E
Everfit
Online coaching software for fitness professionals
Pricing on request
Loading category
Category
Fitness & Wellness software and applications
Every listing shows its published starting price on the same footing, so a shortlist does not take ten tabs.
Counted from the published pricing of the 37 listings on this page. A tool counts as free only where it publishes a $0 plan, an open-source licence or a starting price of zero.
Paid fitness & wellness plans in this set start anywhere from $2.99 a month for Hevy to $200 for Mariana Tek. The median entry price across the 30 tools that publish one is $19.99, half of them start below that figure and half above it.
Entry price is not the ceiling. The dearest published tier anywhere in this category is Tempo's at $2,495 a month, 12.5× the highest entry price on the page. Read the top of each ladder as well as the bottom, because that is where you land after two years of growth.
6 of 37 publish a $0 plan, and 1 of those charge nothing at all. 25 tools have no free tier of any kind.
1 of 37 keep at least one tier unpriced and sold by quote, which in practice means the number you end up paying at the top end is not on this page or on theirs.
The billing model each of the 37 fitness & wellness listings publishes, counted. Two tools at the same headline price are not the same purchase if one of them charges per seat.
Separately, 1 of 37 publish at least one tier with no price attached. Those are sold by quote, so the top of the ladder is negotiable, and unknowable, until you talk to sales.
Every capability named in a published pricing tier by any of the 22 fitness & wellness tools here that break their plans down, counted once per vendor. This measures what vendors choose to advertise as a selling point, not everything the software does, an absence below is silence, not a missing feature.
Named by exactly one vendor: Ad-free, Automation, Custom routine sharing, Integrations, Personalized plans, Staff app. Those are differentiators rather than table stakes.
The subject tags that recur across these 37 listings, with the number of tools carrying each. A category label is a filing decision; this is the closer read of what is actually filed under it.
Carried by a single tool: accountability, boutique, conditioning, functional-fitness, lululemon, nike, psychology, smart-ring. If one of those is the reason you are here, the category page is the wrong lens, go straight to that product.
Four things the numbers above should change about your shortlist.
6 of 37 fitness & wellness tools here publish a $0 plan, which is enough to run a real trial without a purchase order. A free tier is worth more than a free trial when you are evaluating: a trial expires on the vendor's schedule, a free plan expires when you outgrow it. The thing to check before you commit is which of the capabilities below sit above the free line, starting with analytics, the single most frequently named capability in this category's published tiers.
$2.99 to $200 is a $197.01 spread on entry price alone, and a spread that wide is never about polish, it is about who the vendor built for. Tools at the bottom of this ladder are priced for one person or a small team; tools near $200 are priced for a department with a procurement process. Decide which of those you are before you compare capability, or you will shortlist four tools that were never competing for the same buyer.
4 of 37 tools here publish three or more tiers, and the median vendor in this category ships 2 of them. The advertised price is the first rung, and the things teams tend to need, analytics, multi-location, advanced analytics, are named in higher plans far more often than in entry ones. Price your shortlist at the tier that contains what you need, not at the tier on the pricing page's left edge.
This category splits across 3 billing models: subscription on 20 listings, freemium on 3, and 1 other arrangement across the rest. A per-user price and a flat subscription at the same headline figure are not the same purchase, the first one grows with headcount and the second does not. Multiply by your real team size before you compare two numbers side by side.
Every pairing below is a full comparison: the same checklist applied to both, so a gap in one is a gap in the other.
Answered from the listings on this page, and nowhere else.
Adjacent in the same taxonomy, not a ranking.
