Veterinary · head to head
VetBadger vs Visage Imaging

VetBadger
Veterinary
Cloud veterinary practice management sold in user bands rather than per seat
- From
- $99/month
- Rated
- -

Visage Imaging
Healthcare
Server-side streaming PACS built for radiologists reading very large studies over thin connections
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: VetBadger pricing is banded rather than per seat, so a three-user clinic pays USD 249, the same as a ten-user one, which is roughly USD 83 per user against USD 25 for a practice that fills the band.; Visage Imaging pricing is per exam against a minimum annual volume, so an organisation whose imaging activity is flat pays a floor while a growing one sees the software line rise every year rather than amortise.
- They diverge on capability: VetBadger covers Chart-centric workflow, Visage Imaging covers Server-side rendering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which VetBadger and Visage Imaging actually diverge.
| Attribute | VetBadger | Visage Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $99/month | On request |
| Pricing model | Per month by user band | quote |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud |
| Category | Veterinary | Healthcare |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in VetBadger
- Chart-centric workflow
- Banded pricing
- Chart SMS and email
- Integrated telehealth
- Exam reporting
- QuickBooks sync
- Cloud hosting
- Reminders
Only in Visage Imaging
- Server-side rendering
- One Viewer
- Native multi-dimensional tools
- Digital breast tomosynthesis reading
- Open archive
- Cloud PACS operations
- AI accelerator
- On the fly patient jacket
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
VetBadger
- A two-vet small animal clinic moving off an ageing on-premises server that nobody wants to maintainnot Visage Imaging
- A practice that wants client texting logged against the medical record rather than sitting in a separate messaging toolnot Visage Imaging
- A clinic adding telehealth consultations without buying a separate video and payment stacknot Visage Imaging
- An owner who wants exam and revenue reporting without exporting to a spreadsheet every monthnot Visage Imaging
Visage Imaging
- An academic health system whose radiologists read from home and cannot tolerate a thousand slice CT taking minutes to opennot VetBadger
- A breast imaging service moving to tomosynthesis where study sizes have made the existing PACS unusable at volumenot VetBadger
- A teleradiology group covering many client sites that needs one viewer rather than a client-specific workstation per contractnot VetBadger
- A health system mid migration that needs priors from three legacy archives assembled into one patient jacket before the data move finishesnot VetBadger
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
VetBadger
- Pricing is banded rather than per seat, so a three-user clinic pays USD 249, the same as a ten-user one, which is roughly USD 83 per user against USD 25 for a practice that fills the band.
- Crossing a band boundary is a step change, so hiring one extra person can raise the software bill by USD 150 or USD 250 overnight with no extra capability in return.
- The integration list is short compared with the market leaders, and in-house laboratory and imaging equipment support is the usual gap, which can mean manual result entry.
- It is aimed at general small animal practice, with none of the specialty, referral, equine or ambulatory workflow depth that larger platforms carry.
- As a smaller vendor it has less migration tooling and fewer conversion specialists than the large incumbents, so moving years of legacy records in is more of a project than a service.
Visage Imaging
- Pricing is per exam against a minimum annual volume, so an organisation whose imaging activity is flat pays a floor while a growing one sees the software line rise every year rather than amortise.
- Module breadth outside radiology is narrower than at Sectra or the large modality vendors, so a group planning to digitise pathology on the same platform will not find it here.
- Server-side rendering shifts the cost to central infrastructure, so the saving on radiologist workstations is partly offset by what you spend on servers or cloud compute.
- Pro Medicus concentrates on very large contracts, and smaller imaging groups report long sales cycles and little appetite from the vendor for deals below a certain volume.
- Diagnostic AI is third party, surfaced through the accelerator framework rather than developed in house, so algorithm licensing, validation and monitoring remain the buyer problem.
Pricing, plan by plan
VetBadger
$99/month- 1 to 2 users$99/month
- Cloud hosting and backup included
- Full medical records and scheduling
- Chart-centric SMS and email
- 3 to 10 users$249/month
- Same feature set across the band
- Flat price whether you have three users or ten
- Exam detail reporting
- 11 to 20 users$499/month
- Multi-user scheduling
- Full reporting
- Priority support
- 21 to 40 users$599/month
- Largest published band
- All features included
- Support for larger single-site practices
Visage Imaging
On request- Visage 7 enterprise contract$undefined/year
- Transaction pricing per exam with a minimum annual volume commitment
- Seven to ten year terms typical for health system contracts
- Contract totals for major deals are disclosed by Pro Medicus to the ASX
Which should you pick?
Choose VetBadger if
- You need chart-centric workflow.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want banded pricing.
Choose Visage Imaging if
- You need server-side rendering.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud.
- You also want one viewer.
Questions people ask
- Is VetBadger or Visage Imaging better?
- Neither clearly leads. VetBadger starts at $99/month and Visage Imaging at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, VetBadger or Visage Imaging?
- VetBadger starts at $99/month and Visage Imaging at On request.
- Does VetBadger or Visage Imaging run on more platforms?
- VetBadger runs on Web, iOS, Android. Visage Imaging runs on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud.
- What is VetBadger best used for?
- VetBadger is most often used for a two-vet small animal clinic moving off an ageing on-premises server that nobody wants to maintain, a practice that wants client texting logged against the medical record rather than sitting in a separate messaging tool, a clinic adding telehealth consultations without buying a separate video and payment stack, an owner who wants exam and revenue reporting without exporting to a spreadsheet every month. Of those, a two-vet small animal clinic moving off an ageing on-premises server that nobody wants to maintain and a practice that wants client texting logged against the medical record rather than sitting in a separate messaging tool are not what Visage Imaging is typically brought in for.
- What can VetBadger do that Visage Imaging cannot?
- VetBadger covers Chart-centric workflow, Banded pricing, Chart SMS and email, Integrated telehealth. Visage Imaging covers Server-side rendering, One Viewer, Native multi-dimensional tools, Digital breast tomosynthesis reading.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
VetBadger: How is VetBadger priced?
By user band: roughly USD 99 a month for one to two users, USD 249 for three to ten, USD 499 for eleven to twenty and USD 599 for twenty-one to forty.
Visage Imaging: Who owns Visage Imaging?
Pro Medicus Limited, listed on the Australian Securities Exchange. That listing means major contract values and terms are publicly announced.
VetBadger: Is hosting extra?
No. Cloud hosting and backup are included in the subscription, with no server to buy or maintain.
Visage Imaging: How is Visage priced?
Per exam, against a minimum annual volume, on multi-year terms. Because Pro Medicus discloses large contract totals and durations to the market, buyers can estimate a per exam rate before entering negotiation.
VetBadger: Does it do telehealth?
Yes, integrated telehealth is included rather than sold as an add-on.
Visage Imaging: Is Visage 7 FDA cleared for diagnostic interpretation?
Yes, Visage 7 holds 510(k) clearance for diagnostic viewing including mammography and tomosynthesis on validated displays. Confirm the exact cleared modality list for your intended use.
VetBadger: Is it suitable for a specialty or referral hospital?
Not really. It is built for general small animal practice and lacks specialty, referral and equine workflow depth.
Visage Imaging: Does it work as a full cloud PACS?
Yes, Visage 7 runs complete PACS operations in the cloud rather than cloud viewing over an on-premise archive.
Related pages
More on Visage Imaging
Other head to heads
- VetBadger vs ezyVet
- VetBadger vs Provet Cloud
- VetBadger vs Shepherd
- VetBadger vs Onward Vet
- VetBadger vs Hippo Manager
- VetBadger vs Animana
- VetBadger vs IDEXX Neo
- VetBadger vs Covetrus Pulse
- VetBadger vs Digitail
- VetBadger vs Vetspire
- VetBadger vs VIA Veterinary
- VetBadger vs Vet Radar
- VetBadger vs VisionVPM
- VetBadger vs IDEXX Cornerstone
- VetBadger vs ImproMed
- VetBadger vs Sectra
- VetBadger vs Rad AI
- VetBadger vs Epic Systems
- VetBadger vs Fujifilm Synapse
- VetBadger vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- VetBadger vs Gleamer
- VetBadger vs Annalise.ai
- VetBadger vs OpenMRS
- VetBadger vs Signant Health
- VetBadger vs Ambra Health
- VetBadger vs Aidoc
- VetBadger vs Clue
- VetBadger vs Allscripts
- VetBadger vs Dentrix
- VetBadger vs DHIS2
- VetBadger vs Flo
- VetBadger vs Epic MyChart
- Visage Imaging vs ezyVet
- Visage Imaging vs Provet Cloud
- Visage Imaging vs Shepherd
- Visage Imaging vs Onward Vet
- Visage Imaging vs Hippo Manager
- Visage Imaging vs Animana
- Visage Imaging vs IDEXX Neo
- Visage Imaging vs Covetrus Pulse
- Visage Imaging vs Digitail
- Visage Imaging vs Vetspire
- Visage Imaging vs VIA Veterinary
- Visage Imaging vs Vet Radar
- Visage Imaging vs VisionVPM
- Visage Imaging vs IDEXX Cornerstone
- Visage Imaging vs ImproMed
- Visage Imaging vs Sectra
- Visage Imaging vs Rad AI
- Visage Imaging vs Epic Systems
- Visage Imaging vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Visage Imaging vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Visage Imaging vs Gleamer
- Visage Imaging vs Annalise.ai
- Visage Imaging vs OpenMRS
- Visage Imaging vs Signant Health
- Visage Imaging vs Ambra Health
- Visage Imaging vs Aidoc
- Visage Imaging vs Clue
- Visage Imaging vs Allscripts
- Visage Imaging vs Dentrix
- Visage Imaging vs DHIS2
- Visage Imaging vs Flo
- Visage Imaging vs Epic MyChart
