Healthcare · head to head
Epic Systems vs Visage Imaging

Epic Systems
Healthcare
Leading electronic health records system for healthcare organizations
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Visage Imaging
Healthcare
Server-side streaming PACS built for radiologists reading very large studies over thin connections
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Epic Systems no free version or trial; enterprise pricing only with custom negotiation required; Visage Imaging pricing is per exam against a minimum annual volume, so an organisation whose imaging activity is flat pays a floor while a growing one sees the software line rise every year rather than amortise.
- They diverge on capability: Epic Systems covers Electronic Health Records, Visage Imaging covers Server-side rendering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Epic Systems and Visage Imaging actually diverge.
| Attribute | Epic Systems | Visage Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Desktop, Mobile | Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud |
| Founded | 1979 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Epic Systems
- Electronic Health Records
- Revenue Cycle Management
- Patient Portal
- Clinical Decision Support
- Population Health
- Lab Systems
- Imaging Systems
- Pharmacy Systems
Only in Visage Imaging
- Server-side rendering
- One Viewer
- Native multi-dimensional tools
- Digital breast tomosynthesis reading
- Open archive
- Cloud PACS operations
- AI accelerator
- On the fly patient jacket
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Epic Systems
- Patient Carenot Visage Imaging
- Medical Recordsnot Visage Imaging
- Practice Managementnot Visage Imaging
- Telehealthnot Visage Imaging
Visage Imaging
- An academic health system whose radiologists read from home and cannot tolerate a thousand slice CT taking minutes to opennot Epic Systems
- A breast imaging service moving to tomosynthesis where study sizes have made the existing PACS unusable at volumenot Epic Systems
- A teleradiology group covering many client sites that needs one viewer rather than a client-specific workstation per contractnot Epic Systems
- A health system mid migration that needs priors from three legacy archives assembled into one patient jacket before the data move finishesnot Epic Systems
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Epic Systems
- No free version or trial; enterprise pricing only with custom negotiation required
- Lengthy implementation timeline: 12-24 months for single hospitals, 3-5 years for multi-system rollouts
- Customization and workflow adaptation requires extensive consulting services
- Very high licensing costs ranging from 100,000 to 30 million USD depending on organization size
Visage Imaging
- Pricing is per exam against a minimum annual volume, so an organisation whose imaging activity is flat pays a floor while a growing one sees the software line rise every year rather than amortise.
- Module breadth outside radiology is narrower than at Sectra or the large modality vendors, so a group planning to digitise pathology on the same platform will not find it here.
- Server-side rendering shifts the cost to central infrastructure, so the saving on radiologist workstations is partly offset by what you spend on servers or cloud compute.
- Pro Medicus concentrates on very large contracts, and smaller imaging groups report long sales cycles and little appetite from the vendor for deals below a certain volume.
- Diagnostic AI is third party, surfaced through the accelerator framework rather than developed in house, so algorithm licensing, validation and monitoring remain the buyer problem.
Pricing, plan by plan
Epic Systems
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Epic Systems review.
Visage Imaging
On request- Visage 7 enterprise contract$undefined/year
- Transaction pricing per exam with a minimum annual volume commitment
- Seven to ten year terms typical for health system contracts
- Contract totals for major deals are disclosed by Pro Medicus to the ASX
Which should you pick?
Choose Epic Systems if
- You need electronic health records.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Mobile.
- You also want revenue cycle management.
Choose Visage Imaging if
- You need server-side rendering.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud.
- You also want one viewer.
Questions people ask
- Is Epic Systems or Visage Imaging better?
- Neither clearly leads. Epic Systems starts at On request and Visage Imaging at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Epic Systems or Visage Imaging?
- Epic Systems starts at On request and Visage Imaging at On request.
- Does Epic Systems or Visage Imaging run on more platforms?
- Epic Systems runs on Web, Desktop, Mobile. Visage Imaging runs on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud.
- What is Epic Systems best used for?
- Epic Systems is most often used for patient care, medical records, practice management, telehealth. Of those, patient care and medical records are not what Visage Imaging is typically brought in for.
- What can Epic Systems do that Visage Imaging cannot?
- Epic Systems covers Electronic Health Records, Revenue Cycle Management, Patient Portal, Clinical Decision Support. Visage Imaging covers Server-side rendering, One Viewer, Native multi-dimensional tools, Digital breast tomosynthesis reading.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Epic Systems: What is Epic's market position?
Epic holds 36 percent of the U.S. EHR market and manages over 280 million patient records across 1,200+ healthcare organizations. Among hospitals with over 300 beds, Epic has 52 percent market share, and 71 percent market share in major academic medical centers as of 2026.
SourceVisage Imaging: Who owns Visage Imaging?
Pro Medicus Limited, listed on the Australian Securities Exchange. That listing means major contract values and terms are publicly announced.
Epic Systems: Is there a free trial or demo available?
Epic does not offer a free version or trial. The software is enterprise-only with custom pricing negotiated directly with organizations. Typical implementation timelines for single hospitals range from 12 to 24 months, and multi-hospital systems can take 3 to 5 years for phased rollouts.
SourceVisage Imaging: How is Visage priced?
Per exam, against a minimum annual volume, on multi-year terms. Because Pro Medicus discloses large contract totals and durations to the market, buyers can estimate a per exam rate before entering negotiation.
Epic Systems: How does Epic integrate with third-party systems?
Epic provides multiple integration pathways: FHIR R4 APIs, HL7 v2 messaging, CCDA document exchange, and proprietary APIs through Epic Showroom (formerly App Orchard). Over 1,000 certified apps are available in the marketplace, enabling real-time data synchronization and interoperability.
SourceVisage Imaging: Is Visage 7 FDA cleared for diagnostic interpretation?
Yes, Visage 7 holds 510(k) clearance for diagnostic viewing including mammography and tomosynthesis on validated displays. Confirm the exact cleared modality list for your intended use.
Epic Systems: What is included in Epic's unified platform?
Epic provides a truly unified system spanning inpatient, outpatient, emergency department, surgical, pharmacy, laboratory, radiology, billing, and population health on a single database. It includes appointment scheduling, medical billing, clinical decision support, patient portal (MyChart), telehealth capabilities, and analytics.
SourceVisage Imaging: Does it work as a full cloud PACS?
Yes, Visage 7 runs complete PACS operations in the cloud rather than cloud viewing over an on-premise archive.
Related pages
More on Epic Systems
More on Visage Imaging
Other head to heads
- Epic Systems vs Cerner
- Epic Systems vs NextGen Enterprise EHR
- Epic Systems vs Meditech
- Epic Systems vs Allscripts
- Epic Systems vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Epic Systems vs eClinicalWorks
- Epic Systems vs Athenahealth
- Epic Systems vs Dentrix
- Epic Systems vs ChiroTouch
- Epic Systems vs Ambra Health
- Epic Systems vs BestRx
- Epic Systems vs DrChrono
- Epic Systems vs Liberty Software
- Epic Systems vs Lunit
- Epic Systems vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Epic Systems vs Cerner PowerChart
- Epic Systems vs NextGen Healthcare
- Epic Systems vs athenaOne
- Epic Systems vs Sectra
- Epic Systems vs Rad AI
- Epic Systems vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Epic Systems vs Gleamer
- Epic Systems vs Annalise.ai
- Epic Systems vs OpenMRS
- Epic Systems vs Signant Health
- Epic Systems vs Aidoc
- Epic Systems vs Clue
- Epic Systems vs DHIS2
- Epic Systems vs Flo
- Epic Systems vs Epic MyChart
- Visage Imaging vs Cerner
- Visage Imaging vs NextGen Enterprise EHR
- Visage Imaging vs Meditech
- Visage Imaging vs Allscripts
- Visage Imaging vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Visage Imaging vs eClinicalWorks
- Visage Imaging vs Athenahealth
- Visage Imaging vs Dentrix
- Visage Imaging vs ChiroTouch
- Visage Imaging vs Ambra Health
- Visage Imaging vs BestRx
- Visage Imaging vs DrChrono
- Visage Imaging vs Liberty Software
- Visage Imaging vs Lunit
- Visage Imaging vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Visage Imaging vs Cerner PowerChart
- Visage Imaging vs NextGen Healthcare
- Visage Imaging vs athenaOne
- Visage Imaging vs Sectra
- Visage Imaging vs Rad AI
- Visage Imaging vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Visage Imaging vs Gleamer
- Visage Imaging vs Annalise.ai
- Visage Imaging vs OpenMRS
- Visage Imaging vs Signant Health
- Visage Imaging vs Aidoc
- Visage Imaging vs Clue
- Visage Imaging vs DHIS2
- Visage Imaging vs Flo
- Visage Imaging vs Epic MyChart
