Healthcare · head to head
Ibex Medical Analytics vs Visage Imaging

Ibex Medical Analytics
Healthcare
Cancer detection AI for breast, prostate and gastric pathology deployed in routine clinical service, not just pilots
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Visage Imaging
Healthcare
Server-side streaming PACS built for radiologists reading very large studies over thin connections
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Ibex Medical Analytics the European IVDR indication is broader than the United States position, where some applications operate under laboratory developed test arrangements rather than FDA authorisation, which determines whether AI output can influence a signed report.; Visage Imaging pricing is per exam against a minimum annual volume, so an organisation whose imaging activity is flat pays a floor while a growing one sees the software line rise every year rather than amortise.
- They diverge on capability: Ibex Medical Analytics covers Ibex Breast Suite, Visage Imaging covers Server-side rendering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ibex Medical Analytics and Visage Imaging actually diverge.
| Attribute | Ibex Medical Analytics | Visage Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Cloud, On-premise | Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ibex Medical Analytics
- Ibex Breast Suite
- Ibex Prostate
- Ibex Gastric
- Second read safety net
- Prescreening triage
- Heatmap localisation
- Quality reporting
- Scanner-agnostic ingestion
Only in Visage Imaging
- Server-side rendering
- One Viewer
- Native multi-dimensional tools
- Digital breast tomosynthesis reading
- Open archive
- Cloud PACS operations
- AI accelerator
- On the fly patient jacket
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ibex Medical Analytics
- A histopathology department that cannot recruit and wants an automated safety net on every prostate and breast biopsy before sign outnot Visage Imaging
- A private laboratory group standardising Gleason grading across pathologists with known interobserver variabilitynot Visage Imaging
- A service digitising histopathology that needs a clinical governance argument to justify the scanning programme to its boardnot Visage Imaging
- A gastrointestinal service wanting Helicobacter pylori detection automated so pathologists spend their time on the neoplastic casesnot Visage Imaging
Visage Imaging
- An academic health system whose radiologists read from home and cannot tolerate a thousand slice CT taking minutes to opennot Ibex Medical Analytics
- A breast imaging service moving to tomosynthesis where study sizes have made the existing PACS unusable at volumenot Ibex Medical Analytics
- A teleradiology group covering many client sites that needs one viewer rather than a client-specific workstation per contractnot Ibex Medical Analytics
- A health system mid migration that needs priors from three legacy archives assembled into one patient jacket before the data move finishesnot Ibex Medical Analytics
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ibex Medical Analytics
- The European IVDR indication is broader than the United States position, where some applications operate under laboratory developed test arrangements rather than FDA authorisation, which determines whether AI output can influence a signed report.
- It requires a fully digitised histopathology workflow, and slide scanning, storage and validation typically cost several times the algorithm licence.
- Running it as a second read safety net adds a discrepancy resolution workload that departments consistently underestimate, and someone senior has to adjudicate every flag.
- Coverage is limited to breast, prostate and gastric, so a general histopathology department still reads the majority of its case mix without any AI support.
- Pricing is per case and unpublished, so cost scales directly with biopsy volume and does not flatten as the department grows.
Visage Imaging
- Pricing is per exam against a minimum annual volume, so an organisation whose imaging activity is flat pays a floor while a growing one sees the software line rise every year rather than amortise.
- Module breadth outside radiology is narrower than at Sectra or the large modality vendors, so a group planning to digitise pathology on the same platform will not find it here.
- Server-side rendering shifts the cost to central infrastructure, so the saving on radiologist workstations is partly offset by what you spend on servers or cloud compute.
- Pro Medicus concentrates on very large contracts, and smaller imaging groups report long sales cycles and little appetite from the vendor for deals below a certain volume.
- Diagnostic AI is third party, surfaced through the accelerator framework rather than developed in house, so algorithm licensing, validation and monitoring remain the buyer problem.
Pricing, plan by plan
Ibex Medical Analytics
On request- Ibex clinical applications$undefined/year
- Priced per case analysed under an annual agreement
- Breast, prostate and gastric licensed as separate suites
- Regulatory indication differs between Europe and the United States
Visage Imaging
On request- Visage 7 enterprise contract$undefined/year
- Transaction pricing per exam with a minimum annual volume commitment
- Seven to ten year terms typical for health system contracts
- Contract totals for major deals are disclosed by Pro Medicus to the ASX
Which should you pick?
Choose Ibex Medical Analytics if
- You need ibex breast suite.
- You work on Web, Cloud, On-premise.
- You also want ibex prostate.
Choose Visage Imaging if
- You need server-side rendering.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud.
- You also want one viewer.
Questions people ask
- Is Ibex Medical Analytics or Visage Imaging better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ibex Medical Analytics starts at On request and Visage Imaging at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ibex Medical Analytics or Visage Imaging?
- Ibex Medical Analytics starts at On request and Visage Imaging at On request.
- Does Ibex Medical Analytics or Visage Imaging run on more platforms?
- Ibex Medical Analytics runs on Web, Cloud, On-premise. Visage Imaging runs on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud.
- What is Ibex Medical Analytics best used for?
- Ibex Medical Analytics is most often used for a histopathology department that cannot recruit and wants an automated safety net on every prostate and breast biopsy before sign out, a private laboratory group standardising gleason grading across pathologists with known interobserver variability, a service digitising histopathology that needs a clinical governance argument to justify the scanning programme to its board, a gastrointestinal service wanting helicobacter pylori detection automated so pathologists spend their time on the neoplastic cases. Of those, a histopathology department that cannot recruit and wants an automated safety net on every prostate and breast biopsy before sign out and a private laboratory group standardising gleason grading across pathologists with known interobserver variability are not what Visage Imaging is typically brought in for.
- What can Ibex Medical Analytics do that Visage Imaging cannot?
- Ibex Medical Analytics covers Ibex Breast Suite, Ibex Prostate, Ibex Gastric, Second read safety net. Visage Imaging covers Server-side rendering, One Viewer, Native multi-dimensional tools, Digital breast tomosynthesis reading.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ibex Medical Analytics: Is Ibex FDA cleared?
The regulatory position differs by product and market. In Europe the products carry CE marking under IVDR for defined diagnostic indications; in the United States some applications are used under laboratory developed test arrangements. Confirm the exact status for the specific application and market before assuming it can influence a signed report.
Visage Imaging: Who owns Visage Imaging?
Pro Medicus Limited, listed on the Australian Securities Exchange. That listing means major contract values and terms are publicly announced.
Ibex Medical Analytics: Second read or prescreening?
Both are supported. Second read as a safety net is the more common clinical governance justification; prescreening is the efficiency case.
Visage Imaging: How is Visage priced?
Per exam, against a minimum annual volume, on multi-year terms. Because Pro Medicus discloses large contract totals and durations to the market, buyers can estimate a per exam rate before entering negotiation.
Ibex Medical Analytics: Does it need a particular scanner?
It ingests from the major whole slide scanner vendors rather than requiring a single fleet, which is a practical advantage over vendors tied to one scanner.
Visage Imaging: Is Visage 7 FDA cleared for diagnostic interpretation?
Yes, Visage 7 holds 510(k) clearance for diagnostic viewing including mammography and tomosynthesis on validated displays. Confirm the exact cleared modality list for your intended use.
Ibex Medical Analytics: What tissue types are covered?
Breast, prostate and gastric. Everything else in the case mix is unsupported.
Visage Imaging: Does it work as a full cloud PACS?
Yes, Visage 7 runs complete PACS operations in the cloud rather than cloud viewing over an on-premise archive.
Related pages
More on Ibex Medical Analytics
More on Visage Imaging
Other head to heads
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Paige
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Sectra
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Techcyte
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Annalise.ai
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Gleamer
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs PathAI
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Lunit
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Ambra Health
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Liberty Software
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs OpenMRS
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Kareo Clinical
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Practice Fusion
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Ro
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs RXNT
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Signant Health
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Sysmex
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Talkspace
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Rad AI
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Epic Systems
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Aidoc
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Clue
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Allscripts
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Dentrix
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs DHIS2
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Flo
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Epic MyChart
- Visage Imaging vs Paige
- Visage Imaging vs Sectra
- Visage Imaging vs Techcyte
- Visage Imaging vs Annalise.ai
- Visage Imaging vs Gleamer
- Visage Imaging vs PathAI
- Visage Imaging vs Lunit
- Visage Imaging vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- Visage Imaging vs Ambra Health
- Visage Imaging vs Liberty Software
- Visage Imaging vs OpenMRS
- Visage Imaging vs Kareo Clinical
- Visage Imaging vs Practice Fusion
- Visage Imaging vs Ro
- Visage Imaging vs RXNT
- Visage Imaging vs Signant Health
- Visage Imaging vs Sysmex
- Visage Imaging vs Talkspace
- Visage Imaging vs Rad AI
- Visage Imaging vs Epic Systems
- Visage Imaging vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Visage Imaging vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Visage Imaging vs Aidoc
- Visage Imaging vs Clue
- Visage Imaging vs Allscripts
- Visage Imaging vs Dentrix
- Visage Imaging vs DHIS2
- Visage Imaging vs Flo
- Visage Imaging vs Epic MyChart
