Construction · head to head
Cubit Estimating vs Trimble Pay

Cubit Estimating
Construction
Australian estimating and on-screen takeoff in one window, priced openly per user per month
- From
- 167/month
- Rated
- -

Trimble Pay
Construction
Subcontractor billing and lien waiver automation, formerly sold as Flashtract
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cubit Estimating every subscription carries a minimum twelve month term, so a firm that hires an estimator for one tender period pays for the full year regardless.; Trimble Pay the Flashtract name is being retired in favour of Trimble Pay, so existing documentation, comparison articles and integration listings are split across two names and buyers should confirm which contract entity and which support channel applies
- They diverge on capability: Cubit Estimating covers Integrated takeoff and estimate, Trimble Pay covers Automated pay applications.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cubit Estimating and Trimble Pay actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cubit Estimating | Trimble Pay |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | 167/month | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | quote |
| Platforms | Windows | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cubit Estimating
- Integrated takeoff and estimate
- Calculation and rate sheets
- Price list management
- Bills of quantities
- BIM and IFC takeoff
- Revision management
- AI Estimating add-on
- Job collaboration
Only in Trimble Pay
- Automated pay applications
- State-specific lien waivers
- Waiver release on payment
- Compliance tracking
- Lower-tier tracking
- Payments
- ERP posting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cubit Estimating
- An Australian commercial builder that wants takeoff and estimate in one file rather than exporting quantities from a separate measurement toolnot Trimble Pay
- A quantity surveying practice producing trade-structured bills of quantities to local conventionnot Trimble Pay
- A subcontractor pricing repeat work from maintained supplier price lists rather than rebuilding rates each tendernot Trimble Pay
- A small estimating team that needs to know the annual cost before booking a demo, because the rate card is publishednot Trimble Pay
Trimble Pay
- A general contractor whose accounts payable team rejects a third of subcontractor billings each month for arithmetic or form errorsnot Cubit Estimating
- A contractor working across several states that needs the right statutory waiver language selected automatically rather than from a shared template foldernot Cubit Estimating
- A company that has been quoted Oracle Textura and wants to compare the total cost when the fee falls on the contractor rather than on the tradesnot Cubit Estimating
- A contractor that needs the unconditional waiver to be released only after funds clear, so it is not holding a waiver that a court would treat as ineffectivenot Cubit Estimating
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cubit Estimating
- Every subscription carries a minimum twelve month term, so a firm that hires an estimator for one tender period pays for the full year regardless.
- BIM and IFC takeoff sits only in Enterprise at $250 per user per month, meaning a builder who receives models rather than PDFs is pushed to the top tier whether or not it needs collaboration features.
- The product is Windows only with no macOS or browser client, which excludes practices standardised on Macs unless they run virtualisation.
- Rate libraries, measurement conventions and BOQ structures follow Australian practice, so buyers outside Australia and New Zealand inherit a method that does not match their local standard forms.
- The AI Estimating add-on is priced at an explicitly temporary introductory rate, so a firm building the feature into its workflow is accepting an unspecified future increase on top of the seat price.
Trimble Pay
- The Flashtract name is being retired in favour of Trimble Pay, so existing documentation, comparison articles and integration listings are split across two names and buyers should confirm which contract entity and which support channel applies
- Pricing is not published, and because it is bought by the general contractor rather than charged to subcontractors, the whole cost lands in one budget line rather than being distributed across the supply chain
- It is billing and compliance only, so a contractor still needs a project management system for drawings and RFIs and a construction ERP for the general ledger, and the value depends heavily on the quality of those two integrations
- Lien waiver correctness is a legal question, and the system generates forms rather than giving advice, so a contractor operating in an unusual jurisdiction still needs counsel to confirm the templates match current statute
- Under Trimble the product now sits alongside other Trimble construction financial assets, and buyers signing multi-year terms should ask directly how it is positioned against Viewpoint and the rest of the Trimble construction portfolio
Pricing, plan by plan
Cubit Estimating
167/month- Standard$167/month
- Integrated estimating and takeoff
- Calculation sheets, rate sheets and price lists
- Basic job management
- Professional$222/month
- Everything in Standard
- Code grouping
- Custom reporting
- Enterprise$250/month
- Everything in Professional
- BIM and IFC takeoff
- Multi-user job collaboration
- AI Estimating add-on$20/month
- Automated element recognition
- Works with any edition
- Introductory rate the vendor says will increase
Trimble Pay
On request- Trimble Pay$undefined/year
- Bought by the general contractor, typically priced by project volume or contract value under management
- Subcontractors are not charged a per-project usage fee
- ERP integration and onboarding scoped separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Cubit Estimating if
- You need integrated takeoff and estimate.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want calculation and rate sheets.
Choose Trimble Pay if
- You need automated pay applications.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want state-specific lien waivers.
Questions people ask
- Is Cubit Estimating or Trimble Pay better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cubit Estimating starts at 167/month and Trimble Pay at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cubit Estimating or Trimble Pay?
- Cubit Estimating starts at 167/month and Trimble Pay at On request.
- Does Cubit Estimating or Trimble Pay run on more platforms?
- Cubit Estimating runs on Windows. Trimble Pay runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Cubit Estimating best used for?
- Cubit Estimating is most often used for an australian commercial builder that wants takeoff and estimate in one file rather than exporting quantities from a separate measurement tool, a quantity surveying practice producing trade-structured bills of quantities to local convention, a subcontractor pricing repeat work from maintained supplier price lists rather than rebuilding rates each tender, a small estimating team that needs to know the annual cost before booking a demo, because the rate card is published. Of those, an australian commercial builder that wants takeoff and estimate in one file rather than exporting quantities from a separate measurement tool and a quantity surveying practice producing trade-structured bills of quantities to local convention are not what Trimble Pay is typically brought in for.
- What can Cubit Estimating do that Trimble Pay cannot?
- Cubit Estimating covers Integrated takeoff and estimate, Calculation and rate sheets, Price list management, Bills of quantities. Trimble Pay covers Automated pay applications, State-specific lien waivers, Waiver release on payment, Compliance tracking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cubit Estimating: What does Cubit actually cost?
Standard $167, Professional $222 and Enterprise $250 per user per month on annual billing, in Australian dollars excluding GST. Monthly billing is about 16 per cent more.
Trimble Pay: Is Flashtract still sold under that name?
No. Trimble acquired Flashtract and now sells it as Trimble Pay. The flashtract.com content redirects into the Trimble product pages.
Cubit Estimating: Can I get BIM takeoff without the Enterprise tier?
No. IFC model takeoff is an Enterprise feature only.
Trimble Pay: Do subcontractors pay to use it?
No. The general contractor buys it. This is the main commercial difference from Oracle Textura, where subcontractors are billed a percentage of their contract value per project.
Cubit Estimating: Is there a perpetual licence?
No. Cubit Estimating is subscription only with a minimum twelve month commitment.
Trimble Pay: Does it replace my accounting system?
No. It generates and approves the billing and the waivers, then posts to your construction ERP. You still need the ledger.
Cubit Estimating: Does it suit contractors outside Australia?
It works, but rate libraries and BOQ conventions follow Australian standards, so buyers elsewhere do more setup than a locally built alternative would need.
Trimble Pay: Does it handle lower-tier subcontractors?
Yes, it tracks sub-tier amounts and sworn statements against the prime commitment, which is the usual source of surprise lien exposure.
Related pages
More on Cubit Estimating
More on Trimble Pay
Other head to heads
- Cubit Estimating vs Togal.AI
- Cubit Estimating vs PlanSwift
- Cubit Estimating vs Sage Estimating
- Cubit Estimating vs Bluebeam Revu
- Cubit Estimating vs RIB CostX
- Cubit Estimating vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Cubit Estimating vs HCSS
- Cubit Estimating vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Cubit Estimating vs Handoff
- Cubit Estimating vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Cubit Estimating vs B2W Estimate
- Cubit Estimating vs Dalux
- Cubit Estimating vs Bridgit Bravo
- Cubit Estimating vs Builderbox
- Cubit Estimating vs Buildots
- Cubit Estimating vs Buildxact
- Cubit Estimating vs Chief Architect
- Cubit Estimating vs Clearstory
- Cubit Estimating vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Cubit Estimating vs Procore
- Cubit Estimating vs Sage 300 Construction
- Cubit Estimating vs GCPay
- Cubit Estimating vs Siteline
- Cubit Estimating vs Kojo
- Cubit Estimating vs BuildingConnected
- Cubit Estimating vs Levelset
- Cubit Estimating vs ALICE Technologies
- Cubit Estimating vs Assignar
- Cubit Estimating vs Billd
- Cubit Estimating vs Houzz Pro
- Cubit Estimating vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- Cubit Estimating vs JobTread
- Cubit Estimating vs Jonas Premier
- Cubit Estimating vs Kahua
- Trimble Pay vs Togal.AI
- Trimble Pay vs PlanSwift
- Trimble Pay vs Sage Estimating
- Trimble Pay vs Bluebeam Revu
- Trimble Pay vs RIB CostX
- Trimble Pay vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Trimble Pay vs HCSS
- Trimble Pay vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Trimble Pay vs Handoff
- Trimble Pay vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Trimble Pay vs B2W Estimate
- Trimble Pay vs Dalux
- Trimble Pay vs Bridgit Bravo
- Trimble Pay vs Builderbox
- Trimble Pay vs Buildots
- Trimble Pay vs Buildxact
- Trimble Pay vs Chief Architect
- Trimble Pay vs Clearstory
- Trimble Pay vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Trimble Pay vs Procore
- Trimble Pay vs Sage 300 Construction
- Trimble Pay vs GCPay
- Trimble Pay vs Siteline
- Trimble Pay vs Kojo
- Trimble Pay vs BuildingConnected
- Trimble Pay vs Levelset
- Trimble Pay vs ALICE Technologies
- Trimble Pay vs Assignar
- Trimble Pay vs Billd
- Trimble Pay vs Houzz Pro
- Trimble Pay vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- Trimble Pay vs JobTread
- Trimble Pay vs Jonas Premier
- Trimble Pay vs Kahua
