Manufacturing · head to head
Xometry vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP

Xometry
Manufacturing
Custom parts marketplace whose quoting software is free because the money is in the order
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Yokogawa CENTUM VP
Manufacturing
Distributed control system for continuous process plants with a documented 30-year upgrade path
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Xometry has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Xometry xometry is the counterparty rather than the shop, and the margin between what you pay and what the maker receives is never disclosed, so buyers cannot benchmark the part price.; Yokogawa CENTUM VP there is no published price list and no way to size a budget without engaging Yokogawa or an EPC, so early-stage comparison against DeltaV or Experion is guesswork until quotations arrive.
- They diverge on capability: Xometry covers Instant Quoting Engine, Yokogawa CENTUM VP covers Field Control Station.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Xometry and Yokogawa CENTUM VP actually diverge.
| Attribute | Xometry | Yokogawa CENTUM VP |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per order, priced on the part | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, API | Windows, On-premise |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Xometry
- Instant Quoting Engine
- Multi-process coverage
- Teamspace
- Thomasnet
- Supplier network
- Certifications
Only in Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Field Control Station
- N-IO
- Human Interface Station
- ProSafe-RS integration
- Vnet/IP
- Migration from CS 1000 and CS 3000
- Exaquantum integration
- Alarm management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Xometry
- An engineering team needing machined prototypes in a week without qualifying a shopnot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- A procurement group consolidating dozens of low-value part suppliers onto one purchase ordernot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- A startup with no supply chain buying a first low-volume production runnot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- A design team price-checking a geometry change before committing to itnot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Replacing end-of-life CENTUM CS 3000 controllers during a refinery turnaround without pulling field cablingnot Xometry
- Greenfield LNG train where the control and safety systems must share one operator console and one event lognot Xometry
- Specialty chemicals batch plant needing sequence control with recipe management and full electronic batch recordsnot Xometry
- Combined cycle power station where 99.99999 percent availability figures are written into the contractnot Xometry
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Xometry
- Xometry is the counterparty rather than the shop, and the margin between what you pay and what the maker receives is never disclosed, so buyers cannot benchmark the part price.
- You usually do not choose or even know which supplier makes the part, so repeat orders can come from different shops with visibly different finish and process consistency.
- For parts bought repeatedly over years the marketplace margin compounds, and qualifying a shop directly becomes materially cheaper.
- Instant quotes are geometry-driven and degrade on unusual features, tight tolerances or complex assemblies, where a manual review changes the price after you have planned around the automated figure.
- Because the software is free and the revenue is in orders, there is no software contract to hold the vendor to; support and continuity are governed by your value as a parts customer, not by a licence.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- There is no published price list and no way to size a budget without engaging Yokogawa or an EPC, so early-stage comparison against DeltaV or Experion is guesswork until quotations arrive.
- Engineering and commissioning routinely cost several times the hardware and software, and owners who budget from the equipment quote alone are consistently short.
- The ecosystem is closed: controllers, I/O and diagnostics are Yokogawa, and third-party alternatives at the controller layer do not exist, so the vendor holds pricing power for the twenty years or more the plant runs.
- Operator stations run on Windows and are tied to specific validated Windows releases, so operating system end-of-life forces console refresh cycles that are governed by Yokogawa validation rather than by your IT policy.
- Engineering staff who know CENTUM are scarce outside Japan, the Middle East and South East Asia, and in North America and Europe you will pay a premium or depend on Yokogawa’s own services organisation for changes.
Pricing, plan by plan
Xometry
Free- Buyer accountFree
- Instant Quoting Engine at no charge
- Teamspace collaboration
- Thomasnet sourcing access
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Negotiated part pricing and terms
- Dedicated account and programme management
- Procurement system integration
Yokogawa CENTUM VP
On request- CENTUM VP$undefined/year
- Priced as an engineered system, not a per-seat licence
- Cost driven by I/O count, controller redundancy and number of operator stations
- Engineering, FAT, commissioning and training quoted separately and usually exceed hardware
Which should you pick?
Choose Xometry if
- You need instant quoting engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want multi-process coverage.
Choose Yokogawa CENTUM VP if
- You need field control station.
- You work on Windows, On-premise.
- You also want n-io.
Questions people ask
- Is Xometry or Yokogawa CENTUM VP better?
- Neither clearly leads. Xometry starts at Free and Yokogawa CENTUM VP at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Xometry or Yokogawa CENTUM VP?
- Xometry has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Xometry and On request for Yokogawa CENTUM VP.
- Does Xometry or Yokogawa CENTUM VP run on more platforms?
- Xometry runs on Web, API. Yokogawa CENTUM VP runs on Windows, On-premise.
- Can I use Xometry for free?
- Yes. Xometry has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Yokogawa CENTUM VP starts at On request.
- What is Xometry best used for?
- Xometry is most often used for an engineering team needing machined prototypes in a week without qualifying a shop, a procurement group consolidating dozens of low-value part suppliers onto one purchase order, a startup with no supply chain buying a first low-volume production run, a design team price-checking a geometry change before committing to it. Of those, an engineering team needing machined prototypes in a week without qualifying a shop and a procurement group consolidating dozens of low-value part suppliers onto one purchase order are not what Yokogawa CENTUM VP is typically brought in for.
- What can Xometry do that Yokogawa CENTUM VP cannot?
- Xometry covers Instant Quoting Engine, Multi-process coverage, Teamspace, Thomasnet. Yokogawa CENTUM VP covers Field Control Station, N-IO, Human Interface Station, ProSafe-RS integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Xometry: Does the Xometry software cost anything?
No. Quoting and Teamspace are free. Xometry earns on the parts you order, with the margin built into the part price.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: Can I upgrade from CENTUM CS 3000 without rewiring the plant?
Yes. Yokogawa sells migration packages that replace the controller and keep existing field wiring and marshalling, which is the main reason CENTUM installations stay CENTUM.
Xometry: Do I get to choose the shop?
Normally no. Xometry routes the job within its supplier network and remains your contracting party.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: Is CENTUM VP sold as a subscription?
No. It is a capital purchase of hardware and licences with an annual service agreement for updates and support.
Xometry: Is it cheaper than going direct to a machine shop?
For one-off and low-volume work usually yes, once you count sourcing time. For repeat production the marketplace margin makes a direct qualified supplier cheaper.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: How does it compare with Emerson DeltaV on cost?
Neither publishes prices. CENTUM tends to win on brownfield migration cost because the field wiring stays; DeltaV tends to be cheaper on small greenfield systems.
Xometry: Can it handle ITAR or aerospace work?
It offers ITAR-registered and AS9100 routing on qualifying orders, but you must specify those requirements at quote time.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: Do I need a separate safety system?
Yes, for SIL-rated functions. ProSafe-RS is the Yokogawa SIS and shares the CENTUM engineering database and operator console.
Related pages
More on Yokogawa CENTUM VP
Other head to heads
- Xometry vs Protolabs
- Xometry vs Fictiv
- Xometry vs Paperless Parts
- Xometry vs Formlabs PreForm
- Xometry vs Markforged Eiger
- Xometry vs GrabCAD Print
- Xometry vs Materialise Magics
- Xometry vs Simplify3D
- Xometry vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Xometry vs Oqton
- Xometry vs 3YOURMIND
- Xometry vs JobBOSS²
- Xometry vs Duro PLM
- Xometry vs Dyndrite
- Xometry vs Erbessd Instruments
- Xometry vs Flow Software
- Xometry vs Ignition
- Xometry vs ABB 800xA
- Xometry vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Xometry vs AVEVA System Platform
- Xometry vs GENESIS Version 11
- Xometry vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Xometry vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Xometry vs QAD Redzone
- Xometry vs Sight Machine
- Xometry vs Authentise
- Xometry vs Oden Technologies
- Xometry vs Guidewheel
- Xometry vs Kepware Server
- Xometry vs Litmus Edge
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Protolabs
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Fictiv
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Paperless Parts
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Formlabs PreForm
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Markforged Eiger
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs GrabCAD Print
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Materialise Magics
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Simplify3D
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Oqton
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs 3YOURMIND
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs JobBOSS²
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Duro PLM
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Dyndrite
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Erbessd Instruments
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Flow Software
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Ignition
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs ABB 800xA
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs AVEVA System Platform
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs GENESIS Version 11
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs QAD Redzone
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Sight Machine
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Authentise
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Oden Technologies
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Guidewheel
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Kepware Server
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Litmus Edge
