ERP · head to head
SAP S/4HANA vs Unanet

SAP S/4HANA
ERP
SAP's current ERP, running only on the HANA database, with a migration deadline behind it
- From
- $5000/month
- Rated
- -

Unanet
ERP
Project ERP and CRM built for government contractors and architecture and engineering firms
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: SAP S/4HANA implementation and integration costs routinely run to several times the software cost, and the subscription clock typically starts long before go live, so the first contract year buys much less usable production time than the headline suggests.; Unanet no pricing is published for any Unanet product; every line is quoted per user per month with separate implementation fees, so a small contractor cannot budget the first year without a full sales cycle.
- They diverge on capability: SAP S/4HANA covers HANA in-memory database, Unanet covers DCAA-oriented timekeeping.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which SAP S/4HANA and Unanet actually diverge.
| Attribute | SAP S/4HANA | Unanet |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $5000/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Cloud, Windows, Linux | Web, Cloud, iOS, Android |
| Founded | 1972 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (ERP).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in SAP S/4HANA
- HANA in-memory database
- Core finance
- Supply chain and manufacturing
- Country localisations
- Fiori interface
- Deployment options
- Business Technology Platform
- Embedded analytics
Only in Unanet
- DCAA-oriented timekeeping
- Indirect rate management
- Contract type support
- Project accounting
- Resource planning
- Unanet CRM
- Compliant invoicing
- Unanet ERP AE
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
SAP S/4HANA
- An existing ECC customer facing the end of mainstream maintenance and choosing between migration and replacementnot Unanet
- A multinational needing statutory compliance and consolidation across many countries in one system of recordnot Unanet
- A large manufacturer whose supply chain complexity exceeds what mid-market ERP can modelnot Unanet
- A group standardising a fragmented estate of divisional ERP systems onto a single templatenot Unanet
Unanet
- A federal contractor moving from QuickBooks and spreadsheets because it has won its first cost-reimbursable contract and needs an accounting system that survives a DCAA adequacy reviewnot SAP S/4HANA
- A services firm that must calculate and true up provisional indirect rates each year and cannot do it credibly in Excel any longernot SAP S/4HANA
- An architecture and engineering practice tracking utilisation and project profitability across dozens of concurrent jobsnot SAP S/4HANA
- A government contractor consolidating a separate CRM, timekeeping tool and accounting package into one system so pipeline and backlog reconcilenot SAP S/4HANA
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
SAP S/4HANA
- Implementation and integration costs routinely run to several times the software cost, and the subscription clock typically starts long before go live, so the first contract year buys much less usable production time than the headline suggests.
- Custom ABAP from an ECC installation must be assessed against the simplification list and either retired or rebuilt, and this remediation is normally the largest and most underestimated line in a brownfield conversion.
- The public cloud edition constrains modification by design, so organisations that depend on non-standard processes are pushed either to change the process or to pay for the private edition, and that decision is often made after the contract is signed.
- SAP intends extensions to live on the separately licensed Business Technology Platform, so the extensibility model that makes upgrades safe also adds a second subscription and a second set of skills to the total cost.
- Exit is effectively impossible at reasonable cost, because the data model, the accumulated configuration and the trained staff around a large installation represent a switching cost that outweighs any competing vendor's discount, so the decision binds for a decade or more.
Unanet
- No pricing is published for any Unanet product; every line is quoted per user per month with separate implementation fees, so a small contractor cannot budget the first year without a full sales cycle.
- Implementation is a project rather than a signup, involving chart of accounts design, indirect pool structure and data migration, and third parties report implementation fees reaching five figures for mid-sized deployments, an amount easily missed when comparing per-user rates.
- The interface is dated compared with modern SaaS finance products, which raises training time for staff who only touch it to enter a timesheet and increases the support burden on the finance team.
- ERP and CRM are separate products with separate contracts, so a firm that wants pipeline, backlog and actuals in one place pays twice and still deals with an integration boundary between them.
- Its value is concentrated in United States federal and state contracting compliance, so a firm that does no public-sector work is paying for indirect rate machinery and DCAA audit behaviour it will never use, and a non-US firm gets almost nothing from the product’s main differentiator.
Pricing, plan by plan
SAP S/4HANA
$5000/month- Cloud Standard$5000/month
- Core ERP functionality
- Cloud deployment
- Real-time analytics
- Cloud Premium$8000/month
- Advanced features
- AI and ML capabilities
- Priority support
Unanet
On request- Unanet ERP GovCon$undefined/year
- Project accounting with indirect rate pools
- DCAA-oriented daily timekeeping and audit trail
- Cost-plus, T&M and fixed price contract billing
- Unanet ERP AE$undefined/year
- Project accounting configured for architecture and engineering firms
- Resource planning and utilisation reporting
- Priced per user per month, quoted
- Unanet CRM$undefined/year
- Pursuit and opportunity tracking
- Proposal content library and reuse
- Sold separately from ERP; quoted
Which should you pick?
Choose SAP S/4HANA if
- You need hana in-memory database.
- You work on Cloud, Windows, Linux.
- You also want core finance.
Choose Unanet if
- You need dcaa-oriented timekeeping.
- You work on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- You also want indirect rate management.
Questions people ask
- Is SAP S/4HANA or Unanet better?
- Neither clearly leads. SAP S/4HANA starts at $5000/month and Unanet at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, SAP S/4HANA or Unanet?
- SAP S/4HANA starts at $5000/month and Unanet at On request.
- Does SAP S/4HANA or Unanet run on more platforms?
- SAP S/4HANA runs on Cloud, Windows, Linux. Unanet runs on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- What is SAP S/4HANA best used for?
- SAP S/4HANA is most often used for an existing ecc customer facing the end of mainstream maintenance and choosing between migration and replacement, a multinational needing statutory compliance and consolidation across many countries in one system of record, a large manufacturer whose supply chain complexity exceeds what mid-market erp can model, a group standardising a fragmented estate of divisional erp systems onto a single template. Of those, an existing ecc customer facing the end of mainstream maintenance and choosing between migration and replacement and a multinational needing statutory compliance and consolidation across many countries in one system of record are not what Unanet is typically brought in for.
- What can SAP S/4HANA do that Unanet cannot?
- SAP S/4HANA covers HANA in-memory database, Core finance, Supply chain and manufacturing, Country localisations. Unanet covers DCAA-oriented timekeeping, Indirect rate management, Contract type support, Project accounting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
SAP S/4HANA: What is the actual deadline for leaving ECC?
SAP has set mainstream maintenance for the older Business Suite to end in 2027, with paid extended maintenance available for a further period to 2030. Confirm the current dates and terms with SAP directly, because the commercial detail has been adjusted more than once and it determines your negotiating window.
Unanet: What does Unanet cost?
Nothing is published. Pricing is per user per month and quoted, with implementation fees charged separately on top of the subscription.
SAP S/4HANA: Greenfield or brownfield?
Brownfield carries your existing configuration and custom code forward, which is faster to start and slower to finish because everything must be remediated. Greenfield rebuilds on standard processes, which costs more in change management and leaves a cleaner system. The right answer depends mostly on how much of your existing configuration you would defend to a board.
Unanet: Does Unanet make you DCAA compliant?
No software does. Unanet provides the timekeeping controls, audit trail and indirect rate accounting that an adequacy review looks for; the policies and their enforcement are still yours.
SAP S/4HANA: Is the public cloud edition cheaper?
To run, generally yes. Whether it is cheaper overall depends on whether your processes fit within its extensibility limits. If they do not, the savings evaporate into workarounds or into a move to the private edition.
Unanet: Is Unanet CRM included with the ERP?
No. Unanet CRM, built on the acquired Cosential platform, is a separate product with its own contract.
SAP S/4HANA: How should I approach pricing negotiation?
Treat licence, infrastructure, BTP, the integrator and the internal backfill as one number and negotiate against it. Also settle indirect and digital access terms explicitly in writing, since usage from connected systems has been a recurring source of unbudgeted cost.
Unanet: How does it compare with Deltek?
Unanet typically targets smaller contractors than Deltek Costpoint and is quicker to implement, but has less depth for very large multi-segment organisations.
Related pages
More on SAP S/4HANA
Other head to heads
- SAP S/4HANA vs IFS Cloud
- SAP S/4HANA vs Infor CloudSuite
- SAP S/4HANA vs DEAR Systems
- SAP S/4HANA vs Fishbowl
- SAP S/4HANA vs MRPeasy
- SAP S/4HANA vs Dynamics AX
- SAP S/4HANA vs Kingdee
- SAP S/4HANA vs Epicor
- SAP S/4HANA vs Unit4
- SAP S/4HANA vs Odoo
- SAP S/4HANA vs Java
- SAP S/4HANA vs Katana MRP
- SAP S/4HANA vs Levelpath
- SAP S/4HANA vs OpenBravo
- SAP S/4HANA vs Zycus
- SAP S/4HANA vs IFS
- SAP S/4HANA vs Infor
- SAP S/4HANA vs Deltek
- SAP S/4HANA vs NetSuite
- SAP S/4HANA vs Holded
- SAP S/4HANA vs Striven
- SAP S/4HANA vs Jaggaer
- SAP S/4HANA vs Plex Manufacturing Cloud
- SAP S/4HANA vs Ivalua
- SAP S/4HANA vs Visibility
- SAP S/4HANA vs Yonyou
- SAP S/4HANA vs Zip
- SAP S/4HANA vs GEP SMART
- Unanet vs IFS Cloud
- Unanet vs Infor CloudSuite
- Unanet vs DEAR Systems
- Unanet vs Fishbowl
- Unanet vs MRPeasy
- Unanet vs Dynamics AX
- Unanet vs Kingdee
- Unanet vs Epicor
- Unanet vs Unit4
- Unanet vs Odoo
- Unanet vs Java
- Unanet vs Katana MRP
- Unanet vs Levelpath
- Unanet vs OpenBravo
- Unanet vs Zycus
- Unanet vs IFS
- Unanet vs Infor
- Unanet vs Deltek
- Unanet vs NetSuite
- Unanet vs Holded
- Unanet vs Striven
- Unanet vs Jaggaer
- Unanet vs Plex Manufacturing Cloud
- Unanet vs Ivalua
- Unanet vs Visibility
- Unanet vs Yonyou
- Unanet vs Zip
- Unanet vs GEP SMART
