ERP · head to head
Omnea vs Unanet

Omnea
ERP
Procurement orchestration and third-party risk management from intake through renewal
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Unanet
ERP
Project ERP and CRM built for government contractors and architecture and engineering firms
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Omnea it covers intake through contract only, so invoicing, payment and spend analysis remain with other systems and the promised end-to-end view is partial.; Unanet no pricing is published for any Unanet product; every line is quoted per user per month with separate implementation fees, so a small contractor cannot budget the first year without a full sales cycle.
- They diverge on capability: Omnea covers Intelligent intake, Unanet covers DCAA-oriented timekeeping.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Omnea and Unanet actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (ERP).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Omnea
- Intelligent intake
- No-code workflow builder
- Supplier portal
- Third-party risk management
- Contract and renewal management
- AI assistance
- Spend and cycle reporting
- Price intelligence
Only in Unanet
- DCAA-oriented timekeeping
- Indirect rate management
- Contract type support
- Project accounting
- Resource planning
- Unanet CRM
- Compliant invoicing
- Unanet ERP AE
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Omnea
- A regulated European business that must evidence supplier due diligence for every third party it engagesnot Unanet
- A company where security review is the slowest step in every software purchase and nobody can see where a request is stucknot Unanet
- An organisation renewing dozens of supplier contracts a year with no owner assigned to any renewal datenot Unanet
- A procurement team wanting to configure approval rules themselves rather than raising a ticket with engineeringnot Unanet
Unanet
- A federal contractor moving from QuickBooks and spreadsheets because it has won its first cost-reimbursable contract and needs an accounting system that survives a DCAA adequacy reviewnot Omnea
- A services firm that must calculate and true up provisional indirect rates each year and cannot do it credibly in Excel any longernot Omnea
- An architecture and engineering practice tracking utilisation and project profitability across dozens of concurrent jobsnot Omnea
- A government contractor consolidating a separate CRM, timekeeping tool and accounting package into one system so pipeline and backlog reconcilenot Omnea
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Omnea
- It covers intake through contract only, so invoicing, payment and spend analysis remain with other systems and the promised end-to-end view is partial.
- As a younger vendor its integration library is narrower than the established suites, and connections into older on-premise ERP systems may require custom work.
- Pricing is entirely quoted with no published tiers, and the vendor is small enough that comparable public reference points are scarce.
- Third-party risk depth is good for questionnaire-driven assessment but lighter than a dedicated GRC platform on continuous monitoring and control mapping, so heavily regulated firms may still need both.
- Its value is concentrated in organisations with a formal procurement policy and a compliance obligation; a company without either gets an approval workflow tool at enterprise pricing.
Unanet
- No pricing is published for any Unanet product; every line is quoted per user per month with separate implementation fees, so a small contractor cannot budget the first year without a full sales cycle.
- Implementation is a project rather than a signup, involving chart of accounts design, indirect pool structure and data migration, and third parties report implementation fees reaching five figures for mid-sized deployments, an amount easily missed when comparing per-user rates.
- The interface is dated compared with modern SaaS finance products, which raises training time for staff who only touch it to enter a timesheet and increases the support burden on the finance team.
- ERP and CRM are separate products with separate contracts, so a firm that wants pipeline, backlog and actuals in one place pays twice and still deals with an integration boundary between them.
- Its value is concentrated in United States federal and state contracting compliance, so a firm that does no public-sector work is paying for indirect rate machinery and DCAA audit behaviour it will never use, and a non-US firm gets almost nothing from the product’s main differentiator.
Pricing, plan by plan
Omnea
On request- Omnea$undefined/year
- Intake, approval orchestration and supplier portal
- Third-party risk management module
- No-code workflow configuration
Unanet
On request- Unanet ERP GovCon$undefined/year
- Project accounting with indirect rate pools
- DCAA-oriented daily timekeeping and audit trail
- Cost-plus, T&M and fixed price contract billing
- Unanet ERP AE$undefined/year
- Project accounting configured for architecture and engineering firms
- Resource planning and utilisation reporting
- Priced per user per month, quoted
- Unanet CRM$undefined/year
- Pursuit and opportunity tracking
- Proposal content library and reuse
- Sold separately from ERP; quoted
Which should you pick?
Choose Unanet if
- You need dcaa-oriented timekeeping.
- You work on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- You also want indirect rate management.
Questions people ask
- Is Omnea or Unanet better?
- Neither clearly leads. Omnea starts at On request and Unanet at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Omnea or Unanet?
- Omnea starts at On request and Unanet at On request.
- Does Omnea or Unanet run on more platforms?
- Omnea runs on Web. Unanet runs on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- What is Omnea best used for?
- Omnea is most often used for a regulated european business that must evidence supplier due diligence for every third party it engages, a company where security review is the slowest step in every software purchase and nobody can see where a request is stuck, an organisation renewing dozens of supplier contracts a year with no owner assigned to any renewal date, a procurement team wanting to configure approval rules themselves rather than raising a ticket with engineering. Of those, a regulated european business that must evidence supplier due diligence for every third party it engages and a company where security review is the slowest step in every software purchase and nobody can see where a request is stuck are not what Unanet is typically brought in for.
- What can Omnea do that Unanet cannot?
- Omnea covers Intelligent intake, No-code workflow builder, Supplier portal, Third-party risk management. Unanet covers DCAA-oriented timekeeping, Indirect rate management, Contract type support, Project accounting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Omnea: How does it differ from Zip?
Both do intake and approval orchestration. Omnea puts third-party risk assessment inside the same workflow and has a European base and compliance orientation, which matters under GDPR and DORA.
Unanet: What does Unanet cost?
Nothing is published. Pricing is per user per month and quoted, with implementation fees charged separately on top of the subscription.
Omnea: Does it replace our ERP?
No. It handles the request through contract stage and hands off to the finance system for purchase orders, invoicing and payment.
Unanet: Does Unanet make you DCAA compliant?
No software does. Unanet provides the timekeeping controls, audit trail and indirect rate accounting that an adequacy review looks for; the policies and their enforcement are still yours.
Omnea: What does it cost?
Not published. It is an annual subscription quoted by company size and modules.
Unanet: Is Unanet CRM included with the ERP?
No. Unanet CRM, built on the acquired Cosential platform, is a separate product with its own contract.
Omnea: Do we still need a GRC tool?
Possibly. Omnea handles supplier due diligence well; continuous control monitoring and framework mapping remain a dedicated GRC job.
Unanet: How does it compare with Deltek?
Unanet typically targets smaller contractors than Deltek Costpoint and is quicker to implement, but has less depth for very large multi-segment organisations.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Omnea vs Zip
- Omnea vs Zycus
- Omnea vs Levelpath
- Omnea vs Jaggaer
- Omnea vs Ivalua
- Omnea vs Axelor
- Omnea vs Icertis
- Omnea vs Plex Manufacturing Cloud
- Omnea vs IFS Cloud
- Omnea vs IQMS
- Omnea vs SYSPRO
- Omnea vs Unit4
- Omnea vs Priority Software
- Omnea vs Protean ERP
- Omnea vs QAD ERP
- Omnea vs Ramco
- Omnea vs Rootstock
- Omnea vs Striven
- Omnea vs Deltek
- Omnea vs NetSuite
- Omnea vs Epicor
- Omnea vs Odoo
- Omnea vs Holded
- Omnea vs DEAR Systems
- Omnea vs SAP S/4HANA
- Omnea vs Visibility
- Omnea vs Yonyou
- Omnea vs GEP SMART
- Unanet vs Zip
- Unanet vs Zycus
- Unanet vs Levelpath
- Unanet vs Jaggaer
- Unanet vs Ivalua
- Unanet vs Axelor
- Unanet vs Icertis
- Unanet vs Plex Manufacturing Cloud
- Unanet vs IFS Cloud
- Unanet vs IQMS
- Unanet vs SYSPRO
- Unanet vs Unit4
- Unanet vs Priority Software
- Unanet vs Protean ERP
- Unanet vs QAD ERP
- Unanet vs Ramco
- Unanet vs Rootstock
- Unanet vs Striven
- Unanet vs Deltek
- Unanet vs NetSuite
- Unanet vs Epicor
- Unanet vs Odoo
- Unanet vs Holded
- Unanet vs DEAR Systems
- Unanet vs SAP S/4HANA
- Unanet vs Visibility
- Unanet vs Yonyou
- Unanet vs GEP SMART
