Softwr

Veterinary · head to head

VetBadger vs VisionVPM

VetBadger logo

VetBadger

Veterinary

Cloud veterinary practice management sold in user bands rather than per seat

From
$99/month
Rated
-
VisionVPM logo

VisionVPM

Veterinary

On-premise practice management for veterinary groups in Australia, New Zealand, the UK and Ireland

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: VetBadger pricing is banded rather than per seat, so a three-user clinic pays USD 249, the same as a ten-user one, which is roughly USD 83 per user against USD 25 for a practice that fills the band.; VisionVPM it needs a Windows server, a backup regime and someone responsible for both, so the true cost includes IT support that cloud competitors absorb into their subscription.
  • They diverge on capability: VetBadger covers Chart-centric workflow, VisionVPM covers Local database.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which VetBadger and VisionVPM actually diverge.

Attributes where VetBadger and VisionVPM differ
AttributeVetBadgerVisionVPM
Starting price$99/monthOn request
Pricing modelPer month by user bandquote
PlatformsWeb, iOS, AndroidWindows

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Veterinary).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in VetBadger

  • Chart-centric workflow
  • Banded pricing
  • Chart SMS and email
  • Integrated telehealth
  • Exam reporting
  • QuickBooks sync
  • Cloud hosting
  • Reminders

Only in VisionVPM

  • Local database
  • Large and mixed animal modules
  • Stock and wholesale ordering
  • Debtor and account management
  • Multi-site consolidation
  • Clinical reminders

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

VetBadger

  • A two-vet small animal clinic moving off an ageing on-premises server that nobody wants to maintainnot VisionVPM
  • A practice that wants client texting logged against the medical record rather than sitting in a separate messaging toolnot VisionVPM
  • A clinic adding telehealth consultations without buying a separate video and payment stacknot VisionVPM
  • An owner who wants exam and revenue reporting without exporting to a spreadsheet every monthnot VisionVPM

VisionVPM

  • A rural mixed practice where internet connectivity is too unreliable to depend on a browser-only systemnot VetBadger
  • A corporate group that requires clinical and financial data to remain on infrastructure it controlsnot VetBadger
  • A farm-heavy practice needing herd recording and monthly account billing that companion-animal cloud systems handle poorlynot VetBadger
  • An established VisionVPM site weighing an upgrade against the cost and disruption of migrating to a cloud systemnot VetBadger

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

VetBadger

  • Pricing is banded rather than per seat, so a three-user clinic pays USD 249, the same as a ten-user one, which is roughly USD 83 per user against USD 25 for a practice that fills the band.
  • Crossing a band boundary is a step change, so hiring one extra person can raise the software bill by USD 150 or USD 250 overnight with no extra capability in return.
  • The integration list is short compared with the market leaders, and in-house laboratory and imaging equipment support is the usual gap, which can mean manual result entry.
  • It is aimed at general small animal practice, with none of the specialty, referral, equine or ambulatory workflow depth that larger platforms carry.
  • As a smaller vendor it has less migration tooling and fewer conversion specialists than the large incumbents, so moving years of legacy records in is more of a project than a service.

VisionVPM

  • It needs a Windows server, a backup regime and someone responsible for both, so the true cost includes IT support that cloud competitors absorb into their subscription.
  • Upgrades are scheduled events with downtime rather than transparent releases, which means version drift across a multi-site group and a coordination burden at each release.
  • Covetrus is steering customers towards its cloud product, so development effort is unlikely to favour VisionVPM long term and buyers should assume a migration eventually.
  • Remote and out-of-hours access requires a remote desktop or Citrix layer, which adds licensing, latency and another system to secure.
  • Ordering and prescription workflows are built around Covetrus as the supplier, so a practice buying from other wholesalers loses the automated parts and reverts to manual entry.

Pricing, plan by plan

VetBadger

$99/month
  • 1 to 2 users$99/month
    • Cloud hosting and backup included
    • Full medical records and scheduling
    • Chart-centric SMS and email
  • 3 to 10 users$249/month
    • Same feature set across the band
    • Flat price whether you have three users or ten
    • Exam detail reporting
  • 11 to 20 users$499/month
    • Multi-user scheduling
    • Full reporting
    • Priority support
  • 21 to 40 users$599/month
    • Largest published band
    • All features included
    • Support for larger single-site practices

VisionVPM

On request
  • VisionVPM$undefined/year
    • Licence and annual support quoted per practice
    • Server hardware and Windows licences bought separately
    • Data migration quoted per site

Which should you pick?

Choose VetBadger if

  • You need chart-centric workflow.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want banded pricing.

Choose VisionVPM if

  • You need local database.
  • You work on Windows.
  • You also want large and mixed animal modules.

Questions people ask

Is VetBadger or VisionVPM better?
Neither clearly leads. VetBadger starts at $99/month and VisionVPM at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, VetBadger or VisionVPM?
VetBadger starts at $99/month and VisionVPM at On request.
Does VetBadger or VisionVPM run on more platforms?
VetBadger runs on Web, iOS, Android. VisionVPM runs on Windows.
What is VetBadger best used for?
VetBadger is most often used for a two-vet small animal clinic moving off an ageing on-premises server that nobody wants to maintain, a practice that wants client texting logged against the medical record rather than sitting in a separate messaging tool, a clinic adding telehealth consultations without buying a separate video and payment stack, an owner who wants exam and revenue reporting without exporting to a spreadsheet every month. Of those, a two-vet small animal clinic moving off an ageing on-premises server that nobody wants to maintain and a practice that wants client texting logged against the medical record rather than sitting in a separate messaging tool are not what VisionVPM is typically brought in for.
What can VetBadger do that VisionVPM cannot?
VetBadger covers Chart-centric workflow, Banded pricing, Chart SMS and email, Integrated telehealth. VisionVPM covers Local database, Large and mixed animal modules, Stock and wholesale ordering, Debtor and account management.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

VetBadger: How is VetBadger priced?

By user band: roughly USD 99 a month for one to two users, USD 249 for three to ten, USD 499 for eleven to twenty and USD 599 for twenty-one to forty.

VisionVPM: Can VisionVPM run in the cloud?

Only by hosting the Windows server yourself or through a partner and connecting over remote desktop. It is not a browser application and hosting it does not make it one.

VetBadger: Is hosting extra?

No. Cloud hosting and backup are included in the subscription, with no server to buy or maintain.

VisionVPM: Is VisionVPM still being developed?

It receives maintenance and compliance updates, but its owner sells a separate cloud product and directs new development there. Plan on a migration within the life of your next server.

VetBadger: Does it do telehealth?

Yes, integrated telehealth is included rather than sold as an add-on.

VisionVPM: Does it work outside Australasia and the UK?

It is sold and supported in Australia, New Zealand, the UK and Ireland. Tax handling and supplier integrations are built for those markets.

VetBadger: Is it suitable for a specialty or referral hospital?

Not really. It is built for general small animal practice and lacks specialty, referral and equine workflow depth.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads