold in three tiered editions, from a cheap star chart to telescope control
Filtering, classroom management and student safety monitoring for K-12 device fleets
Live online tutoring for Indian school students in Classes 1 to 10
Video platform, lecture capture, accessibility remediation and proctoring bundled for institutions
Unified school to home messaging across text, email, app and voice with automatic translation
Single database student information, admissions, billing and fundraising system for independent schools
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Clever, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Piano learning app with microphone or MIDI listening and a large licensed song catalogue
Per user per year or monthCognitive skills training app from Elevate Labs covering reading, writing, maths and speaking games
Free with a Pro subscriptionBrain training game app from Lumos Labs, which paid an FTC settlement in 2016 over unsupported cognitive improvement claims
Free with a subscriptionVocabulary and spaced repetition language app built around video clips of native speakers
Free with a Pro subscriptionLanguage learning app with a community correction feature, owned by Chegg since 2022
Free with a Premium subscriptionMIDI-only practice app for keyboard, pad controllers and electronic drums, precise rather than beginner-gentle
Per user per month or yearFree citizen-science checklist app from Cornell Lab of Ornithology for logging bird sightings
Free, no ads and no in-app purchasesFree open source spaced repetition flashcard app, free everywhere except iOS where it is a paid one-time purchase
Open source, no licence fee except a paid iOS app