Accounting · head to head
Basware vs Workiva
Basware
Accounting
Invoice automation and e-invoicing compliance across a large number of national mandates
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
Workiva
Accounting
Connected reporting platform for SEC filings, iXBRL tagging, SOX and sustainability disclosure
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Basware the e-invoicing compliance breadth that justifies the price is worthless to a company operating in a single country, where cheaper AP automation tools will do the same work.; Workiva pricing is quoted per solution and per user and is not published, and because moving a filing cycle off the platform carries deadline risk, renewal negotiations favour the vendor heavily.
- They diverge on capability: Basware covers Invoice capture, Workiva covers Linked data.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Basware and Workiva actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Accounting).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Basware
- Invoice capture
- Matching
- Approval workflow
- E-invoicing compliance
- Supplier network
- Payment execution
- Spend analytics
- ERP integration
Only in Workiva
- Linked data
- Inline XBRL tagging
- SEC filing
- SOX and controls
- Sustainability reporting
- Audit trail
- Collaboration
- Data connectors
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Basware
- A multinational needing compliant electronic invoicing across Italy, Poland, France and Mexico without building each mandate itselfnot Workiva
- A shared service centre processing hundreds of thousands of invoices a year that needs touchless processing rates measured and improvednot Workiva
- A group standardising accounts payable across subsidiaries running different ERP systemsnot Workiva
- A finance function trying to capture early payment discounts that are currently lost to slow approval cyclesnot Workiva
Workiva
- A newly public company facing its first 10-K where the tie-out process in Word and Excel is not survivable at the deadlinenot Basware
- A European group preparing CSRD sustainability disclosure that must be assurance-ready rather than a marketing documentnot Basware
- A finance team whose auditors keep raising review points about version control and unsupported changes in the reporting packnot Basware
- A group with several statutory filers that wants one set of numbers feeding many jurisdictional reportsnot Basware
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Basware
- The e-invoicing compliance breadth that justifies the price is worthless to a company operating in a single country, where cheaper AP automation tools will do the same work.
- Implementation is a substantial integration project involving ERP connectors, supplier onboarding and country-by-country compliance configuration, and it is priced and timed accordingly.
- The user interface is dated next to newer accounts payable products, and approvers outside finance find it unintuitive, which slows the very cycle times the system is bought to improve.
- Supplier onboarding onto the network is the hidden effort: the touchless processing rate depends on how many suppliers actually send electronic invoices, and that is a change management programme, not a software setting.
- Growth by acquisition, including Glantus, has left overlapping analytics capability and integration work still in progress, so buyers should check which components share a data model today.
Workiva
- Pricing is quoted per solution and per user and is not published, and because moving a filing cycle off the platform carries deadline risk, renewal negotiations favour the vendor heavily.
- Cost is difficult to justify for smaller filers whose reporting burden is a single 10-K a year, where an outsourced financial printer is cheaper.
- Getting the initial linked-data structure right is a substantial project, and companies that rush the first cycle end up with links that break and a manual tie-out anyway.
- The spreadsheet interface is deliberately not Excel and finance teams accustomed to Excel keyboard behaviour and modelling features find it slower for anything analytical.
- ESG and sustainability modules were added later than the financial reporting core and buyers report them as less mature, so a company buying primarily for CSRD is buying the newer and weaker half of the product.
Pricing, plan by plan
Basware
On request- Basware$undefined/year
- Invoice automation, matching and approval
- E-invoicing compliance across national mandates
- Supplier network connectivity
Workiva
On request- Workiva Platform$undefined/year
- Linked data across documents and spreadsheets
- SEC and ESEF filing with iXBRL tagging
- SOX, internal audit and statutory reporting modules
Which should you pick?
Choose Basware if
- You need invoice capture.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want matching.
Questions people ask
- Is Basware or Workiva better?
- Neither clearly leads. Basware starts at On request and Workiva at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Basware or Workiva?
- Basware starts at On request and Workiva at On request.
- Does Basware or Workiva run on more platforms?
- Basware runs on Web, iOS, Android. Workiva runs on Web.
- What is Basware best used for?
- Basware is most often used for a multinational needing compliant electronic invoicing across italy, poland, france and mexico without building each mandate itself, a shared service centre processing hundreds of thousands of invoices a year that needs touchless processing rates measured and improved, a group standardising accounts payable across subsidiaries running different erp systems, a finance function trying to capture early payment discounts that are currently lost to slow approval cycles. Of those, a multinational needing compliant electronic invoicing across italy, poland, france and mexico without building each mandate itself and a shared service centre processing hundreds of thousands of invoices a year that needs touchless processing rates measured and improved are not what Workiva is typically brought in for.
- What can Basware do that Workiva cannot?
- Basware covers Invoice capture, Matching, Approval workflow, E-invoicing compliance. Workiva covers Linked data, Inline XBRL tagging, SEC filing, SOX and controls.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Basware: Should we buy Basware if we only operate in one country?
Probably not. Its main advantage is multi-country e-invoicing compliance. In a single jurisdiction, cheaper AP automation gives you the same result.
Workiva: Does Workiva do the XBRL tagging for me?
The platform provides tagging tools and validation, and Workiva offers services, but the tagging judgement remains the filer's responsibility.
Basware: Does it handle mandatory e-invoicing regimes?
Yes, and that is the core reason to choose it. It covers a wide set of national mandates as a service rather than an integration project you run yourself.
Workiva: Is it only for US SEC filers?
No. It supports European ESEF filings, statutory reporting in several jurisdictions and sustainability frameworks such as CSRD and ISSB.
Basware: What drives the price?
Invoice volume, number of countries and modules. It is quoted, and implementation with ERP connectors and supplier onboarding is separate.
Workiva: What does it cost?
Not published. Expect tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars a year depending on solutions and user count.
Basware: What determines the return?
The share of invoices arriving electronically. Touchless rates depend on supplier adoption, so budget for a supplier onboarding programme, not just the software.
Workiva: Can it replace our consolidation system?
No. It reports on consolidated numbers and connects to ERP and consolidation tools, but it does not perform the consolidation.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Basware vs Yooz
- Basware vs Stampli
- Basware vs Tipalti
- Basware vs Ottimate
- Basware vs Medius Expense
- Basware vs Moss
- Basware vs Avalara
- Basware vs Creem
- Basware vs Vertex
- Basware vs Melio
- Basware vs Kodo
- Basware vs SAP Concur
- Basware vs Zoho Books
- Basware vs Zuora
- Basware vs Airwallex
- Basware vs Bench
- Basware vs Zoho Expense
- Basware vs BlackLine
- Basware vs FloQast
- Basware vs insightsoftware
- Basware vs Sage 50
- Basware vs Metronome
- Basware vs Maxio
- Basware vs Adyen
- Basware vs Brex
- Basware vs Bill.com
- Basware vs Modern Treasury
- Basware vs Cledara
- Basware vs Polar
- Basware vs Carta
- Basware vs Causal
- Basware vs Conta
- Basware vs DATEV
- Basware vs Conta Azul
- Workiva vs Yooz
- Workiva vs Stampli
- Workiva vs Tipalti
- Workiva vs Ottimate
- Workiva vs Medius Expense
- Workiva vs Moss
- Workiva vs Avalara
- Workiva vs Creem
- Workiva vs Vertex
- Workiva vs Melio
- Workiva vs Kodo
- Workiva vs SAP Concur
- Workiva vs Zoho Books
- Workiva vs Zuora
- Workiva vs Airwallex
- Workiva vs Bench
- Workiva vs Zoho Expense
- Workiva vs BlackLine
- Workiva vs FloQast
- Workiva vs insightsoftware
- Workiva vs Sage 50
- Workiva vs Metronome
- Workiva vs Maxio
- Workiva vs Adyen
- Workiva vs Brex
- Workiva vs Bill.com
- Workiva vs Modern Treasury
- Workiva vs Cledara
- Workiva vs Polar
- Workiva vs Carta
- Workiva vs Causal
- Workiva vs Conta
- Workiva vs DATEV
- Workiva vs Conta Azul